CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT OF MATHEMATICALLY PERFECTED ECONOMY™

"A Bill of Rights is what the people are entitled to against every government on Earth... and what no just government should refuse." Thomas Jefferson — Letter to James Madison, Paris, Dec. 20, 1787

SCOTTISH REVOLUTION — Declaration of Arbroath

"It is not for glory or riches or honours that we fight, but only for liberty, which no good man will consent to lose but with his life."

PLATO

"The penalty good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men."

Auberon Herbert

"We hold that what one man cannot morally do, a million men cannot morally do; and government, representing many millions of men, cannot do."

Tacitus, Roman senator and historian (A.D. c.56-c.115)

"The more corrupt the state, the more numerous its laws."

Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn

"Fifty-one percent of a nation [or of the few who might retain so much faith in proposed government as to vote] can establish a totalitarian regime, suppress minorities and still remain democratic."

Edward Abbey

A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government.

William Pitt the Younger, speech on the India Bill, November, 1783

"Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves."

John Stossel, "20/20", ABC-TV, Aug. 3, 2001

Patrick Henry did not say, 'Give me absolute safety or give me death.'

John Philpot Curran

Speech upon the Right of Election, 1790. (Speeches. Dublin, 1808.) as quoted in the Oxford Dictionary of Quotations, NY, 1953, p 167 and also in Bartlett's Familiar Quotations, Boston, 1968, p 479:

"It is the common fate of the indolent to see their rights become a prey to the active. The condition upon which God hath given liberty to man is eternal vigilance; which condition if he break, servitude is at once the consequence of his crime and the punishment of his guilt."

THOMAS JEFFERSON

"In questions of power, let no more be heard of confidence in man, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution."

GEORGE WASHINGTON

"The preservation of the sacred fire of liberty and the destiny of the republican model of government are justly considered as deeply, perhaps as finally, staked on the experiment entrusted to the hands of the American people."

Samuel Adams, brother of President John Adams and principal instigator of the Boston Tea Party

Speech at the Philadelphia State House, August 1, 1776

"If you love [the promise of dispossessed] wealth better than liberty, the tranquillity of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen."

Ralph Waldo Emerson, "Fate"

"Intellect annuls fate. So far as a man thinks, he is free. The revelation of thought takes man out of servitude into freedom."

THE REVEREND MARTIN LUTHER KING JR.

THE MISCONCEPTION OF "EXTREMISM"

"Was not Jesus an extremist for love? 'Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, pray for them that despitefully use you.'

Was not Amos an extremist for justice? 'Let justice roll down like waters and righteousness like a mighty stream.'

Was not Paul an extremist for the gospel of Jesus Christ? 'I bear in my body the marks of the Lord Jesus.'

Was not Martin Luther an extremist? 'Here I stand; I can do none other so help me God.'

Was not John Bunyan an extremist? 'I will stay in jail to the end of my days before I make a butchery of my conscience.'

Was not Abraham Lincoln an extremist? 'This nation cannot survive half slave and half free.'

Was not Thomas Jefferson an extremist? 'We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal.'

So the question is not whether we will be extremist, but what kind of extremist will we be.

Will we be extremists for hate or will we be extremists for love? Will we be extremists for the preservation of injustice; or will we be extremists for the cause of justice?

In that dramatic scene on Calvary's hill, three men were crucified. We must not forget that all three were crucified for the same crime — the crime of extremism. Two were extremists for immorality, and thusly fell below their environment. The other, Jesus Christ, was an extremist for love, truth and goodness, and thereby rose above his environment."

JOHN KENNETH GALBRAITH

In economics, the majority are always wrong. The study of money, above all other fields, is one in which complexity is used to disguise truth or to evade truth, not to reveal it.

AYN RAND

"When force is the standard, the murderer wins over the pickpocket, and then that society vanishes in a spread of ruins and slaughter. Do you wish to know whether that day is coming?

Watch Money. Money is a barometer of a society's virtue.

When you see that trading is done, not by consent, but by compulsion — when you see that in order to produce, you need permission from men who produce nothing — when you see that money is flowing to those who deal, not in goods, but in favors — when you see men get richer by graft and pull than by work, and your laws don't protect you against them, but protect them against you — when you see corruption being rewarded and honesty becoming a self-sacrifice — you may know that our society is doomed.

Money is so noble a medium that it does not compete with guns and it does not make terms with brutality. It will not permit a country to survive as half-property, half-loot. Whenever destroyers appear among men, they start by destroying money, for money is men's protection, and the base of a moral existence."

PRESIDENT WOODROW WILSON

"I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country.

A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation therefore, and all our activities, are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated Governments in the civilized world — no longer a Government by free opinion, no longer a Government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a Government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men."

EDMUND BURKE

"The greater the power, the more dangerous the abuse. There is no safety for honest men except by believing all possible evil of evil men. Those who have been once intoxicated with power and have derived any kind of emolument from it can never willingly abandon it. All that it takes for the triumph of evil is that good men and women do nothing."

CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT OF MATHEMATICALLY PERFECTED ECONOMY™

In normal endeavors, we usually rectify whatever can go awry. People working according to usual standards are not forced to deal with artificial obstructions, intending that we fail rectification.

In the case of government however, particularly if any flaw persists, whatever is awry is often purposed; and so the faults of representative government gone awry are regularly entrenched by those who seek power to abuse the intended spirit and limits of government.

This means that the price of tolerated abuse is always likely to be steep, because rectification will so often be obstructed by whatever breadth of entrenchment evolved across the span of abuse. In the end, if the people are to stand against entrenched abusers, then if abuse is tolerated for long, there may be few to look to for representation but the very abusers we need most to remove from office.

Obviously then, the people have a right and certainly even a necessity to draw up their own laws, and to hold a wayward government accountable. This right necessarily exists merely because it is possible their government is usurped, and merely because it is possible their government will not serve them. No more blatant example need be cited than the hundred years we have lived under the so called Federal Reserve System, for even after the president who betrayed us in passing this crime against us admitted it was a most grievous error, the crime was not rescinded; even after it plunged our country and the world into ten years of depression, the crime was not rescinded — the crime, and/or the nature of the crime was never even mentioned in the mainstream media, readily owned by that system of oppression; and even now, every possible hollow attempt to discredit or obstruct reparation is made.

We live then in a time of the greatest possible abuse of government — a government against us.

In studying documents of the first century of our country, I am often struck by the quality of articulation. The writings of Lincoln and those who surrounded him for instance are often fabulous. I often think that the founders and early great leaders of our country who are so different than the pretenders of today were such quality people on many accounts that the design of the checks and balances implemented in the Constitution may demonstrate a weakness. I don't think they ever expected their design to have to account for the extent of apathy and general irreverence for principle that we suffer today.

While most of us may even agree that the founders would be surprised at the present magnitude of degeneration, even such a majority however has no inherent right to take anyone down with them. We are obligated in effect then to uphold standards for which there is no practical police force; but we can structure our processes at least more or less so that those who are disposed to degeneration at least bear the burdens of their own doings. There is such a thing as linking reward and penalty to the deserving and guilty; and nothing teaches us the right way if our political processes will not observe what is linked and attributable to what.

To the cognitive person, this plain linkage is nothing more than propriety; and it deserves no fancier handle than that, so long as we understand that in all cases, propriety involves responsibility not just for action, but for disposition. My point is this however: In the present implementation of representation, not only do we abandon accountability as a custom, we therefore fail to mandate any form of accountability insofar as this essential linkage of responsibility for action and disposition should prevail in every conceivable matter.

In other words, if certain exceedingly mentally lazy people prevail in an election which establishes a process which does not represent the concerns of others, that may be an error, and it may yet establish the process; but no right exists to impose the ill conceived program on others, or to make them subject to consequences to which they may even have resisted. Participation in such a program must be voluntary; and the costs of the program must be born solely by those who volunteer. Representation is not about a majority imposing whatever vacillating will on the rest of us; representation is always, always, always, full, complete accountability.

If ninety percent of a country are duped into subjecting to usury for instance (which is not to say that any of us have ever agreed to the imposition of the so called Federal Reserve System), no right exists to impose usury on the rest. Live by usury if that's the standard you purport to observe; but let wiser others live without it. Let usury bankrupt your programs. But allow us to live by standards which will not bankrupt ours.

No right to monetary cannibalism exists, that elder generations enjoying a generation of turns on the Monopoly board can freely prey on their own progeny for sustenance, even to the degree their progeny have the least chance even to survive. No right exists to leave us their artificially multiplied debts, saying all the while that a thing they do not even understand is right, because temporarily, it benefits them moreso than they can understand propriety would benefit them.

Choose a condemned principle; live yourself by it; and suffer yourself the consequences.

The founders expected the people to look after themselves by electing well. They gave the people the power of impeachment, and if ever there were a time when we should have used it, it is now. But we haven't used this authority, even if many of us have repeatedly asked for impeachment for damn good reason; and while we have been denied impeachment, we have only seen further abuse. Quite possibly then, it is time to remove near the entire lot, for if a people needing mass rectification of a virtual whole out of control government are denied that essential recourse, all certainly is lost.

A government out of control pushes the limits ever further from their intended place; and since it stands to reason that if we cannot impeach a president who falsifies reasons for war, we are hardly apt to remove a great many further "representatives" who stand by even while figureheads are installed to protect the perpetration of further offenses, I would like to submit some long held thoughts on how we can prevent many abuses from ever happening again.

I will keep my points brief here. I have long had two basic ideas for Constitutional Amendments:

1. A government accountability amendment;
2. A mathematically perfected economy™ amendment.

I will enumerate the points of each. The mathematically perfected economy™ is simple; and as its arguments are well documented by this material, I will not repeat the explanation of its points here. Some of the less obvious rationale for the government accountability amendment is articulated, if it might otherwise be difficult to see that its purposes are not so severe as they are necessary. By "government accountability" however, I mean both the government's essential accountability to us, and our essential accountability to each other in regard to the responsibilities and consequences of government.

DECEMBER 16, 2007

In any case, these few words are as much as to say we have had enough. In the present election, already we are seeing extreme abuses of power in denying our candidate the visibility he has earned for us. If the people will ensure they will not be denied these things, there will be little point ultimately in whatever further treachery or attempted deprivations the present deviants intend.

Here we draw the line. Because these very words warn that we have had enough, and because the principles of these proposed amendments are intended to be honored from this day forward in the representation of the people if the people do indeed express their desire to have these principles enforced... in principle then they suffice inasmuch as our declaration of law. In the latter recognition that no lawful, responsible person would disagree with them, no loophole shall exist that they are not the formally recognized principles of a government which has refused to represent us.

No more undeclared, unconstitutional wars. No more breaches of authority or power. Perpetrators are to be held accountable to the full extent of the law — and these further principles are henceforth to be considered the law, if ever they are officially ratified.

GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY AMENDMENT

1. OBLIGATION TO TRUTH

   History has shown that the greatest crimes can be perpetrated by little twisting of the truth. Without formal accountability to the truth we have nothing.

   Government exists to ensure objectives of the people. All its activities therefore are to be restricted to objectives of the people. In those strictly restrictive activities;

   1. Causes or existing conditions, processes, and objectives altogether must be cited in terms of the whole relevant truth, subject to disproof.
   2. What is found not to be true is to be rectified immediately.
   3. What is found to be purposely misrepresented is a criminal violation of the Constitution.
2. OBLIGATION TO EXACTING NOMENCLATURE
   1. In the interests of conveying the truth, all the terminology of government must be tidy and unmistakable, subject to refinement.

      The age of gloriously named, unassented and unjustified wars is over. The age of private institutions stealing from us from within an exoskeleton calling them a "Federal" "Reserve" is over. The age of persistent terminological deception is over. All names/terms must *most* explicitly and wholly disclose the nature of whatever the object of reference is.

   2. Terminology which is found to be purposely misrepresentative in terms of inciting favor which cannot account for the whole nature of the object of reference is a criminal violation of the Constitution.
3. OBLIGATION TO REDUCE ALL LAW TO UNIVERSAL PRINCIPLES
   1. All regulations shall be reduced to the principle which is to apply universally to all.
   2. If it is necessary to impose a temporal implementation of the principle (as in a fishing regulation for instance), the temporal implementation must comply with the principle over explicit limitations of time within which the principle shall be bound to hold.
4. OBLIGATORY MINIMIZATION OF SCOPE, AND PASSAGE OF SCOPE
   1. Each law must comprise no more than an indivisible set of principles.
   2. Each such indivisible set of principles must be passed individually, on its own independent merits.

      Gone is the age of piggy-backing irrelevant favors onto relevant issues.

5. OBLIGATORY MINIMIZATION OF COSTS
   1. The costs of all activities shall be minimized.
   2. Wherever it can be shown that an alternative process as effectively accomplishes the purposes of a program at lesser costs, the less costly process shall immediately prevail.
6. REGULATION OF COMPULSORY PROGRAMS
   1. To the extent practical, no program is to be compulsory.

      Where it can be demonstrated how a compulsory program can satisfactorily be made non compulsory, the non-compulsory implementation shall prevail.

   2. Where regulations make a program compulsory, that program cannot be subject to profit.

      Compulsory insurance for instance therefore must implemented as a non-profit cooperative, where the participants equitably share minimized costs.

7. OBLIGATIONS AND LIMITATIONS OF REPRESENTATION; COMPENSATION
   1. Representatives must hear and account for the just inherent interests of all affected parties.
   2. Not a penny can be accepted in regard to any duty of office, but the regular salary and benefits of the office.
   3. The regular salary and any other benefits received for holding office shall never exceed limits established by public vote.
   4. Should any entity purchase favors in violation of this amendment, they shall be liable for at least as much as all benefits received as a consequence of that unlawful favor.
   5. Should it be necessary to conduct expensive research beyond available data, transparent and accountable research shall be funded by taxation only.
8. THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A VICTIMLESS CRIME
   1. For any law to be enforceable, complainants against ostensible violations of the law, if any, must establish that a victim explicitly perceived damages.
   2. Ordinarily then, said victim will always be the complainant, unless incapable of registering said complaint.
9. MANDATORY VOTING
   1. Participation in representative process is not a privilege; it is an obligation for which every voter is responsible.
   2. Voting for any of the field of candidates however is absolutely not compulsory.
      1. Elected candidates therefore must receive a majority of all mandatory votes.
      2. Should no candidate receive a majority of all mandatory votes, the election must be re-held according to processes affirmed by the people.
10. VOTER ACCOUNTABILITY
    1. Permanent public records of voting are to be kept, not only for official elections, but for primaries and all other preliminary purposes of voting.
       1. The records are to be immediately and permanently available to public scrutiny.
       2. The records are to be organized by sufficiently minute local tallies so that the members of each tallied group may readily affirm the vote of the whole group.
       3. Voter-confirmed group and further, outer group tallies are to be available to public scrutiny so that anyone can verify an election.
    2. Voting for an issue obligates the voter to share in the costs of the proposal.
    3. Voting against an issue entitles the voter to optionally bear the costs of the proposal.
       1. Obviously, no ballot options, wherever applicable, provide for voters to stipulate whether they will share in the costs of the program.
       2. Voting against bearing the financial responsibilities a program does not entitle the voter to share in the ostensible benefits of the program.
       3. War is not to be fought for financial benefit. Therefore, never is there any ostensible financial benefit to be claimed for war.
    4. Taxation must be administered accordingly.
11. ELECTION TAMPERING
    1. As the integrity of elections is vital to representative government, election tampering of any kind shall be a crime punishable by life imprisonment.
12. FREEDOM FOR ACCESSIBILITY TO THE TRUTH, FREEDOM OF INDEPENDENT MASS COMMUNICATION
    1. Because access to the truth and mass communication capability is indispensable to the integrity of election processes, the Internet shall remain free.
    2. Any attempt to diminish this necessary freedom shall be to tamper with the election process.
13. NO EXCLUSION OF CANDIDATES OR ISSUES FROM THE ELECTORAL PROCESS
    1. The people determine whether to put the candidate or issue on the ballot.
    2. The people of the political party determine what candidate to put on the ballot.

       No intermediaries may contradict the vote of the people.

    3. Should the field of candidates be narrowed by any process, that process must be decided by the people.
       1. Processes may be suggested by the people.
       2. Refinements may be suggested by the people.
       3. Practical suggestions must be made available to public affirmation.
       4. Approved suggestions and refinements must be implemented as soon as practical.
       5. Delaying or obstructing these provisions shall be election tampering.
14. BINDING OBLIGATIONS OF CAMPAIGN PROMISES
    1. Any and all promises made by candidates become legal obligations of the candidate.
    2. Any and all promises of a candidate's party platform become obligations of the candidate when candidacy is declared, unless otherwise stipulated.
    3. Any violation of a campaign promise is cause for immediate impeachment.
    4. On making any promise, a declared candidate must be willing to commit the promise to writing within one day.
15. OBLIGATION OF CANDIDATES TO DEMONSTRATE HOW THEIR PROPOSITIONS WILL SUCCEED
    1. Candidates must demonstrate how it is practical for their propositions to succeed.
    2. If it can be proven that a proposition cannot succeed, the candidate can no longer pursue or later assume any office in or from that election.

       The idea of this amendment is to eliminate the likelihood of ascending to office by deception.

       For instance, Ronald Reagan proposed that he would balance the federal budget by fiscal 1984 by reducing federal taxes ten percent per year from fiscal 1981 thru fiscal 1983. Reagan prevailed in the presidential debates after turning to then President Carter and denouncing the some $150 billion of federal debt Carter accumulated over 4 years as "unforgivable." By his own account then, Reagan's record is approximately 20 times "unforgivable," because Reagan amassed $3 trillion in federal debt over the first 7 years of his administration.

       Reagan tripled the debt accumulated not just by President Carter, but over the entire previous history of our country. "The United States" thus descended from the greatest creditor nation in the world to its lowliest debtor.

       What could we have done about this if we had the present amendment?

       1. We suffered double-digit "inflation." As Reagan himself preferred to use the term then, it was mathematically impossible for his ten percent annual reduction in federal taxes even to offset the effects of inflation:
          1. Being as federal taxes are less than the cost of all things, a ten percent decrease in a part of the cost of all things is insufficient to offset increases in the costs of all things exceeding ten percent.
          2. Furthermore, neither does the proposition address the cause of increasing costs, as the one intrinsic cause of perpetually increasing costs is inherent, irreversible multiplication of debt.
          3. It is therefore necessary to implement mathematically perfected economy™ to solve what the Reagan Administration errantly called "inflation."
       2. The real issue therefore is inherent, irreversible multiplication of debt; and the only way to solve this was (as I proposed to Reagan at the time) mathematically perfected economy™.
       3. Furthermore, I provided the Reagan Administration computer models which projected the debt he would accumulate.
       4. Reagan ignored all of this; and the record of his policies is failure.

       Not only could we have eliminated perhaps all the debt Reagan accumulated then by establishing mathematically perfected economy™, we also would have eliminated all multiplication of debt ever since.

       Absolutely then, candidates should be responsible for propositions which can work.

16. CRIMINAL CULPABILITY
    1. Failing to exercise the checks and balances of Constitutional government as intended shall constitute complicity in any crimes committed by breach of authority.
    2. Any officer of government failing to exercise checks and balances to the full degree of their authority against any prospective breach shall therefore be accountable as a party to the offense.
17. CONSTITUTIONALITY OF SERVICE; VIOLATION OF THESE AMENDMENTS
    1. All officers and employees of the government are bound strictly to uphold the Constitution.
    2. Should tangible evidence be presented that any officer or employee of the government has breached the Constitution, their tenure shall immediately be suspended until a trial convicts or absolves them of the alleged offense.
    3. Employees, police or military personnel who deprive citizens of their Constitutional rights, or who breach any of these provisions while responsible for performing their duties, shall never thereafter be eligible for public service.
    4. All willful violations of the Constitution are incontrovertible, mandatory cause for immediate impeachment.
       1. There are no exceptions to mandatory impeachment.
       2. Presidential pardons are only effective when and so long as passed by public vote.

          They are never otherwise effective.

18. GROSS BREACH OF AUTHORITY — NO FAITH IN GOVERNMENT
    1. The people may call for a Gross Breach of Authority vote and emergency election.

       Should a vote grossly determine no faith or confidence in the government, all offices are immediately vacated and an emergency election is held.

    2. General elections, providing beforehand for such event, shall specify alternate emergency candidates.

       The emergency candidate holds office until the emergency election fills the office with a candidate determined by the present conditions.

19. PERIODIC RE-AFFIRMATION
    1. No law is permanent. All law is subject to timely periodic public re-affirmation, to be decided with the original passage of the provision.
    2. Unless otherwise stipulated, the regular term of re-affirmation shall be 4 years.
    3. No unrefirmed duration shall exceed 12 years.
    4. Failure to pass re-affirmation nullifies all ongoing effects of the former provision.
    5. All laws or acts which have not to now been subject to periodic re-affirmation are hereby subject to periodic re-affirmation.
20. IN ALL MATTERS, THE PEOPLE HAVE THE FINAL SAY
    1. No law or act shall stand without the final assent of the people.

       This amendment itself would have obstructed the so called Federal Reserve Act (as would many other of these provisions).

    2. All laws or acts which have not to now been affirmed by public assent are hereby subject to public affirmation.

MATHEMATICALLY PERFECTED ECONOMY™ AMENDMENT

1. CIRCULATION
   1. Government must issue whatever circulation the people require for their commerce.
      1. The people borrow whatever they deem necessary to fund their commerce.
         1. Any restrictions on borrowing are determined by representative government.
         2. The [additional] cost of borrowing is limited to whatever menial fees are required to certify credit-worthiness.
         3. Uniform formulas for determining credit-worthiness are determined by representative government.
      2. The circulation and resultant debts are not subject to interest.
      3. Debts are paid at the rate of consumption of the related asset, which is equivalent to the rate of depreciation.
         1. Representative government determines linear or non-linear rates of depreciation for classes of assets as results in the remaining value of assets equaling, across their lifetime, the related currency remaining in circulation.
         2. Should the debt be paid off prior to expiration of the life of the asset, the debtor can draw from the equity, needing to resume payment only when the original schedule of payment would require so.
         3. Should a subsequent debtor purchase an asset which has been paid off, no more than the remaining value of the asset as determined by the original schedule of payment may be loaned into circulation to finance the transaction.
            1. Thus artificial/false appreciation is not supported.
      4. The remaining value of related assets shall always equal the related currency in circulation.
      5. The value of related assets therefore comprises the consistent value and redeemability of the circulation.
2. RETIREMENT
   1. Because the remaining circulation always equals the remaining debt and remaining value of the related asset, a consistent intrinsic value of the circulation is maintained, conducive to saving.
   2. Retirement sustenance therefore can be provided by saving.
   3. Savings programs can be compulsory or voluntary as determined by representative process.
      1. Rates of savings need only be sufficient to maintain intended standards of living after cessation of work.

         If a consistent standard of living after retirement is to be retained after a career of an equal time span, then, all else being equal, compulsive or voluntary savings should be half of earnings. In other words, if a person is to work from age 20 to 55, then to support an equivalent 35-year span of retirement at the same basic standard of living, half of earnings must be saved over the 35 years during which they are earning.

3. TAXATION
   1. Taxes shall always be levied in such a way as minimizes the costs and complexities of administering the tax.

      Taxes for a road for instance may be integrated with the costs of fuel to encourage fuel conservation and to pay for the road proportionate to usage.

   2. Government can only tax the people for services rendered to the persons taxed.
      1. Projects subject to taxation and requiring finance are funded by publishing the money.
         1. The resultant public debt is paid at the rate of consumption of the related asset.
         2. Equitable liability for payment is determined by representative process.

            Annual payments for a bridge for instance may be paid by dividing the number of periodic crossing into the periodic payments against the related debt. In order to eliminate the maintenance of toll crossings, the tax might be integrated with local fuel costs.

   3. Taxation is never to be used as an instrument of penalization or prevention.
      1. Undesirable activities are simply restricted by law.

"To find the players in all the corruption of the world, 'Follow the money.' To find the captains of world corruption, follow the money all the way."

mike montagne — founder, PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy™, author/engineer of mathematically perfected economy™ (1979)

 del.icio.us  FaceBook  NewsVine  reddit