it is their right, it is their duty...
PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy™ (PFMPE™) : mathematically perfected economy™ (MPE™) is the singular integral solution to 1) inflation and deflation, 2) systemic manipulation of the cost or value of money or property, and 3) inherent, irreversible multiplication of debt in proportion to a vital circulation, engendering inevitable systemic failure at a finite system lifespan defined by an inevitable, terminal sum of insoluble debt. Mathematically Perfected Economy™ is every prospective debtor's right to issue their promise to pay, free of extrinsic manipulation, adulteration, or exploitation of that promise, or the natural opportunity to make good on it.
What's Wrong With Social Credit and Douglas' A + B Theorem?
Rare is the candidate who doesn't exalt the ghost of greatness we once were, as if mountains of perpetually multiplying, insoluble debt, tens of millions of families losing their homes, our vanished industry and overwhelming trade deficits, and our fallen stature as an intellectual power and bedrock of liberty and justice... are not a testament to the opposite.
Ron Paul won on many tangible fronts, because he showed America that even as an unassented central bank's media sought to deny our quest for vital monetary reform, there is a chance to save America from itself. He denied himself and his supporters the ultimate prize, because of a technical deficiency. A quite serious one.
"The Bank of the United States is one of the most deadly hostilities existing against the principles and form of our Constitution. I deem no government safe which is under the vassalage of any self-constituted authorities, or any other authority than that of the nation or its regular functionaries."
"The system of banking is a blot [defect] left in [unsolved by, and unfortunately tolerated by] all our Constitutions [state and federal], which if not covered [eventually solved and revoked] will end in their destruction. I sincerely believe that banking institutions are more dangerous than standing armies; and that the principle of spending money to be paid by posterity is but swindling futurity [on the greatest possible scale]."
"The end of democracy and defeat of the American Revolution will occur when government falls into the hands of the lending institutions and moneyed incorporations."
If the American people ever allow banks to issue their currency, first by inflation and then by deflation [by having to maintain a vital circulation by perpetually re-borrowing principal and interest as subsequent sums of debt, increased perpetually so much as periodic interest], the banks and [bank owned] corporations which will grow up around them will deprive the people of all property, until their children wake homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.
The usual citizen can and should want on the one hand never to have to wade through material which will never serve them; and on the other, if they are to be served, they must be vigilant against what may interpose itself against their service, or what might tie the hands even of well intended representatives as they might be forced to wade through yet another set of illusions and delusions to the truth. Much as the members of the Social Credit forum attacked mathematically perfected economy™ on the purported grounds that the very idea of mathematic solution is flawed then, I hold as a consequence of their persistent rejection on that false premise, and particularly on the costly consequences of it, that we who may be able to show the answer have a responsibility to do so.
When the presumed validity of a simple postulate is debated by its adherents and rejected otherwise for most of a century for faults yet readily raised in gentlemanly discussion, we have to wonder about the viciousness with which those who spend forever at the postulate attack contending theories, not on their merits or obvious resolutions of propositions such as singular solution for inflation and deflation and inherent multiplication of debt, but on purposely destructive and wrong assertions, such as the purported universal impropriety of mathematics as a tool for analysis, proof, or disproof of something truly so simple as true economy.
The ad hoc rejection of math and the viciousness of attacks against qualified mathematic application are particularly suspect. Do they erupt out of plain jealousy when math most of us master in the second grade disproves lackluster lifetimes spent defending indefensible postulates, only because so many have agreed on the initial error that the one useful tool to resolve their debate is mathematics itself? Is it a proper defense to dismiss all possible applicability of math to develop something which is not even a discipline then?
Why attack after all, simple, obvious, and perfect resolutions such as the fact of a singular solution for inflation and deflation, when the very definitions of the terms predicate their absolute mathematic solution? What quality of adherent continues the debate of a conflicting proposition, never even developing a basis of formal proof and theorem to their purported discipline then, only because they first impose the errant precept that mathematics cannot apply?
I frankly am instead tired of Austrian and Social Credit "adherents," who cannot even answer why mathematics purportedly cannot develop the singular solution to inflation and deflation or inherent multiplication of debt — particularly when I weigh the human consequences of their belligerence.
When a single person can establish such solutions by veritable elementary math, what does it say about a vast multitude who dress like penguins and stand together with their feet stuck in the ice... erupting forever in such an incessant chatter against math that Alex Jones or Lou Dobbs or a political candidate who might matter, will never even notice the answers to these simple questions unless they look to what the penguins attack for the possibility it holds the very answer?
A decade ago, which followed on the heels already of decades which could have saved all of us the costs of decades of artificially multiplied debt, I was invited to the Social Credit forum, whereupon I received such a deluge of vicious mail for submission of mathematic solution of inflation, deflation, and artificial multiplication of debt, that until years later when I bothered myself sufficiently with their precious A + B Theorem which they defend by ad hominem and attacks against math, I didn't understand what could explain such dedication to obstruction of solution.
Social Credit, which is based on Douglas' A + B Theorem, thus is one such interposing theory; and particularly as its members such as William B. Ryan have attacked mathematically perfected economy™ in such numbers and with such unwarranted viciousness as has produced no resolution better than Mr. Ryan's purported disproof of mathematically perfected economy™ and my response to his... a few relevant and peaceful observations regarding Social Credit and Douglas' A + B Theorem can separate the wheat from all the chaff.
What's Wrong With Social Credit and Douglas' A + B Theorem?
Mathematically Perfected Economy™ versus alternate propositions
We are all at least intuitively familiar with the principle that a proposition is only true if no interdependent aspect of it can be disproven. If we could prove for instance that it is not necessary to maintain at sufficient intervals a circulation which is equal to the remaining value of related assets to eradicate inflation and deflation... then we disprove the proposition of a singular solution. No one has disproven the proposition because there is one case only which neither comprises an increase or decrease in circulation relative to the assets for which currency is loaned into circulation; and that one case is equality between the circulation and remaining value of the related asset.
Similarly, if interest inherently multiplies debt in proportion to a circulation, then only eradication of interest eliminates inherent, irreversible multiplication of debt to collapse; and if the cost or value of money and property can only be systematically be manipulated by inflation, deflation [relative to intended commerce], and inherent multiplication of debt, then only a combination of the solutions of inflation, deflation, and inherent multiplication of debt further solve manipulation of the cost or value of money or property.
These are simple concepts which do not depend on human behavior for their truth, because the subject human behavior must maintain a sufficient circulation to service debt, and the rules we have developed simply allow them to do so. Moreover, they comprise the singular environment in which we can procure the production of others for whatever we deem to be an equal measure of our own production, because no extraneous cost whatever is imposed upon the system.
Given the plausible perfection of mathematic solution, one may wonder why adherents persist in defending anything contrary to it without an iota of disproof.
According to the Social Credit topic at Wikipedia,
"Social Credit (often called Socred for short) is an economic ideology and a social movement which started in the early 1920s. Social Credit was originally an economic theory developed by Scottish engineer Major C. H. Douglas.  The name Social Credit came from his desire to make the betterment of society (Social) the goal of the monetary system (Credit)."
 C. H. Douglas proposed that because rate of flow of income received in any period of production was less than the prices generated in the same period there arose a deficiency in purchasing power in that period.  He demonstrated this ostensible flaw with his A+B theorem, which states that if A is the payments made to all the consumers in the economy (through wages, salaries and dividends) and B is the payments made by producers that are not paid to consumers (such as the overhead costs of buildings and equipment as they wear out) then the price charged for all goods must be at least A+B , but as only "A" payments are received as income, then incomes received were less than prices generated in the same period of production.
For such a system to sustain itself Douglas asserted that some or all of the following must happen:
If these things don't happen "businesses are forced to lay off workers, unemployment rises, the economy stagnates, taxes go unpaid, governments cut back services, and we have widespread poverty, when physically all of us could be living in plenty."
 Douglas believed that Social Credit could fix this problem by ensuring that there was always enough money (credits) issued to buy all the goods that could be produced. His solution is outlined in three core demands:
The engineer argued that this last demand makes sense now that automation and labor-saving devices have reduced the number of workers we need to produce our goods, and the hours they would have to work.
Douglas' ideas enjoyed great popularity during the Great Depression, although not enough to realize his plan.
Some prominent groups and individuals, most notably the poet Ezra Pound and the leaders of the Australian League of Rights, have subscribed to Social Credit as an economic theory.  Social Credit lays the blame for many economic woes at the feet of private banks, most especially those that practice fractional-reserve banking.
ANALYSIS AND DIFFERENTIATION OF Social Credit and Douglas' A + B Theorem
Very much as in my own work then, C. H. Douglas perceived there are critical flaws in the world's imposed monetary systems. He tried to identify and solve those flaws; and likewise ultimately places blame on the private banking system.
Mathematically Perfected Economy™ therefore can be taken to a substantial degree as vindication for Douglas' thinking if we only concede that the missing piece of Douglas' puzzle is inherent multiplication of debt by interest. Although mathematically perfected economy™ is socially inert in contrast to Douglas' temptation to impose social reform to account for effects he would instead have eradicated by solving inflation, deflation, and inherent multiplication of debt (and cannot resolve by the social constructs), we have more in common than we have apart. Although it was developed wholly independent of Douglas and others' work, mathematically perfected economy™ can be taken in their common regards as a furthering of Douglas' work.
RELATED EXTERNAL MATERIAL
RELATED PRIMARY ARTICLES
RELATED REFUTATIONS/REVIEWS OF CONTROVERSIAL MONETARY PROPOSITIONS
"To find the players in all the corruption of the world, 'Follow the money.' To find the captains of world corruption, follow the money all the way."
mike montagne — founder, PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy™, author/engineer of mathematically perfected economy™ (1979)
REFUTATION OF CONTROVERSIAL MONETARY PROPOSITIONS, REVIEW OF OTHER MATERIAL
REVERSE CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER
pfmpe[ at ]perfecteconomy[ dot ]com
Gross National Public Debt Clock
"National debt," perhaps better said to be "federal debt," refers only to public debt accumulated by the federal government. National debt does not include the even greater sum of private debt, or further public debt accumulated by state and local governments.
PER CAPITA, THE CURRENT FEDERAL PUBLIC DEBT COMES TO APPROXIMATELY THIRTY-THOUSAND DOLLARS.
FIGURED AT THE ROUGH SCALE USED BELOW TO DETERMINE RESPONSIBILITY FOR PRIVATE DEBT, THE AVERAGE FEDERAL DEBT WOULD BE ROUGHLY $93,750 PER ELDER ADULT MOST RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ACCUMULATION OF FEDERAL DEBT. BUT LIKE PRIVATE DEBT, THE UNDUE BURDENS OF THIS SHARE WILL SIMPLY BE SADDLED UPON YOUNGER GENERATIONS.
PER CAPITA U.S. PUBLIC AND PRIVATE DEBT
Estimates of the sum of private and public U.S. debt together, accounting for potential Social Security and Medicare liabilities as of November, 2007, run as much as more than $96 trillion; or $320,000 per capita even for infants; OR AN AVERAGE OF ROUGHLY HALF A MILLION DOLLARS PER ADULT.
THIS EQUATES TO ROUGHLY $1 MILLION PER ELDER ADULT, MOST RESPONSIBLE FOR ENGENDERING THIS DEBT.
TO ADD THIS PAGE TO YOUR BOOKMARKS OR FAVORITES...
BOOKMARKS > BOOKMARK THIS PAGE
TO MAKE THIS PAGE YOUR BROWSER'S HOME PAGE...
TOOLS > OPTIONS...
SPREAD THE WORD!
PEOPLE MAY NEVER COME HERE UNLESS YOU RECOMMEND THIS MATERIAL!
TO SEND THIS PAGE AS A LINK OR PAGE...
FILE > SEND...
CLICK THE COPY-TO-CLIPBOARD TOOLS TO...
COPY THE URL TO THIS PAGE:
COPY THE HTML CODE FOR AN ANCHOR TO THIS PAGE:
COPY THE HTML CODE FOR AN ANCHOR TO OUR HOME PAGE:
PLEASE SUPPORT PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy™!
PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy™ is the original and only bona fide solution to the world's imposed, falsified economic systems. On November 7, 1998, tens of thousands of voters designated PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy™ a Starting Point HOT SITE. Since the early 1990s, even while subject to extensive imitation and plagiarism, we have served up to hundreds of thousands of visitors per month, from all parts of the world.
DONATIONS FROM JANUARY 1979 TO APRIL 2008, $0.00!!! My great appreciation to Max Demarzi and I Young, who have since donated $100 and $50 respectively. You know, $1, $2, $3 is cool. If everybody did that, we wouldn't have any trouble at all maintaining this effort !
While 12,000 homes a day continue to go into foreclosure, mathematically perfected economy™ would re-finance a $100,000 home with a hundred-year lifespan at the overall rate of $1,000 per year or $83.33 per month. Without costing us anything, we would immediately become as much as 12 times as liquid on present revenue. Transitioning to MPE™ would apply all payments already made against existent debt toward principal. Many of us would be debt free. There would be no housing crisis, no credit crisis. Unlimited funding would immediately be available to sustain all the industry we are capable of.
There is no other solution. Regulation can only temper an inherently terminal process.
If you are not promoting mathematically perfected economy™, then you condemn us to monetary failure.
Copyright 1979-2008 by mike montagne and PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy™. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
SEARCH PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy™