Dear Mr. Nader,

I have been following the election and events behind the election very closely, and am responding to your newsletter of this morning, which among other things loosely outlines the non-potentials of Barack Obama’s naive monetary strategies.

If in fact you are open to the proposition of veritable monetary solution, perhaps indeed you may be the last man standing who can save our country. But unless you intend to account for any and all plausible deficiencies of your platform (as we should expect from all candidates, but are so far denied), then as was the case for Mr. Paul, the proof of singular solution I hope to pose to you would mean two very costly things to all of us — that no candidate represents solution; and that fundamental faults intelligent men should see can be expected to manifest in near term systemic failure.

A growing faction of this country recognizes those issues are artificially imposed by what is as much as usurpation of the republican form of government. President Wilson of course apologized for opening the door to a system he did not create, but surely to which he ignorantly rolled out a red carpet. Many books have emerged about these events, but of course, to perceive the corruption which resulted in the so called Federal Reserve System is far less than enough to right our country, which has largely become driven by the so called financial world which exists at the purse strings of this unconstitutional institution and a monetary system which can be proven to have a singular potential to bankrupt us under inherent, irreversible multiplication of debt.

I provided the Reagan Administration with computer models (which you can still download, complete with source code, from our pages) which calculate the maximum possible lifespan of any purported economy subject to interest, and which from the first years of the Reagan Administration, projected his tripling of national debt, and accurately projected for deployed interest rates and circulatory growth, the accumulation of debt to now. Calculations performed during Mr. Reagan’s first term gave us a maximum practical lifespan of the present system to about 2010 AD.

An underlying thesis of these models and the solution of the responsible faults, is the proposition that money cannot be anything but a token of wealth; that further industry can only be sustained by creating new, further tokens of wealth (which therefore cannot represent earned wealth, which according to popular dogma, ostensibly justifies interest); that it is mathematically impossible to solve certain critical, terminal faults if the currency is subject to interest; and that in fact any purported economy subject to interest inherently terminates itself under an inevitable sum of insoluble debt, as a circulation must be maintained to perform the obligation of servicing debt, and as maintenance inherently and irreversibly multiplies debt in proportion to the circulation as we are forced thereby to perpetually re-borrow payments against principal and interest obligations as subsequent sums of debt, perpetually increased so much as periodic interest on an ever greater sum of debt.

If your math is so good as can save the country sir, I’m sure you’ve performed such calculations as indicate in fact that such an accumulation of public and private debt exists; that it is in fact irreversible if we merely maintain a circulation; that banks certainly have no power to consume so much of our production as what we are obliged to pay on the currency in the way of interest; and that of course the accumulation of this debt in proportion to the circulation in fact is terminal, both because it dedicates ever more of the circulation to servicing debt, leaving ever less of the circulation to sustain the commerce which is obliged to service the debt, and because eventually a sum of debt, increasing in proportion to the circulation which dictates the limitations of servicing the escalating sum of debt, thus means an eventual sum of debt will exceed the finite capacity to continue servicing debt.

Of course, this inherent terminal consequence was reached a mere 15 years into the first possible lifespan of said iniquitous system — a system which can only destroy our country, and which *is* destroying our country.

To a leader who can save our country sir, the end of the second possible lifespan of that same system is both obviously and undeniably here; and, particularly under the present circumstances therefore, and as this explanation for our circumstances is both plausible and has never been disproven (see our pages for documented attempts), I for one can hardly imagine for instance Thomas Jefferson or Abraham Lincoln, both of whom tried to solve the same problems, hearing of such a thing as “mathematically perfected economy™,” and not wanting to see me immediately on that matter.

I leave it to you then Mr. Nader, and probably then to economic advisors who cannot be too selfish to obstruct us from overcoming all the implications, to ensure you exhaust this matter to the full interest of real representation — a thing we have lacked far too long.

Any hour of the day or night will be fine.

Yours sincerely,

mike montagne — founder of PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy™ and author/engineer of mathematically perfected economy™ (1979)

This entry was posted on Friday, June 20th, 2008 at 8:43 am and is filed under INITIATIVES, Mathematically Perfected Economy, Ralph Nader, UNASSENTED GLOBALISM, WAR, PEACE and USURY, events and politics. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response or trackback from your own site.