HOME, FOREWORD, SITE DIRECTORY AMENDMENT BLOG FORUM GLOSSARY TESTIMONIALS FREE NEWSLETTER CONTACT JOIN PFMPE™

mathematically perfected economy™ (MPE™)    1  :   the singular integral solution of  1) inflation and deflation,  2) systemic manipulation of the cost or value of money or property, and  3) inherent, artificial multiplication of debt into terminal systemic failure;    2  :  every prospective debtor's right to issue legitimate promises to pay, free of extrinsic manipulation, adulteration, or exploitation of those promises, or the natural opportunity to make good on them;    3  :  our right to certify, to enforce, and to monetize industry and commerce by this one sustaining and truly economic process.

MORPHALLAXIS, January 14, 1979.

mike montagne's mathematically perfected economy™ BLOG

mike montagne at iMac.

YOU ARE VIEWING ARTICLES IN THE FOLLOWING CATEGORY (SELECT CATEGORIES FROM THE DIRECTORY, RIGHT):

To browse all articles, select the mathematically perfected economy™ category from the directory (right). Top and bottom links to 'earlier' and 'more recent' blogs will then include all content.

Monday, December 22nd, 2008

What should concern us is who stands in the way of solution, and why.

mike montagne

RESPONSE TO ELLEN HODGSON BROWN’S CLAIM TO ANSWER TO THE CONTROVERSY

This article responds to Ellen Hodgson Brown’s claim to answer to our controversy (http://webofdebt.wordpress.com/questions-and-answers/response-to-mike-montagne-on-the-pennsylvania-provincial-bank/):

Mike Montagne has posted this on his website, concerning a “controversy” with me of which I was unaware until it was sent to me by someone else.

http://perfecteconomy.com/wp/2008/10/18/open-letter-to-global-research-on-the-controversy-with-ellen-hodgson-brown/

My sources on the Pennsylvania land bank are here:

Alvin Rabushka, “The colonial roots of American taxation, 1607-1700: The low-tax beginnings of American prosperity,” Policy Review (Hoover Institution, Stanford University, August/September 2002); “Representation without taxation: The colonial roots of American taxation, 1700?1754,” ibid. (December 2003 & January 2004); Stephen Zarlenga, The Lost Science of Money.

The math works like this: you print $105, lend $100 at 5% interest and spend $5 into the economy on government salaries, projects, etc. $105 is now circulating in the economy, which comes back to the government bank as principal and interest on the $105 loan. You lend THE SAME $100 all over again and spend $5, which returns to the government as principal and interest; etc. The interest funds the government, replacing taxes. No inflation, no government debt, no taxes ? as proven by the Pennsylvania experience.

Ellen

What you only call simplification is hardly a virtue if it fails to account for the issues at hand. It’s not complicated to account for those issues; nor is it an excessive complication to account for those vital issues, as your inability to account for those issues asserts.

You merely claim that the few aspects of the cycle you cite accounts for all issues. You’ve claimed that over and over again, without ever answering to the questions I’ve asked; and of course, you’ve pretended weak answers to others account for their questions, which they have asked (I’ll get to those next).

You don’t even explain for instance what you’re loaning “THE SAME $100 all over again,” assumably back into circulation for. So what simpleton can even truly pretend to understand your purportedly “simple” example? Tell us with necessary certainty, supporters of this proposition, what is she lending the $100 back into circulation for? And how is that this “simple” explanation determines a wholly accountable solution, which is non-inflationary, non-deflationary (able to sustain all industry or trade of all wealth), and so forth? There are no further questions, just because you prefer not to think of them?

In your purported account of accountability, you don’t even cite what the circulation should or must be, if it is to account for or sustain all the stresses which might be (and will be) imposed upon the circulation. Why loan the same $100 back into circulation, as does the present fractional reserve system? How is the same circulation to account for different purposes simultaneously, particularly if for instance we were to trade all wealth at once? How would that same $100 suffice to do that? How does your circulation sustain the possibility of such a transaction?

Worse, how do simpletons pretend to know it can, or that your “solution” is even “more simple,” *unless* they indeed understand that it can?

Do they understand that, Ellen?

It doesn’t of course, because there isn’t an effective circulation equal at all times to the remaining value of all represented wealth. That’s pretty simple. Just a “small” detail we don’t need to account for, or even explain?

Obviously, your purported circulation can only sustain the trade of all wealth if there is an effective circulation equivalent to all wealth. You don’t even understand that there’s a question of such an issue… so you merely reply that’s an unnecessary complication ??one which, of course, you don’t understand.

If you did understand it, you would not be giddy about the proposition or model of a land bank, which can only of course finance the purchase of land (as your earlier correspondence indicates).

Furthermore, obviously, there are further issues which make your proposition ??I’ll give you the simple version, since you prefer that ??”idiotic.” What would make it idiotic?

Because you’re doing two quite inept things here, and only pretending you have answered for these things.

First of all, the only assumable reason you have to spend interest back into circulation is so that it can be paid without re-borrowing it, to maintain a vital circulation (so that it can be paid). In other words, tacitly, your purported solution recognizes my principle that any currency subject to interest inherently multiplies debt in proportion to the obligated circulation, until this multiplication produces a terminal sum of debt.

So all you’re really doing, is paying taxation through what you still call interest (although this is neither its definition or consequence). And of course, you’re doing that only to avoid multiplication of debt by actual/conventional interest, even as you carefully avoid plagiarizing the vital reasons for that, which I provided so long ago ??and all the while since. Of course, neither can your readers possibly understand or appreciate that necessity but in veritable terms ??even as you merely describe the process as a Ponzi Scheme, which of course hardly reflects the need to re-borrow interest as subsequent increases in the sum of debt (to maintain the necessary circulation) ??a requisite and process which certainly is not defined by or incumbent to “Ponzi Schemes.”

While yet you deny this principle that conventional interest multiplies debt in proportion to the obligated circulation, you advocate an obfuscation of taxation, imposed in a form similar to interest, but with the further provision, to avoid the consequence of interest which I raise, of spending all interest payments back into circulation (so that these payments don’t have to be borrowed back into circulation, as is the case with the pattern of *conventional* *interest*).

At the same time, I’ve asked you how this properly administers taxation. How do you ??what is your formula for ??properly adjusting interest so that everyone might pay for instance, different rates of interest, which might properly distribute their burden of taxation, if particularly, it were the case that some or others of us not rightly bear the same proportion of taxation? Worse, how is it those who do not assume debts are taxed? Or what is the connection between government service and proper rates of taxation, which makes “interest” levied against debt the proper rate of taxation for all cases?

The idea that your arbitrary rate of interest answers to any of these issues is preposterous; and even the lowliest simpletons should realize this.

I’ll give you one clear example of how ludicrous this idea is: I’m paying the “right” amount of taxation for the degree to which government serves me. Then, without receiving any more service of the government, it is necessary for me to assume say 100 times my previous debt. Now I’m paying 100 times as much taxes through your obfuscation of interest. How is that right? Because it’s ostensibly “simple”?

To simply not answer the question, neither conveys a virtue of your proposition, or the purported simplicity you claim, for if you had accounted for these things, you would explain in sufficient detail all the more complicated processes by which interest rates might be adjusted upward or downward as more property per government service was financed (requiring lower interest rates for all), or individuals opted out of government programs (which requires lower interest rates for them), or further government spending on the accounts of some increased the share/interest of government costs for others, and so forth.

After all, once a person has paid their debts, or if a person assumes no debt, they are paying no taxes whatever, regardless however much their enjoyment of government services might stress the taxation system, placing the burden on others.

This is not solution. It’s preposterous pretension of solution. Nor is it simple, because it obviously places tremendous complications upon implementation, merely if we are to distribute the tax burden justly, for all logical cases.

Obviously, this is a far more complicated scheme than it needs to be; and I have already detailed some of the injustices it would impose. How do we resolve all these issues more simply?

We simply eradicate (real) interest to solve the adverse consequences of interest; and we impose taxation in the most straightforward, justly distributed manner.

How do we do that?

We restore to the individual the right to issue their own promises to pay. We aren’t taking “interest” from the real creditor, who is the producer of the subject property, who accepts the promise to pay as currency… for that producer is denied such “interest” now, by an extrinsic party, which produces the promise of the real debtor at virtually no cost whatever, pretends to loan that to the debtor (only by denying the debtor the right to issue their own promise), and, as if that freely (virtually costlessly) published, obfuscated promise represented earned wealth of the intervening publisher… we pay *the publisher* (of all parties!) the “interest,” instead of the actual creditor (producer of the subject property).

You too in fact are denying the true creditor interest, so what exactly is your justification of interest? (!)

So the simple answer is that mathematically perfected economy? alone sustains the whole necessary relationship of money to represented wealth, without multiplication of debt by interest, and while, the whole while, debtors pay for the wealth they consume, as they consume of it.

In other words, the simple solution is to pay for wealth, only the cost of the wealth, and to pay for taxation according to the separate rules which might determine however we should be paying for taxation. Otherwise, OF COURSE, you’re going to place ridiculous complications upon your preposterous notion of obfuscating a rate of interest to pay for government costs, the burdens of which obviously may never be JUSTLY distributed in any uniform rate of interest, applied yet to further disparate, individual volumes of debt.

The fact is, Ellen, if you sorted all that out, you’d come to the simplest implementation of all:

Should we be able to pay for a house, what the house itself should cost us? Of course, this is a just goal of economy, and therefore of solution.

Should we be able to pay for government services, what those services should cost *us*, regardless of however much we might or might not borrow? Of course as well.

So then, for all cases, there is one way to do this:

Pay for the property you acquire, only the costs of the property; and pay for the costs of government, only what you should have to pay as well ??which obviously, has no consistent, uniform *rate*, relative to however much debt we might assume in whatever we have to do.

When you were asked why not eradicate interest, you simply answered you thought it was too complicated to implement such a system. Of course, you didn’t say how; and I responded in detail how the (unanswered) complications and/or injustices which your proposition imposes comprise a greater set of (redundant) difficulties.

The simpler solution then, *IS* mathematically perfected economy?.

Why?

Because the subjects of the system *do*, in all cases, simply pay for the wealth they consume. If it is a $100,000 home with a 100-year lifespan, they’re paying for the home at the overall rate of $1,000 per year, or $83.33 per month ??the very rate they consume of it. They’re not paying taxes at the same time, for ostensible government services they may or may not consume, and which too, are not necessarily relative/proportional at all to however much the house *should* cost!

Likewise, in the case of *actual* government services they might *elect* to consume, and should pay for to some different proportion or relationship, they simply pay for those services by equally simple processes. How so?

If the usage of roads provided by government is decided to be levied proportional to gasoline consumption, the tax is levied in the cost of gasoline… which *alone* of course, with no complication whatever, determines just payment across the very duration of the consumption of the government service, as you propose to decide rightly by your uniform rate of taxation, instead applied to a wholly disproportionate sum of individual debt!

Not only have you not answered the questions then… the injustices of your system impose greater complication than mathematically perfected economy?.

The difference is not that your proposition is less complicated. The difference is, you don’t account for the further complications, by the simplest answer to all the requisites of a just implementation. The difference is, you don’t provide accountable arguments. You just fire off your idea, without ever establishing even to yourself, that it solves the things you pretend to solve.

RELATED MATERIAL

“To find the players in all the corruption of the world, ‘Follow the money.’ To find the captains of world corruption, follow the money all the way.”

mike montagne ??founder, PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy?, author/engineer of mathematically perfected economy? (1979)

? COPYRIGHT 2008, by mike montagne and PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy?.

Except for profit making ventures or entities otherwise granted explicit permission to publish this copyright material, this article may be distributed or reprinted in whole only, from and including any quotes preceding its title, through and inclusive of the following permalink(s), by email or otherwise. Visitors may also download our entire directory of regular/main site articles from our downloads page: http://perfecteconomy.com/pg-free-pfmpe-downloads.html. If you want to save your country, we encourage personal distribution of this material to all conducive recipients of your personal address books. Of course, you may also send only the following permalink:

http://perfecteconomy.com/wp/2008/12/22/response-to-ellen-hodgson-browns-claim-to-answer-to-the-controversy/

DISCUSS THIS ARTICLE IN THE PFMPE? FORUM:

http://www.perfecteconomy.com/f/viewforum.php?f=22

[END PERMALINK(S)]

Sunday, December 21st, 2008

What should concern us is who stands in the way of solution, and why.

mike montagne

mike montagne REBUTS HYPERINFLATION AS A CAUSE OF AN INEVITABLE, SECOND GREAT DEPRESSION

The idea of national or world-wide monetary failure as a consequence of some ostensible, dramatic manifestation of inflation, conflicts with an eleventh hour, ever growing array of further assertions, submitted likewise without conclusive argument. The conditions we are presently combating, and which are the cause of the mounting failure, on the contrary embody a scarcity of circulation respective to a growing sum of debt, with the resultant collapse being a consequence of a resultant inability to service debt.

As the failure mounted prior to the recent efforts to purportedly rescue the system with increasing artificial infusions of capital, in fact then neither inflation nor hyperinflation can be truly said to be causative, for at best now (both being absent), either can only eventually manifest in the wake of the onset of failure. Thus it is only in understanding the actual, previous causative forces, that we can accurately project further consequences (which may ultimately include inflation). Likewise, it is only by understanding those previous causes that we can develop or identify solution, responding to actual cause (versus the said, eventual consequences).

What is obviously contradictory to a mere assertion of hyperinflation as a present cause then, is that the basic reasons for the present rush to resume sufficient “credit” as will maintain a vital circulation, speaks instead to a perpetual, prevailing deflation of the circulation by present obligations to service the most monumental sums of debt in history. It is this escalating obligation to service an inherent, irreversible, and terminal multiplication of debt then, which in fact is the only present cause of the downturn. Thus the mounting failure is instead manifested from a starvation for sufficient circulation to sustain a diminishing industry, which in fact too, is already largely expatriated by the previous stress of ever escalating indebtedness upon markets and producers alike.

On top of this systemic stress of inherent multiplication of debt, certainly we suffer further stress of downstream exploitation. But the monumental primary obligation to service multiplying indebtedness comprises an escalating deflation, in which servicing the escalating debt perpetually and ever more dramatically depletes the circulation in such a way as can only require ever more borrowing, to replenish the circulation.

The fact of this escalating deflationary process thus obligates any assertion of circulatory inflation as a potential cause of failure, to prove first that the necessarily escalating act of borrowing further, so much as may or may not even replenish the circulation of the deflation, actually prevails in a purported increase in circulation. Secondly, such unqualified assertions are obligated to prove that it is the increasing circulation which actually causes failure, versus the underlying, singular disposition of the imposed system to perpetually multiply debt in proportion to a finite potential to service illimitable debt.

On the contrary then, artificial inflation of the circulation is not a cause of failure at all. Ultimately instead, artificial inflation is the only possible, eventual, systemic recourse against an irreversible systemic process, which, in perpetually re-borrowing so much as would replenish a vital circulation of ever escalating depletion, inherently transforms interest and principal paid out of the general circulation into the very escalating sums of debt which ultimately impose failure. But inflation of any kind or magnitude then is not causative. On the contrary, the very need for artificial inflation, rescues, and so forth, testifies to the cause of failure being irreversible, inherently escalating multiplication of debt. Eventual inflation of any eventual magnitude is a consequence of preserving the system of exploitation, versus establishing mathematically perfected economy?.

The subject currency of course was privatized (versus rectified) for a purpose; and the very disposition of the imposed system therefor is a device to take unearned profit, multiplied at inherently escalating rates. Only because the device of taking is itself irreversible so long as it exists, does the usually (but not necessarily) privatized system ultimately impose such a sum of debt that the subjects cannot afford to borrow further as would otherwise enable them to replenish the circulation against its perpetually escalating deflation.

Failure therefore is an inevitable culmination of this systemic, irreversible multiplication of debt in proportion to the obligated circulation; with ever more massive inflation being a consequence both of inherent systemic failure, and a public which fails to recognize and adopt solution.

The system of exploitation thus fails for a simple combination of inevitable events:

  1. Merely to maintain a vital circulation, the subjects are inevitably compelled to perpetually re-borrow principal and interest paid out of the general circulation, as subsequent sums of debt, perpetually increased so much as periodic interest on an ever greater sum of debt.

  2. The sum of debt thus multiplies at an ever escalating rate, requiring ever more monumental further borrowing, merely to maintain a circulation.

  3. All the while, ever more of the obligated circulation is dedicated to servicing debt, leaving ever less of the circulation to sustain the industry which is obligated to do so.

  4. Ultimately then, an eventual sum of debt exceeds the finite capacity of industry to service it, which in turn exceeds a limit of credit-worthiness which the artificially indebted public can in fact service.

  5. Because they can service no further debt, they cannot borrow further, as remains necessary to replenish the circulation of the deflation ??which in turn results in depletion of the circulation across their final days of servicing the existent sum of debt.

  6. With the inability to borrow further to replenish the circulation, and with the primary obligation being to service debt (versus sustain industry), this depletion further makes it impossible to sustain the industry which is obligated to service the debt.

  7. As failing sectors quickly take down multiple dependent sectors, the failure of the first important sectors soon escalate into complete failure, in which the falling subjects are only further compromised to maintain a sustainable circulation by taking on the further debt which they are already proven unable to afford.

Thus opposed to this proposition that hyperinflation will cause the present failure, the nature of the currency which Jefferson, Franklin, Adams, Madison, Jackson, Lincoln, McFadden and so many others of this caliber warned against, is the cause of a sudden and inevitable depletion, in which a mortal, final period of servicing a terminal sum of debt deflates the circulation, leaving the subjects unworthy of borrowing further, simply because the fatal sum of debt can only multiply their obligations above what they already cannot service.

If anything then, hyperinflation will only eventually manifest from artificial attempts to preserve a process which still, will continue to inherently and irreversibly multiply debt in proportion to the obligated circulation, as will only allow pathetic subjects to marginally tread water against the eventual culmination in failure.

All this of course was projected thirty years ago, not only in my proposition of mathematically perfected economy?, but in computer models I provided the Reagan Administration which projected the accumulation of this debt, manifesting in potential world wide failure at approximately 2010 AD. Now curiously, even those who argued most against this idea of inevitable failure and singular solution, lay claim to eleventh hour projections which still yet deny recognition of what they argued against, both as the inevitable cause of failure and singular basis solution ??and the only veritable thing therefore from which anyone can truly predict the failure they boast only now of predicting.

There is one and one integral solution only for 1)?inflation and deflation, 2)?systemic manipulation of the cost or value of money or property, and 3)?inherent, irreversible, and inevitably terminal multiplication of debt in proportion to the vital, obligated circulation ??and the only reason you won’t have that solution is the very pretended representatives you have chosen, remain the very people most dedicated to your exploitation.

Visit http://www.change.gov/page/s/yourvision to pressure the Obama Transition Team to adopt mathematically perfected economy?. I’m aware the president-elect is hiring all the wrong people; but the fact you demanded representation when you could draws the line between the bad guys ??and the rest. Make sure you mention mathematically perfected economy? explicitly (maybe even providing a link to these pages), or your appeal may be lost in the ever escalating number of late comers who pretend to advocate a solution which existed long before them.

RELATED MATERIAL

“To find the players in all the corruption of the world, ‘Follow the money.’ To find the captains of world corruption, follow the money all the way.”

mike montagne ??founder, PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy?, author/engineer of mathematically perfected economy? (1979)

? COPYRIGHT 2008, by mike montagne and PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy?.

Except for profit making ventures or entities otherwise granted explicit permission to publish this copyright material, this article may be distributed or reprinted in whole only, from and including any quotes preceding its title, through and inclusive of the following permalink(s), by email or otherwise. Visitors may also download our entire directory of regular/main site articles from our downloads page: http://perfecteconomy.com/pg-free-pfmpe-downloads.html. If you want to save your country, we encourage personal distribution of this material to all conducive recipients of your personal address books. Of course, you may also send only the following permalink:

http://perfecteconomy.com/wp/2008/12/21/mike-montagne-rebuts-hyperinflation-as-a-cause-of-an-inevitable-second-great-depression/

DISCUSS THIS ARTICLE IN THE PFMPE? FORUM:

http://www.perfecteconomy.com/f/viewtopic.php?f=80&t=202&p=489#p489

[END PERMALINK(S)]

Friday, December 19th, 2008

What should concern us is who stands in the way of solution, and why.

mike montagne

CREDO ACTION CLAIMS BUSH MUST ACT TO STOP PLANT CLOSINGS

President Bush is turning a blind eye to our crumbling economy.
http://act.credoaction.com/r/?r=2545&id=1919-960205-FzxbQ0x&t=8

Stand up for working families.
http://act.credoaction.com/r/?r=2545&id=1919-960205-FzxbQ0x&t=9
Chrysler and GM have already laid off thousands of workers while President Bush sits on his hands. We need swift, decisive action to save our economy — January 20th is just too late.

The Bush Administration has invested almost $300 billion in Wall Street with little to show for it. Last week, after Republicans in the Senate blocked temporary assistance for General Motors and Chrysler, Mr. Bush said he would step in to help. Since then, he has been busy visiting Iraq and Afghanistan, and signing special midnight regulations that harm the public interest. Somehow, he has not had time to work out a way to help the hundreds of thousands of auto workers. He is still “weighing his options”.

So this week, both General Motors and Chrysler have announced that they are shutting down just about all of their factories for the next month. With foreclosures, bankruptcies, and layoff announcements at levels not seen since the Depression, it is time for Mr. Bush to act. We all know that the management of the auto companies has been just about the worst of any American industry. We know that Detroit has to start making fuel efficient cars that every day people want to buy. And we know that Detroit should not use any assistance to lobby against clean air or fuel efficiency laws.

A new administration will take office in a little over a month. The economy simply cannot wait that long.

Click here to send an e-mail to President Bush right now. Tell him that working families need his help, and turning a blind eye isn’t getting the job done.
http://act.credoaction.com/r/?r=2545&id=1919-960205-FzxbQ0x&t=11

Thank you for working to build a better world.

Kate Stayman-London, Campaign Manager
CREDO Action
http://act.credoaction.com/r/?r=10&id=1919-960205-FzxbQ0x&t=12
from Working Assets

Kate Stayman-London, Campaign Manager for CREDO Action, emails us that Bush must act to avoid auto plant closings. What you need to understand Kate, is that the way Bush (or Obama) will “act,” is to charge us beyond what we already cannot afford to pay, with even yourself presuming this is sustainable. What you really need to understand and to promote then, Kate, is the immediate adoption of mathematically perfected economy?.

Since it’s a foregone conclusion that in the interest of preserving the system of exploitation, Obama and Bush are going to stand in the way of mathematically perfected economy?, you might at least use these links to urge Kate to advocate a real solution.

Visit http://www.change.gov/page/s/yourvision to pressure the Obama Transition Team to adopt mathematically perfected economy?. I’m aware the president-elect is hiring all the wrong people; but the fact you demanded representation when you could draws the line between the bad guys ??and the rest. Make sure you mention mathematically perfected economy? explicitly (maybe even providing a link to these pages), or your appeal may be lost in the ever escalating number of late comers who pretend to advocate a solution which existed long before them.

RELATED MATERIAL

“To find the players in all the corruption of the world, ‘Follow the money.’ To find the captains of world corruption, follow the money all the way.”

mike montagne ??founder, PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy?, author/engineer of mathematically perfected economy? (1979)

? COPYRIGHT 2008, by mike montagne and PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy?.

Except for profit making ventures or entities otherwise granted explicit permission to publish this copyright material, this article may be distributed or reprinted in whole only, from and including any quotes preceding its title, through and inclusive of the following permalink(s), by email or otherwise. Visitors may also download our entire directory of regular/main site articles from our downloads page: http://perfecteconomy.com/pg-free-pfmpe-downloads.html. If you want to save your country, we encourage personal distribution of this material to all conducive recipients of your personal address books. Of course, you may also send only the following permalink:

http://perfecteconomy.com/wp/2008/12/19/credo-action-claims-bush-must-act-to-stop-plant-closings/

DISCUSS THIS ARTICLE IN THE PFMPE? FORUM:

http://www.perfecteconomy.com/f/viewforum.php?f=22

[END PERMALINK(S)]

Friday, December 19th, 2008

What should concern us is who stands in the way of solution, and why.

mike montagne

KUDOS AND SOLUTION FOR ECUADOREAN PRESIDENT CORREA

Thanks to Mario Sikorski, Poland:

Ecuadorean President Rafael Correa officially announced that he will not be making the interest payments on his foreign bonds. The country has officially defaulted on its debt obligations. This is the second Ecuadorean default in ten years.

“I have given the order that interest payments not be made,” Correa said. “The country is in default.”

Source: http://www.chartingstocks.net/2008/12/ecuador-defaults/

Correa Defaults on Ecuador Bonds, Seeks Restructuring
Bloomberg - 19 hours ago
12 (Bloomberg) — Ecuadorean President Rafael Correa halted payment on foreign bonds he calls ?illegal? and ?illegitimate,? putting the South American …
Ecuador Defaults on Foreign Debt Upside Down World
Ecuador Declares Foreign Debt Moratorium Prensa Latina
Ecuador Drops the Money Ball: President Correa Threatens to Stiff … The Indypendent Australian

The solution for Mr. Correa (and the rest of the world) is simple:

Ecuador has simply allowed usurers to pose as creditors (producers), and to issue irredeemable promises to pay of the real debtor(s), at ever greater cost to all, and eventual collapse under terminal sums of debt.

Mr. Correa *CAN* therefore pay their debts; and it may take more balls *NOT* to do so.

What he needs to consider is making a “good faith” (equally good faith) gesture to “repay” “the debt” by issuing an equivalently legal irredeemable promise to pay. Whatever “the debt” is, scribble out on a piece of payer, “Will pay you bastards, whatever you bastards say the debt is at any moment.” Sign the equivalent irredeemable promise to pay as the legitimate representative of the Ecuadorean people, and *VOLUNTEER TO GO TO COURT*!

The world *WILL* be watching… The revolution *WILL* be televised… and the issue *WILL* be a) inherent, irreversible multiplication of debt in proportion to the circulation, to inevitable collapse under terminal debt; b) the equivalence of the irredeemable promises to pay; and c) singular solution (or the crime against the people).

Meanwhile, re-finance all debt without interest, and re-schedule payment to the rate of depreciation/consumption; re-publish to the people their losses (such as savings for retirement) suffered under usury; and sustain all that with mathematically perfected economy?.

If Mr. Correa is afraid “the U.S.” (mis-directed, usurped resources of the U.S.) will take him down… then simply resign after doing all this in one day. Let the world watch while the mis-directed, usurped resources of the U.S. are wrongly applied to setting up another puppet government to sustain usury; *THEN* the world will understand the scope and nature of the whole problem.

Visit http://www.change.gov/page/s/yourvision to pressure the Obama Transition Team to adopt mathematically perfected economy?. I’m aware the president-elect is hiring all the wrong people; but the fact you demanded representation when you could draws the line between the bad guys ??and the rest. Make sure you mention mathematically perfected economy? explicitly (maybe even providing a link to these pages), or your appeal may be lost in the ever escalating number of late comers who pretend to advocate a solution which existed long before them.

RELATED MATERIAL

“To find the players in all the corruption of the world, ‘Follow the money.’ To find the captains of world corruption, follow the money all the way.”

mike montagne ??founder, PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy?, author/engineer of mathematically perfected economy? (1979)

? COPYRIGHT 2008, by mike montagne and PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy?.

Except for profit making ventures or entities otherwise granted explicit permission to publish this copyright material, this article may be distributed or reprinted in whole only, from and including any quotes preceding its title, through and inclusive of the following permalink(s), by email or otherwise. Visitors may also download our entire directory of regular/main site articles from our downloads page: http://perfecteconomy.com/pg-free-pfmpe-downloads.html. If you want to save your country, we encourage personal distribution of this material to all conducive recipients of your personal address books. Of course, you may also send only the following permalink:

http://perfecteconomy.com/wp/2008/12/19/kudos-and-solution-for-ecuadorean-president-correa/

DISCUSS THIS ARTICLE IN THE PFMPE? FORUM:

http://www.perfecteconomy.com/f/viewtopic.php?f=22&t=243

[END PERMALINK(S)]

Friday, December 19th, 2008

ENGINEERING A TRUE ECONOMY

Imagine that you are designing the first combustion engine:

A prototype finally starts. It sputters; it coughs. It stumbles.

You envisioned smooth delivery of power ??efficient power. Your very initial objective was to achieve full possible power. So is an engine to cough? Is an engine barely to run?

No one would ever have built a decent engine if we exclaimed only how wonderful all the “running” amidst all the first sputtering.

Imposition of a central banking system on true free enterprise runs quite the opposite course. It takes a free running engine and irreversibly multiplies its debt until it can run no more. That it ran in the first place, that it ran for some time, and that it improved its production at times even faster than usury imposed ever greater oppression is no testament to the ostensible merits of usury; nor does it prove the subject commerce can sustain itself against the multiplying costs of debt forever.

In fact commerce is finite; and a system which can only multiply debt in proportion to commerce can only eventually exceed the capacity of finite commerce to support infinite, irreversible multiplication of debt in proportion to a circulation. Indeed, as ever more of such a circulation must be dedicated to servicing the multiplying debt, ever less of the circulation remains to sustain commerce.

The inherent collapse of a central banking system therefore approaches at an ever escalating rate, as the subject commerce struggles against all the malignant consequences of servicing perpetual multiplication of debt in proportion to the potential commerce which can survive to do so.

mike montagne

LOAN MODIFICATION ??DOING THE LEAST, ONLY TO EXTEND EXPLOITATION

A “new industry” springs up amongst us, purportedly adding to the sum of prosperity by a specialization called only “loan modification.” We receive email every day, pleading to enlist the ostensible service of this productless industry, which in fact only negates as little as possible of the destructive ramifications of “interest,” that “the economy” can endure for the maximal unearned taking of the overall system of exploitation.

The plea of course then is not a plea for solution, even as it inadvertently testifies that wherever usurpers are allowed to pose as creditors (producers), to issue the promises of debtors at the cost of ever multiplying indebtedness, terminal debt is inevitable.

“Loan modification” therefore vindicates the thesis of mathematically perfected economy?, that any purported economy subject to “interest” ultimately terminates itself under insoluble debt, as it is inevitably impossible merely to maintain a vital circulation without re-borrowing the interest and principal we pay out of the general circulation… as subsequent sums of debt, perpetually increased in proportion to the obligated circulation, so much as periodic interest.

How then do we know our pretended political representatives are our enemies?

Because if you wanted either to restore free enterprise or to establish economic justice, you would restore our right to issue our own promises to pay; no private institution would be elevated above all others, to publish costless tokens of wealth, subject to purposed terms which can only multiply debt into terminal debt ??all along the way, abusing the unassenting subjects to ever greater degrees of dispossession.

Why are we subject to “loan modification”?

Because the usurped government does not and will not serve us. Given the option of free enterprise, we would choose it. Given the option to free ourselves from the imposed system of exploitation, we would choose mathematically perfected economy?, because it is the only solution to 1)?inflation and deflation, 2)?systemic manipulation of the cost or value of money or property, and 3)?inherent, irreversible, and inevitably terminal multiplication of debt in proportion to the vital, obligated circulation.

We are denied even the dialog which would lead to solution. Why? Because the money changers own the media, “our” government, “our” candidates, and because they of course intend to continue denying us all the things which might lead to rectification ??because rectification means their end.

Visit http://www.change.gov/page/s/yourvision to pressure the Obama Transition Team to adopt mathematically perfected economy?. I’m aware the president-elect is hiring all the wrong people; but the fact you demanded representation when you could draws the line between the bad guys ??and the rest. Make sure you mention mathematically perfected economy? explicitly (maybe even providing a link to these pages), or your appeal may be lost in the ever escalating number of late comers who pretend to advocate a solution which existed long before them.

RELATED MATERIAL

“To find the players in all the corruption of the world, ‘Follow the money.’ To find the captains of world corruption, follow the money all the way.”

mike montagne ??founder, PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy?, author/engineer of mathematically perfected economy? (1979)

? COPYRIGHT 2008, by mike montagne and PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy?.

Except for profit making ventures or entities otherwise granted explicit permission to publish this copyright material, this article may be distributed or reprinted in whole only, from and including any quotes preceding its title, through and inclusive of the following permalink(s), by email or otherwise. Visitors may also download our entire directory of regular/main site articles from our downloads page: http://perfecteconomy.com/pg-free-pfmpe-downloads.html. If you want to save your country, we encourage personal distribution of this material to all conducive recipients of your personal address books. Of course, you may also send only the following permalink:

http://perfecteconomy.com/wp/2008/12/19/loan-modification-doing-the-least-only-to-extend-exploitation/

DISCUSS THIS ARTICLE IN THE PFMPE? FORUM:

http://www.perfecteconomy.com/f/viewforum.php?f=22

[END PERMALINK(S)]

Thursday, December 18th, 2008

What should concern us is who stands in the way of solution, and why.

mike montagne

NYT ??FED CUTS KEY RATE TO RECORD LOW, VALIDATES MATHEMATICALLY PERFECTED ECONOMY?

The Federal Reserve entered a new era on Tuesday, lowering its benchmark interest rate virtually to zero and declaring that it would now fight the recession by pumping out vast amounts of money to businesses and consumers through an expanding array of new lending programs.

Yesterday, the private “Federal” “Reserve” “Banks” lowered the lending rate for new/further money to a new/record low. Except that this action preserves the system of exploitation, and the majority of the monumental debt and interest obligations already accumulated under it, this curious minimalization of interest rates unmysteriously replicates to the greatest degree otherwise possible, the principles I advocated in my 1979 prescription for saving a pretended economy subject to such a currency, and most recently in the PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy? page, If I Were President ??how to arrest world wide monetary collapse in a day.

In other words, recognizing that perpetual multiplication of debt by interest has indeed manifested in terminal sums of debt as the thesis of mathematically perfected economy? projected 30 years ago, the publishers of the unconstitutional, privatized currency are seeking to preserve their system of exploitation a while longer, by effectively refinancing as much debt as possible at near zero interest rates. The fact this unassented, imposed system has produced such terminal sums of debt therefore validates our original thesis a)?that any pretended economy subject to interest ultimately terminates itself under insoluble debt, and b)?that there is one and one only integral solution to 1)?inflation and deflation, 2)?systemic manipulation of the cost or value of money or property, and 3)?inherent, irreversible, and inevitably terminal multiplication of debt in proportion to the vital, obligated circulation.

What the so called federal reserve banks are doing therefore is purposely refraining from saving the demise of our prosperity to the full degree that they could; with the sole purpose of this pretended service being to preserve the system of exploitation, so that should we rise to our knees during the onset of depression, they preserve to themselves (likewise without our assent) the power to drum us into the ground with a healthy dose of “interest.”

Of course, the monumental sums of debt which will not be relieved of previous interest obligations will nonetheless require still escalating (and sustained) rates of borrowing (just as this development does), merely to maintain a vital circulation as we pay the costs of servicing the terminal sum of debt out of circulation.

Likewise, interest will continue to multiply debt in proportion to the obligated circulation, albeit at slower rates, which will expand the duration of the collapse. Moreover, the so called federal reserve banks remain closed to restoring to us all that we have lost not just in the recent manifestation of the failure, but all along the way. There is no recognition of injustice, nor any intention to establish full justice. All we have is preservation of the system of exploitation, at whatever further cost these unassented, usurious institutions intend to impose upon us.

Why then does the so called Federal Reserve, which is not even an authorized branch of government, not save “the economy” to the full degree that is possible?

The so called federal reserve does not save “the economy” to the full degree that is possible, because it is strictly a parasite, the purpose of which has always been and will always be to prey upon “the economy” to the fullest degree possible.

As surely as its recent actions validate mathematically perfected economy? then, nonetheless, the parasite will resume its taking as soon as its subject shows sufficient signs of life ??marginalizing the host as it always has and always will.

After all, if that weren’t its intention, it would give us mathematically perfected economy?, wouldn’t it?

Visit http://www.change.gov/page/s/yourvision to pressure the Obama Transition Team to adopt mathematically perfected economy?. I’m aware the president-elect is hiring all the wrong people; but the fact you demanded representation when you could draws the line between the bad guys ??and the rest. Make sure you mention mathematically perfected economy? explicitly (maybe even providing a link to these pages), or your appeal may be lost in the ever escalating number of late comers who pretend to advocate a solution which existed long before them.

RELATED MATERIAL

“To find the players in all the corruption of the world, ‘Follow the money.’ To find the captains of world corruption, follow the money all the way.”

mike montagne ??founder, PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy?, author/engineer of mathematically perfected economy? (1979)

? COPYRIGHT 2008, by mike montagne and PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy?.

Except for profit making ventures or entities otherwise granted explicit permission to publish this copyright material, this article may be distributed or reprinted in whole only, from and including any quotes preceding its title, through and inclusive of the following permalink(s), by email or otherwise. Visitors may also download our entire directory of regular/main site articles from our downloads page: http://perfecteconomy.com/pg-free-pfmpe-downloads.html. If you want to save your country, we encourage personal distribution of this material to all conducive recipients of your personal address books. Of course, you may also send only the following permalink:

http://perfecteconomy.com/wp/2008/12/18/nyt-fed-cuts-key-rate-to-record-low-validates-mathematically-perfected-economy/

DISCUSS THIS ARTICLE IN THE PFMPE? FORUM:

http://www.perfecteconomy.com/f/viewforum.php?f=22

[END PERMALINK(S)]

Thursday, December 18th, 2008

What should concern us is who stands in the way of solution, and why.

mike montagne

mike montagne RESPONDS TO PAUL JOSEPH WATSON’S HYPERINFLATION ASSERTION AT TRUTHNEWS

This article responds to Paul Joseph Watson’s article at TruthNews.US (“Trends Forecaster Celente: Greece-Style Riots Coming To U.S.”), in which he asserts:

“Frighteningly accurate trends forecaster Gerald Celente says that America will see riots similar to those currently ongoing in Greece and that the cause will be a hyper-inflationary depression, leading to the inevitable use of troops and mercenaries to deal with the crisis as Americans are incarcerated in internment camps.”

When even the formerly wealthy can go hungry in a few days… and obviously, as that hunger can radically revise their immediate temperament… the “possibility” of riots which Mr. Celente pretends to project is only an obvious probability which certainly doesn’t lend itself to a rightful claim of visionary power.

Crime or unrest, however much the people may be deprived of alternatives, will of course rise dramatically as the nonchalant further neglect the causes of the terminal phases of the system of exploitation. It is not even reasonable now to say that we are forecasting such things, because of course we’ve already seen years of escalating credit fraud, banking fraud, derivatives fraud, bubble fraud, and particularly, governmental fraud, as the deprived are pushed over the edge and as the system of exploitation seeks to preserve itself against its irreversible disposition to produce its own demise of terminal indebtedness.

People are not doing these things merely as a matter of creative impulse. The fact this unassented system’s multiplication of indebtedness undoes all that we can do, together with the further fact irreversible, artificial multiplication of indebtedness dispossesses us of whatever wealth we try to produce, leaves us ever more disposed to fight the unjust system however we might deem we can. This very unjust deprivation therefore pushes more and more of us toward finding ways to survive what are not normal circumstances, but wholly artificial ones, imposed not by prolific availability of currency, but on the contrary, by expiration of the circulation, while we remain obligated to continue servicing the greatest, perpetually, dynamically multiplying proportions of artificial indebtedness in history.

We cannot beat the system. It can only beat us. Thus, with riots and further obviously probable consequences aside… we can readily eliminate the causes of further unrest ahead, if we adopt solution. Furthermore, we can only adopt solution if we understand the actual causes we are to solve ??as opposed to the flawed citation of cause from which Mr. Celente could never have actually projected failure. We are already in his projected failure; and his cause of failure doesn’t even exist.

Mr. Celente’s “projection” asserts the very opposite of present facts. He tells us that we are suffering inflation. Traditionally, and technically therefore, this means circulatory inflation ??that is, increases in the circulation per the wealth it should be intended only to represent. While Alex Jones promotes the idea that price inflation (increasing prices) are attributable to this non-existent circulatory inflation, in fact the only systemic cause of price inflation is inherent multiplication of indebtedness into terminal indebtedness, as we are forced to try to maintain a vital circulation by re-borrowing principal and interest paid out of the general circulation as ever greater sums of debt. It is the inherently and irreversibly increasing sum of indebtedness therefore which is the systemic cause of perpetually increases prices.

We cannot understand this simple process by simply decrying that ever greater sums of money are being introduced to the circulation, because of course ever greater sums of currency are exiting the system in servicing the ever escalating sum of debt; and therefore because, it is the predominant disparity toward deflation which is responsible for greater depletion of the circulation, and it is the monumental sum of artificial indebtedness which prevents us from remaining so credit-worthy as to borrow further, as necessary to replenish the circulation. The result is deflation ??ever less “money” than before, and ever less capacity to sustain industry, and to survive, than before.

This obvious, contrary fact of circulatory deflation of course is expressed in the purposely ambiguous form of reports that “credit is drying up.”

In other words, the adulterated nature of the currency has so compromised credit-worthiness by multiplication of debt toward the ultimate terminal sum of debt, that credit cannot be issued, simply because the subject populace is already over-stressed to its limits servicing the existent sums of debt. There isn’t an actual “shortage” of credit (currency) however, because “credit” in fact is illimitable when you have a license to print money “out of thin air.”

The problem of course is not this inexpensiveness of creating the currency, for inexpensive tokens of value are an advantage in a system can preserve the value of money, such as mathematically perfected economy? and mathematically perfected economy? alone. On the contrary, the problem is the adulteration of money’s nature as a token of value ??the problem is that “privatization” of the currency purposely usurps real producer’s role as creditors, to issue the promises of the debtor at cost to the debtor, and no cost to the usurer. It is this purposed obfuscation of “interest” which attaches, for the purpose of exploitation, the very process which serves exploitation alone, by perpetually multiplying debt. There is no actual lending of “money,” for all the promises of the debtors (notes) are simply issued at virtually no cost. No real, earned wealth whatever is at risk, because “the money” is merely published at virtually no cost whatever.

So there is no actual justification of “interest”; there is simply the pretension that earned wealth is at stake; and the opportunity to do all this is imposed by usurping the role of creditor to issue the promises of the debtor.

In the end of the finite lifespan of every such system, as further “credit” increases the sum of debt beyond the limits of credit-worthiness, there is simply no remaining basis for the further credit which is necessary to replenish the circulation of the principal and interest we are paying out of circulation.

Thus the circulation *deflates* as we service the *terminal* sum of debt and cannot borrow further, which *terminal* sum of debt, because it exceeds the limits of credit-worthiness, precludes the assumption of further credit ??which is vital to replenishing the circulation.

So no, Mr. Watson, Mr. Jones, and Mr. Celente; the failure has not been caused by circulatory inflation.

On the contrary in fact, there is no theoretical or factual basis to Mr. Celente?s assertion of hyperinflation. Hyperinflation can only transpire when/if the money changers recognize the system is unrecoverable; and it can only transpire even then by breaking the rules of the imposed system itself, for the system has made us unworthy of servicing further debt.

Only by breaking the rules further may they pour money on the fire. But of course, even so, there?s no power in that to rectify the fatal sum of debt already assumed by the subjects of the system. However feeding the fire comes down (if it comes down), its success will be limited by whatever sectors of the system cannot be saved from immediate overstressing. Those sectors will fail; and they will bring adjacent, dependent sectors down with them.

So of course, the present failure of housing, “securities,” etc. ??all of which are only facades of prosperity ??already comprises blows sufficient to manifest in the death knell of the system of exploitation.

Visit http://www.change.gov/page/s/yourvision to pressure the Obama Transition Team to adopt mathematically perfected economy?. I’m aware the president-elect is hiring all the wrong people; but the fact you demanded representation when you could draws the line between the bad guys ??and the rest. Make sure you mention mathematically perfected economy? explicitly (maybe even providing a link to these pages), or your appeal may be lost in the ever escalating number of late comers who pretend to advocate a solution which existed long before them.

RELATED MATERIAL

“To find the players in all the corruption of the world, ‘Follow the money.’ To find the captains of world corruption, follow the money all the way.”

mike montagne ??founder, PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy?, author/engineer of mathematically perfected economy? (1979)

? COPYRIGHT 2008, by mike montagne and PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy?.

Except for profit making ventures or entities otherwise granted explicit permission to publish this copyright material, this article may be distributed or reprinted in whole only, from and including any quotes preceding its title, through and inclusive of the following permalink(s), by email or otherwise. Visitors may also download our entire directory of regular/main site articles from our downloads page: http://perfecteconomy.com/pg-free-pfmpe-downloads.html. If you want to save your country, we encourage personal distribution of this material to all conducive recipients of your personal address books. Of course, you may also send only the following permalink:

http://perfecteconomy.com/wp/2008/12/18/mike-montagne-responds-to-paul-joseph-watsons-hyperinflation-assertion-at-truthnews/

DISCUSS THIS ARTICLE IN THE PFMPE? FORUM:

http://www.perfecteconomy.com/f/viewforum.php?f=22

[END PERMALINK(S)]

Monday, December 15th, 2008

What should concern us is who stands in the way of solution, and why.

mike montagne

THANKS TO LARRY BECRAFT FOR INTERVIEWING PFMPE? ON LIBERTY’S ANVIL RADIO

A warm thanks to Constitutional Lawyer, long time patriot movement leader, and “Liberty’s Anvil” radio talk show host, Larry Becraft, for dedicating this past Wednesday’s show to mathematically perfected economy?. The show was aired live, this past Wednesday at 2:00 PM on subscription based “Micro Effect” radio, which can be accessed from the web at http://www.themicroeffect.com/broadcastschedule2.php. Search for Larry Becraft at Liberty’s Anvil.

RELATED MATERIAL

“To find the players in all the corruption of the world, ‘Follow the money.’ To find the captains of world corruption, follow the money all the way.”

mike montagne ??founder, PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy?, author/engineer of mathematically perfected economy? (1979)

? COPYRIGHT 2008, by mike montagne and PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy?.

Except for profit making ventures or entities otherwise granted explicit permission to publish this copyright material, this article may be distributed or reprinted in whole only, from and including any quotes preceding its title, through and inclusive of the following permalink(s), by email or otherwise. Visitors may also download our entire directory of regular/main site articles from our downloads page: http://perfecteconomy.com/pg-free-pfmpe-downloads.html. If you want to save your country, we encourage personal distribution of this material to all conducive recipients of your personal address books. Of course, you may also send only the following permalink:

http://perfecteconomy.com/wp/2008/12/15/thanks-to-larry-becraft-for-interviewing-pfmpe-on-libertys-anvil-radio/

DISCUSS THIS ARTICLE IN THE PFMPE? FORUM:

http://www.perfecteconomy.com/f/viewforum.php?f=22

[END PERMALINK(S)]

Monday, December 15th, 2008

What should concern us is who stands in the way of solution, and why.

mike montagne

RESPONSE TO SOCIALIST APPEALS AT ICH KUCINICH TEAM ARTICLE

This article responds to comments advocating socialism at the Information Clearing House article, “What is to be Done? The End of the Washington Consensus,” co-authored by Dennis Kucinich chief economic adviser, Michael Hudson, together with professor Jeffrey Sommers of Raritan Valley College, NJ.

You know, you have to be suspicious when anyone who identifies neither the subverted form of present capitalism, the cause of its fall, or the solution of the present improprieties, advocates socialism as the solution, without even prescribing just how that would be.

What we have here is a subversion and eradication of free enterprise. That doesn’t disprove real free enterprise, which we in fact are denied; and socialism likewise denies me the freedom to engage in the industry and style of my choice.

While so called socialism may have succeeded in restoring to the people together, property taken by exploitation or plutocracy, neither does socialism have any structure to sustain free enterprise.

If you don’t believe in free enterprise, *for yourself*, that’s your business. But when you believe in denying it *to me*, that’s an offense against me.

As I said, we do not have free enterprise. We have what the founders called broadly, “involuntary servitude,” and particularly, the form of involuntary servitude is imposed by way of a currency which can only multiply debt, as a vehicle for ever escalating exploitation.

The issue therefore is to eradicate the involuntary servitude and other means of exploitation. As my earlier post states, the principal and terminal issue is the unassented and unlawful form of the currency.

So that’s pretty simple. But it’s a far cry from circumstances which could ever be rectified by socialism ??particularly at the cost of true free enterprise.

Now, if you want on the other hand to offer cooperative industry or services such as “insurance,” nothing in mathematically perfected economy prevents you from doing so. Still of course, you’re doing so only as a matter of free choice; and if you succeed, you will succeed by equaling or exceeding what other free enterprise may deliver by whatever organization they choose.

Even socialism requires a monetary system; and if the monetary system is flawed, you suffer the consequences. But you don’t gain anything or provide anything by forcing your system of organization on others. Seek to impose your organization on me, and, like the present unassented monetary systems of the world, you make yourself the enemy of anyone who wants and deserves to do otherwise. If your advocated organization is indeed better, there is no legitimate reason to impose your experiment on the rest of us, who may know better ??and particularly, who may well know better how to solve the real problems before us, versus giving us the mere slogans of other enemies of real freedom.

Visit http://www.change.gov/page/s/yourvision to pressure the Obama Transition Team to adopt mathematically perfected economy?. I’m aware the president-elect is hiring all the wrong people; but the fact you demanded representation when you could draws the line between the bad guys ??and the rest. Make sure you mention mathematically perfected economy? explicitly (maybe even providing a link to these pages), or your appeal may be lost in the ever escalating number of late comers who pretend to advocate a solution which existed long before them.

RELATED MATERIAL

“To find the players in all the corruption of the world, ‘Follow the money.’ To find the captains of world corruption, follow the money all the way.”

mike montagne ??founder, PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy?, author/engineer of mathematically perfected economy? (1979)

? COPYRIGHT 2008, by mike montagne and PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy?.

Except for profit making ventures or entities otherwise granted explicit permission to publish this copyright material, this article may be distributed or reprinted in whole only, from and including any quotes preceding its title, through and inclusive of the following permalink(s), by email or otherwise. Visitors may also download our entire directory of regular/main site articles from our downloads page: http://perfecteconomy.com/pg-free-pfmpe-downloads.html. If you want to save your country, we encourage personal distribution of this material to all conducive recipients of your personal address books. Of course, you may also send only the following permalink:

http://perfecteconomy.com/wp/2008/12/15/response-to-socialist-appeals-at-ich-kucinich-team-article/

DISCUSS THIS ARTICLE IN THE PFMPE? FORUM:

http://www.perfecteconomy.com/f/viewforum.php?f=22

[END PERMALINK(S)]

Saturday, December 13th, 2008

What should concern us is who stands in the way of solution, and why.

mike montagne

HILLARY’S CAMPAIGN LIE ??REGARDING CLEANING UP THE MESS

Anyone who has followed these pages for the last fifteen or twenty years knows I’ve been advocating mathematically perfected economy? for a long while, that I’ve demonstrated the consequences of the imposed system over that whole while, and that I’ve done my best to hold purported representatives accountable.

During the recent campaign, Senator Hillary Clinton boasted often that it took a Clinton to clean up the mess left by the first Bush, and that it would take a Clinton to clean up the mess left by the second. She boasted also that her husband presided over the false and failed bubble of the Dot Com era, telling us again and again that this was the greatest industrial expansion of modern history.

Where were you, if you actually think so?

The thing Mrs. Clinton refers to by such obtuse terms as a “mess,” is also a lie.

I’m not about to defend George Bush, who is perhaps the worst president in our history. It’s difficult for me to imagine we could suffer worse. Bush of course did compound or escalate the demise of our country by failing to arrest the causes of our monetary failure. But what we need to understand is it is not the President per se which simply multiplies our national, public and private debt. It is the system; and without a President, Congress, and/or Supreme Court which abide by the law, and are friendly to actual solution, so we will only have more of the same.

In any case, many of us believe the Bill Clinton (and now, Hillary Clinton) lie, that Mr. Clinton balanced the federal budget. If in fact he did do so, how did he do so?

There of course was no real increase in public income, for ten years after the fact only a handful of survivors of the supposed Dot Com boom actually had made a penny of profit, while real industry was expatriated from the country. There was no increase in tax rates or revenues, for our industry was so marginalized already, and so posed to take the fall it would suffer under the subsequent Bush Administration, that we could not have afforded increased tax rates, or increased interest rates either. Nor was there a commensurable decrease in federal spending.

How then could there have been a balancing of the federal budget? Well, any *genuine* accountant would tell that there couldn’t have been.

So this “cleaning up” of a “mess” which Hillary Clinton so falsely boasts of is something we’re going to endure under the present administration, which she of course will gladly participate in ??not of course to solve the problems or causes of inevitable failure, but to preserve the very system of exploitation which is responsible for our inevitable collapse.

You remember of course that Bill Clinton raided other federal assets to claim he had balanced the budget, much as states are now selling assets the people paid for merely to pretend accountability under a system of inevitable failure, which all the puppets of the plutocracy work to preserve upon us. What was the consequence of Mr. Clinton’s robbing Peter to pay Paul?

The math differs according to sources, but some estimates are that the consequence to so called social security was so devastating that as much as over a hundred trillion dollars of near term, unfunded federal liabilities exist in the wake of those robberies. Just on the account of the lie of social security then, the Clinton’s mis-doings, which Hillary Clinton now calls “cleaning up a mess,” have imposed a hundred-trillion “dollars” of liability on future generations, which Mrs. and Mr. Clinton merely refrain from calling a debt, to falsely claim they balanced the federal budget.

How does this shake out?

Largely it appeals to the eldest generation, who are the last to maintain any false faith in the guilty parties ??but only of course for their own sakes. This misdoing has kept the co-perpetrators voting for the powers that be from either party of betrayal; and this pathetic prevailing misdeed of course gives the principal perpetrators the green light to sell our future to satan himself, so long as the perpetrators can take so much unearned gains as to loan themselves millions to take the presidency.

But that isn’t the end of the numbers. If you divide the hundred-trillion amongst far less than a hundred-million elders who so narcissistically parade their wealth and success, and who have incurred over their lifetimes almost the whole brunt of this expense which they so gladly defer to their own projeny, you find that their actual wealth is far from what would sustain their cheap million-dollar homes alongside every town’s fairways.

Oh sure, it pisses them off to high satan when grandson calls grandfather on the inconsistency of it; but the truth is, when you divide just this hundred trillion among the less than hundred-million who have incurred its costs, and even gave way to the system which could only engender all these things, you find on average that their net “wealth” is about a negative million “dollars” apiece.

Thank you Hillary, for giving me the opportunity to point that out to Americans who I hope will rise against you. After all, the only reason grandfather would have to insist this artificial debt be imposed upon grandson, is that he doesn’t have the spine to call you on it.

Many of you may remember how Bill Clinton boasted of his balancing the budget in (shoot, I forget the year offhand) a state of the union speech. He commended himself with an expression, “something which was previously thought to be mathematically impossible.” (Something like that.)

I never wrote Mr. Clinton of course that it was mathematically impossible to balance the federal budget. On the contrary, I explained it was mathematically impossible to sustain a vital circulation without perpetually multiplying the sum of debt in proportion to the circulation, so much as the periodic interest on an ever greater sum of debt. Which of course is exactly what happened.

Would Mr. Clinton (or Mrs. Clinton) take the issue up with me personally? Absolutely not; and you know why. No one has ever disproven the proposition that any purported economy subject to exploitation by interest, inherently multiplies debt in proportion to the circulation until the system eventually succumbs to a terminal sum of debt.

How high is the Clinton’s leadership then?

Ten years after, she’s still perpetuating the lie of it, hoping you’ll never know the difference.

Maybe you won’t. No, instead of replying, Clinton lied to the whole country; and for those 8 years of effort, the only form of the Clinton’s response was to send 8 years of Christmas Cards. I think maybe the first three of them, I opened.

Visit http://www.change.gov/page/s/yourvision to pressure the Obama Transition Team to adopt mathematically perfected economy?. I’m aware the president-elect is hiring all the wrong people; but the fact you demanded representation when you could draws the line between the bad guys ??and the rest. Make sure you mention mathematically perfected economy? explicitly (maybe even providing a link to these pages), or your appeal may be lost in the ever escalating number of late comers who pretend to advocate a solution which existed long before them.

RELATED MATERIAL

“To find the players in all the corruption of the world, ‘Follow the money.’ To find the captains of world corruption, follow the money all the way.”

mike montagne ??founder, PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy?, author/engineer of mathematically perfected economy? (1979)

? COPYRIGHT 2008, by mike montagne and PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy?.

Except for profit making ventures or entities otherwise granted explicit permission to publish this copyright material, this article may be distributed or reprinted in whole only, from and including any quotes preceding its title, through and inclusive of the following permalink(s), by email or otherwise. Visitors may also download our entire directory of regular/main site articles from our downloads page: http://perfecteconomy.com/pg-free-pfmpe-downloads.html. If you want to save your country, we encourage personal distribution of this material to all conducive recipients of your personal address books. Of course, you may also send only the following permalink:

http://perfecteconomy.com/wp/2008/12/13/hillarys-campaign-lie-regarding-cleaning-up-the-mess/

DISCUSS THIS ARTICLE IN THE PFMPE? FORUM:

http://www.perfecteconomy.com/f/viewforum.php?f=22

[END PERMALINK(S)]

mike montagne — PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy™.

"To find the players in all the corruption of the world, 'Follow the money.' To find the captains of world corruption, follow the money all the way."

mike montagne — PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy™

While 12,000 homes a day continue to go into foreclosure, mathematically perfected economy™ would re-finance a $100,000 home with a hundred-year lifespan at the overall rate of $1,000 per year or $83.33 per month. Without costing us anything, we would immediately become as much as 12 times as liquid on present revenue. Transitioning to MPE™ would apply all payments already made against existent debt toward principal. Many of us would be debt free. There would be no housing crisis, no credit crisis. Unlimited funding would immediately be available to sustain all the industry we are capable of.

There is no other solution. Regulation can only temper an inherently terminal process.

If you are not promoting mathematically perfected economy™, then you condemn us to monetary failure.

© COPYRIGHT 1979-2009 by mike montagne and PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy™. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.COPYRIGHT 1979-2009 by mike montagne and PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy™. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. TRADEMARKS: PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy™, Mathematically Perfected Economy™, Mathematically Perfected Currency™, MPE™, and PFMPE™ are trademarks of mike montagne and PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy™, perfecteconomy.com. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Firefox™.BEST VIEWED WITH MOZILLA FIREFOX™.


Search perfecteconomy.com     Search Web