What should concern us is who stands in the way of solution, and why.
HILLARY’S CAMPAIGN LIE ??REGARDING CLEANING UP THE MESS
Anyone who has followed these pages for the last fifteen or twenty years knows I’ve been advocating mathematically perfected economy? for a long while, that I’ve demonstrated the consequences of the imposed system over that whole while, and that I’ve done my best to hold purported representatives accountable.
During the recent campaign, Senator Hillary Clinton boasted often that it took a Clinton to clean up the mess left by the first Bush, and that it would take a Clinton to clean up the mess left by the second. She boasted also that her husband presided over the false and failed bubble of the Dot Com era, telling us again and again that this was the greatest industrial expansion of modern history.
Where were you, if you actually think so?
The thing Mrs. Clinton refers to by such obtuse terms as a “mess,” is also a lie.
I’m not about to defend George Bush, who is perhaps the worst president in our history. It’s difficult for me to imagine we could suffer worse. Bush of course did compound or escalate the demise of our country by failing to arrest the causes of our monetary failure. But what we need to understand is it is not the President per se which simply multiplies our national, public and private debt. It is the system; and without a President, Congress, and/or Supreme Court which abide by the law, and are friendly to actual solution, so we will only have more of the same.
In any case, many of us believe the Bill Clinton (and now, Hillary Clinton) lie, that Mr. Clinton balanced the federal budget. If in fact he did do so, how did he do so?
There of course was no real increase in public income, for ten years after the fact only a handful of survivors of the supposed Dot Com boom actually had made a penny of profit, while real industry was expatriated from the country. There was no increase in tax rates or revenues, for our industry was so marginalized already, and so posed to take the fall it would suffer under the subsequent Bush Administration, that we could not have afforded increased tax rates, or increased interest rates either. Nor was there a commensurable decrease in federal spending.
How then could there have been a balancing of the federal budget? Well, any *genuine* accountant would tell that there couldn’t have been.
So this “cleaning up” of a “mess” which Hillary Clinton so falsely boasts of is something we’re going to endure under the present administration, which she of course will gladly participate in ??not of course to solve the problems or causes of inevitable failure, but to preserve the very system of exploitation which is responsible for our inevitable collapse.
You remember of course that Bill Clinton raided other federal assets to claim he had balanced the budget, much as states are now selling assets the people paid for merely to pretend accountability under a system of inevitable failure, which all the puppets of the plutocracy work to preserve upon us. What was the consequence of Mr. Clinton’s robbing Peter to pay Paul?
The math differs according to sources, but some estimates are that the consequence to so called social security was so devastating that as much as over a hundred trillion dollars of near term, unfunded federal liabilities exist in the wake of those robberies. Just on the account of the lie of social security then, the Clinton’s mis-doings, which Hillary Clinton now calls “cleaning up a mess,” have imposed a hundred-trillion “dollars” of liability on future generations, which Mrs. and Mr. Clinton merely refrain from calling a debt, to falsely claim they balanced the federal budget.
How does this shake out?
Largely it appeals to the eldest generation, who are the last to maintain any false faith in the guilty parties ??but only of course for their own sakes. This misdoing has kept the co-perpetrators voting for the powers that be from either party of betrayal; and this pathetic prevailing misdeed of course gives the principal perpetrators the green light to sell our future to satan himself, so long as the perpetrators can take so much unearned gains as to loan themselves millions to take the presidency.
But that isn’t the end of the numbers. If you divide the hundred-trillion amongst far less than a hundred-million elders who so narcissistically parade their wealth and success, and who have incurred over their lifetimes almost the whole brunt of this expense which they so gladly defer to their own projeny, you find that their actual wealth is far from what would sustain their cheap million-dollar homes alongside every town’s fairways.
Oh sure, it pisses them off to high satan when grandson calls grandfather on the inconsistency of it; but the truth is, when you divide just this hundred trillion among the less than hundred-million who have incurred its costs, and even gave way to the system which could only engender all these things, you find on average that their net “wealth” is about a negative million “dollars” apiece.
Thank you Hillary, for giving me the opportunity to point that out to Americans who I hope will rise against you. After all, the only reason grandfather would have to insist this artificial debt be imposed upon grandson, is that he doesn’t have the spine to call you on it.
Many of you may remember how Bill Clinton boasted of his balancing the budget in (shoot, I forget the year offhand) a state of the union speech. He commended himself with an expression, “something which was previously thought to be mathematically impossible.” (Something like that.)
I never wrote Mr. Clinton of course that it was mathematically impossible to balance the federal budget. On the contrary, I explained it was mathematically impossible to sustain a vital circulation without perpetually multiplying the sum of debt in proportion to the circulation, so much as the periodic interest on an ever greater sum of debt. Which of course is exactly what happened.
Would Mr. Clinton (or Mrs. Clinton) take the issue up with me personally? Absolutely not; and you know why. No one has ever disproven the proposition that any purported economy subject to exploitation by interest, inherently multiplies debt in proportion to the circulation until the system eventually succumbs to a terminal sum of debt.
How high is the Clinton’s leadership then?
Ten years after, she’s still perpetuating the lie of it, hoping you’ll never know the difference.
Maybe you won’t. No, instead of replying, Clinton lied to the whole country; and for those 8 years of effort, the only form of the Clinton’s response was to send 8 years of Christmas Cards. I think maybe the first three of them, I opened.
Visit http://www.change.gov/page/s/yourvision to pressure the Obama Transition Team to adopt mathematically perfected economy?. I’m aware the president-elect is hiring all the wrong people; but the fact you demanded representation when you could draws the line between the bad guys ??and the rest. Make sure you mention mathematically perfected economy? explicitly (maybe even providing a link to these pages), or your appeal may be lost in the ever escalating number of late comers who pretend to advocate a solution which existed long before them.
- EVERY PRESIDENT SINCE GERALD FORD EVADES MATHEMATICALLY PERFECTED ECONOMY?
- [?KEY?]??THE PROBLEM IS NOT DEBT!
- [?KEY?]??IF I WERE PRESIDENT ??HOW TO ARREST WORLD WIDE MONETARY COLLAPSE IN A DAY
- SYNOPSIS ??MATHEMATICALLY PERFECTED ECONOMY? REDUCED TO ITS BAREST THREAD
- PROBABILITY AND TIMELINE FOR WORLD-WIDE ECONOMIC COLLAPSE AS A CONSEQUENCE OF INTEREST
- EVALUATION OF JEFFERSON’S OPINION ON THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF A NATIONAL BANK
- WHY DON’T THE DEMOCRATS REVERSE WILSON’S ERROR, AND REPEAL THE FEDERAL RESERVE ACT?
“To find the players in all the corruption of the world, ‘Follow the money.’ To find the captains of world corruption, follow the money all the way.”
mike montagne ??founder, PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy?, author/engineer of mathematically perfected economy? (1979)
? COPYRIGHT 2008, by mike montagne and PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy?.
Except for profit making ventures or entities otherwise granted explicit permission to publish this copyright material, this article may be distributed or reprinted in whole only, from and including any quotes preceding its title, through and inclusive of the following permalink(s), by email or otherwise. Visitors may also download our entire directory of regular/main site articles from our downloads page: http://perfecteconomy.com/pg-free-pfmpe-downloads.html. If you want to save your country, we encourage personal distribution of this material to all conducive recipients of your personal address books. Of course, you may also send only the following permalink:
DISCUSS THIS ARTICLE IN THE PFMPE? FORUM: