mathematically perfected economy™ (MPE™) 1 : the singular integral solution of 1) inflation and deflation, 2) systemic manipulation of the cost or value of money or property, and 3) inherent, artificial multiplication of debt into terminal systemic failure; 2 : every prospective debtor's right to issue legitimate promises to pay, free of extrinsic manipulation, adulteration, or exploitation of those promises, or the natural opportunity to make good on them; 3 : our right to certify, to enforce, and to monetize industry and commerce by this one sustaining and truly economic process.
mike montagne's mathematically perfected economy™ BLOG
YOU ARE VIEWING ARTICLES IN THE FOLLOWING CATEGORY (SELECT CATEGORIES FROM THE DIRECTORY, RIGHT):
mike montagne’s mathematically perfected economy blog » 2008 » December
What should concern us is who stands in the way of solution, and why.
mike montagne
HILLARY’S CAMPAIGN DEBTS ??RESPONSE TO MESSAGE FROM JOE BIDEN
This article responds to a message from Joe Biden, in part which reads:
President-elect Obama and I have been assembling our team, [1]?and we plan to hit the ground running next month.
We want to be ready to go, and that’s why I’m asking you to help us honor [2]?an outstanding commitment we made during the election.
[3]?Our campaign pledged to help Senator Hillary Clinton — one of the vital members of our team and our future Secretary of State — retire her campaign debt.[4]?That’s the money her campaign owes to the vendors across the country that make our political process possible.
Dear Joe,
Particularly as I have sent scores of appeals for you to respond to mathematically perfected economy?, I am particularly offended by certain aspects of your appeal that we pay for Senator Clinton’s gamble to take the presidency with borrowed monetary clout, rather than actual support from anyone who might have presumed Mrs. Clinton offered actual solution to the issues facing our country, and particularly to solution of the present, artificial prospect of world wide monetary failure.
Curiously, though John Podesta’s recent letter claims that all the posts to change.gov are read and archived, I don’t find any of my posts advocating mathematically perfected economy? archived there at all. Why wouldn’t people be able to read careful explanations that there is one and one only solution to 1) inflation and deflation, 2) systemic manipulation of the cost or value of money or property, and 3) inherent, irreversible, and inevitably terminal multiplication of debt in proportion to the vital, obligated circulation, Mr. Biden? Most conscientious citizens would think that if no one ??and particularly this new administration ??can demonstrate even how it is possible to maintain a vital circulation without multiplying debt into an eventually terminal sum of debt (to which idea of course, all data concurs), that the prospect of mathematically perfected economy? is the only direction a responsible republic would head, particularly unless the actual opportunity of the people to govern themselves were usurped. Why would you not participate in diligent discussion of that proposition, Mr. Biden?
We both know the answer, which of course raises my first objection to your recent message. Because I tried even so strenuously to contact your campaign and Mr. Obama’s campaign regarding the proposition of mathematically perfected economy?, I find it remarkable that during the whole campaign both candidates refused to address the fundamental/categoric faults of the imposed monetary system. When you say, “we plan to hit the ground running next month [1],” what you actually mean is that with the very perpetrators of this criminal system welcomed into your administration, and while purposely avoiding any discussion of the one, ready plan which can not only save “our” “economy,” but do so without cost, you hope to preserve the imposed system of exploitation, even as it can only multiply debt beyond the terminal sums of debt which now threaten the world with inevitable monetary failure.
Then you tell us [2, 3], that you made an outstanding commitment to help Senator Hillary Clinton retire her campaign debt. If she had earned the money she gambled on the presidency by the sweat of her brow, and if that gamble were not itself an affront to the principles of representation, I might think, “how nice,” Mr. Biden. But in fact then what this commitment meant, which we only learn about now, is that no matter who we voted for, we would get the same team ??all of the members of which, predictably, refuse to discuss or debate this proposition of mathematically perfected economy?, either. Isn’t that a remarkable coincidence, Mr. Biden, particularly as none of you have ever proven that there is another possible solution to 1) inflation and deflation, 2) systemic manipulation of the cost or value of money or property, and 3) inherent, irreversible, and inevitably terminal multiplication of debt in proportion to the vital, obligated circulation?
As I wrote you and Mr. Obama months ago, Mr. Biden, by the time your ill-conceived, pretended course to reparation *might* mature under even far greater indebtedness than has precipitated the present events, worse conditions will prevail; we will be less able to afford the jobs you propose you can create, and which are only obstructed by the inherent multiplication of indebtedness engendered by the system you intend preserve; and, most obviously, we may lose more jobs by then than you pretend to create, but will actually only allow, despite further multiplication of indebtedness, by imposing further costs upon us.
Not only is your preposterous proposition and team ill conceived to accomplish such absurd purposes then, Mr. Biden, the fact is, what you propose as better will actually be to be worse off than we are now.
So despite the simple math, versus the pretended math of simpletons, what you’re actually asking us for Mr. Biden, is to honor your commitment to ensure we had no candidate to represent us, and that we will have no officer to represent us. Anyone who offers you a cent then, paves the way to the final destruction of our country.
Visit http://www.change.gov/page/s/yourvision to pressure the Obama Transition Team to adopt mathematically perfected economy?. I’m aware the president-elect is hiring all the wrong people; but the fact you demanded representation when you could draws the line between the bad guys ??and the rest.
“To find the players in all the corruption of the world, ‘Follow the money.’ To find the captains of world corruption, follow the money all the way.”
mike montagne ??founder, PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy?, author/engineer of mathematically perfected economy? (1979)
? COPYRIGHT 2008, by mike montagne and PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy?.
Except for profit making ventures or entities otherwise granted explicit permission to publish this copyright material, this article may be distributed or reprinted in whole only, from and including any quotes preceding its title, through and inclusive of the following permalink(s), by email or otherwise. Visitors may also download our entire directory of regular/main site articles from our downloads page: http://perfecteconomy.com/pg-free-pfmpe-downloads.html. If you want to save your country, we encourage personal distribution of this material to all conducive recipients of your personal address books. Of course, you may also send only the following permalink:
I appreciate the digging for the truth, but this is still a step short.
The “markets” (subjects) are not “correcting” some anomalous behavior to its proper result. In fact, that ostensible result is neither defined nor then agreed upon; and certainly, it isn’t even possible under the imposed system to rectify commerce to the usual concept of the subjects ??that they should be able to trade their production for whatever they deem to be equal measures of the production of others.
The stupefied concept of “correction” therefore cannot even be said to return to such a goal, because as a system which inherently and irreversibly multiplies debt into terminal debt remains subject to ever greater proportional indebtedness, any eventual state of what you wrongly call a “correction” leaves ever greater unearned taking *from* the pool of wealth to the mere publishers of *our* promises to pay each other.
Likewise, neither then are we restrained from “correction” by some ostensible regulation, for on the contrary, what restrains us from a bona fide correction to the desirable state where we can trade our production for the equivalent production of others is the very system itself, which in the very form of the obfuscated currency, compels us to service ever greater debt, all to the ever greater and ultimately terminal unearned taking of the mere issuers of our promises to pay each other.
All you have here then is the inevitable result of allowing a pretended creditor to usurp the role of the real creditor, imposing upon real creditor and debtor, a form of currency which can only multiply debt in proportion to the circulation, until we succumb to a terminal sum of debt. You remark loosely about the consequences, and lament the failure to correct, when the real cause is so simple and rectifiable, if it weren’t for those who intend to preserve the iniquities of the system so that they can take from it.
The real problem isn’t that we can’t identify this cause or solve it, because I did so thirty years ago. I also provided the first term of the Reagan Administration with computer models which projected that implemented rates of interest and growth would multiply debt in proportion to the circulation until we suffered a terminal sum of debt at approximately 2010 AD.
That was 25 years ago; and those models (which you can still download from our pages and run the same numbers to render the same projections) have accurately projected the accumulation of debt since, merely by replicating the very process the unassenting subjects of the system are required to meet, merely to maintain a vital circulation. That is, to maintain a vital circulation, the models simply borrow back principal and interest paid out of the general circulation, as subsequent sums of debt which of course perpetually increase by ever greater increments of periodic interest on an ever greater sum of debt, until the costs of servicing an eventual, terminal sum of debt exceed the entire circulation. The reason this sum of debt is terminal of course, is that the previous sum of debt already requires all it is possible to pay, and the resultant, terminal sum of debt requires even more ??a cost of servicing debt which is impossible to meet.
Perhaps this sounds familiar. Perhaps in your unique obfuscations of “corrections” and the like, which obviously are not natural phenomena, but imposed, man made consequences of all the unearned taking… perhaps instead you fall among those who intend somehow to perpetuate this purportedly noble crime. If there weren’t so many of the latter obviously, we would have resolved these simple issues thirty years ago, that none of us would have cause to make these remarks.
The real end of an era then is only so certain as the rest of us are ready to account for the obvious. We have but few issues here, and specifically/categorically, those issues are 1) inflation and deflation, 2) systemic manipulation of the cost or value of money or property, and 3) inherent, irreversible multiplication of debt in proportion to a circulation.
As to the latter issue, which of course is the principal cause the present terminal conditions (and irreversible furtherance of those conditions to the worse), what we have to realize is that the producer is the real creditor, because they are forced to take a promise to pay (note) from the debtor. Ordinarily, in a system where the promise can be guaranteed (as in mathematically perfected economy?), the debtor issues their promise, because after all, it *is* *their* promise.
What we have effectively is a third party which intervenes upon this natural relationship, obstructing the debtor from issuing their promise to pay on their paper. This extrinsic party, which produces nothing and yet will eventually and quite injuriously acquire title to all property merely for the resultant obfuscation, merely publishes the promise of the debtor at virtually no cost to the extrinsic party, claiming all the while that the costless promise is equivalent then as it might later be, if we give scope to it, to the wealth we attempt to trade as that form of currency multiplies indebtedness until we succumb to a terminal sum of debt.
The present exercise then is hardly intellectual, because it carefully avoids recognizing these simple facts and their inevitable ramifications.
From the very beginning, the problem was the facades, corruption,, and escalating injustice of the very system which was imposed upon us despite political promises to the contrary. Now we attempt to perpetuate those arguments in favor of preserving the system, hoping for “corrections,” or justice against a stronger tide, sweeping justice away at an inherently escalating rate?
There’s no chance of succeeding there; but of course you can try for “your share” of unearned taking if you promote any of the obvious forms of exploitation without of course declaring that goal. But you’ll still be a wee fish in a tank with an alpha predator which can only grow.
For the rest of us however, the only possible solution is mathematically perfected economy?, because it’s the singular possible solution to 1) inflation and deflation, 2) systemic manipulation of the cost or value of money or property, and 3) inherent, irreversible multiplication of debt in proportion to a circulation ??and because we can transform the present system to mathematically perfected economy? immediately, and without cost.
The only thing which actually stands in the way then, is all the material such as this, which focuses us elsewhere.
Visit http://www.change.gov/page/s/yourvision to pressure the Obama Transition Team to adopt mathematically perfected economy?. I’m aware the president-elect is hiring all the wrong people; but the fact you demanded representation when you could draws the line between the bad guys ??and the rest.
“To find the players in all the corruption of the world, ‘Follow the money.’ To find the captains of world corruption, follow the money all the way.”
mike montagne ??founder, PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy?, author/engineer of mathematically perfected economy? (1979)
? COPYRIGHT 2008, by mike montagne and PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy?.
Except for profit making ventures or entities otherwise granted explicit permission to publish this copyright material, this article may be distributed or reprinted in whole only, from and including any quotes preceding its title, through and inclusive of the following permalink(s), by email or otherwise. Visitors may also download our entire directory of regular/main site articles from our downloads page: http://perfecteconomy.com/pg-free-pfmpe-downloads.html. If you want to save your country, we encourage personal distribution of this material to all conducive recipients of your personal address books. Of course, you may also send only the following permalink:
What should concern us is who stands in the way of solution, and why.
mike montagne
JOHN PODESTA PRETENDS OBAMA-BIDEN TRANSITION TEAM TRANSPARENCY
John Podesta writes:
Dear mike,
Everyday, we meet with organizations that present ideas for the Transition and the incoming Obama-Biden Administration. In past transitions, meetings like this have been held behind closed doors.
Not anymore. Today, every Obama-Biden Transition staff member received a memo outlining the “Seat at the Table” Transparency Policy. I’ve included a copy of it below.
The policy is pretty simple: the people and groups we’re meeting with, the subjects of the meetings, and any documents shared in the meetings will now be made available on Change.gov. Most importantly, the American public can weigh in with comments or their own materials.
Read the memo and watch our “Seat at the Table” video:
This is our latest step toward a more transparent and accessible Transition. We look forward to benefitting from the many more voices that will now be a part of the decision-making process.
Thank you,
John
The transition team’s “Seat at the Table Video” is hosted below:
I’ve sent scores of appeals to Obama-Biden, arguing/establishing not only a)?how mathematically perfected economy? is the one and only solution to a system which can only engender inflation and deflation, undesirable, systemic manipulation of the cost or value of money or property, and inherent, irreversible, and terminal multiplication of debt by interest; b)?but further demonstrating how mathematically perfected economy? solves all the issues immediately, and virtually without cost. The video claims all posts by citizens are visible, and that the transition team reads/studies all submissions. But if you search for “Montagne,” “perfected economy,” and so forth, you won’t turn up a single submission from PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy?.
There is no integrity to this purported transparency whatever; and I’ll tell you why: Because the Obama-Biden Administration has already hired a new set of foxes to guard the chicken coop; and because they already know they are wrong.
There is nothing outrageous or disruptive about actual solution. Second-graders should be able to understand that if you define inflation and deflation respectively as increases or decreases in circulation per whatever wealth the circulation is intended to represent, that you can only solve inflation and deflation by maintaining a circulation which at all times is equal to the remaining value of the wealth the circulation is intended to represent. Second-graders should be able to understand that you can only do that if we pay the principal only off, at the rate of depreciation or consumption of the wealth ??and that it is impossible to do so if the promise to pay of the debtor is subject to interest, not even charged by the actual creditor, who produces or turns over the related property. Second-graders should be able to understand that if such a circulation is subject to interest, that merely to continue servicing monetary obligations (principal plus interest) which exceed the circulation (principal), it is necessary to perpetually re-borrow principal and interest paid out of the general circulation as ever greater sums of debt, perpetually increased so much as periodic interest. Second-graders should be able to understand that this ever-escalating accumulation of debt in proportion to the obligated circulation eventually and inevitably engenders a terminal sum of debt. Second-graders should be able to understand therefore, that they only possible solution is mathematically perfected economy?.
Many months ago I outlined how even optimistic rates of maturation of Obama’s far-fetched plan to revitalized a dying system had little hope even to offset the further consequences we would suffer by the time his far-fetched plan could be tested. He has not even taken office yet, and second-graders should be able to understand he will fail:
One of the most preposterous pages of this purportedly open, transparent process, is titled “President-elect Barack Obama lays out key parts of Economic Recovery Plan” (Saturday, December 6, 2008 06:00 AM EST). Of course, these are the things that a genuine campaign of capable authorities would have declared to the electorate. Now, we are dictated an eleventh hour solution, which has no proof, and is easily itself invalidated by the simple tests of the most casual critical thinking.
Note that the preceding video only hopes to create 2.5 million jobs by 2011. Not only does it fail to offer a plausible explanation how we are to afford consuming the production of those jobs, or sustaining those jobs under a system which can only multiply debt into even more critical or terminal conditions by 2011, but the page I have just cited states, “Yesterday we learned that our economy has lost 2 million jobs since the recession began 11 months ago.”
So the president-elect is even 39 days still from inauguration, and we can see my prediction has practically come true: We have almost lost *already* the jobs he *hopes* only to create, and which we will not be able to afford sustaining under even greater debt. Indeed, look around you, and everything you see as a proposition, except mathematically perfected economy?, involves taking on greater cost and greater debt.
So not only do we have mere pretended transparency; we have a developing scandal of the greatest proportions, because the Obama-Biden team has ignored every appeal to implement mathematically perfected economy?, because the Obama-Biden team has in fact hired all the lowliest advocates of the system of exploitation which can only engender the world wide failure we shall soon experience, and because the only purpose of those advocates is to preserve that system of exploitation.
We are denied the immediate and cost free solution of mathematically perfected economy? therefore not because all the king’s horses and all the king’s men could not understand that mathematically perfected economy? is the singular solution which can save us, but because they so well know that they have no argument capable of invalidating the proposition of mathematically perfected economy? that they dare not even include scores of appeals in their pretended archives.
Visit http://www.change.gov/page/s/yourvision to pressure the Obama Transition Team to adopt mathematically perfected economy?. I’m aware the president-elect is hiring all the wrong people; but the fact you demanded representation when you could draws the line between the bad guys ??and the rest.
“To find the players in all the corruption of the world, ‘Follow the money.’ To find the captains of world corruption, follow the money all the way.”
mike montagne ??founder, PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy?, author/engineer of mathematically perfected economy? (1979)
? COPYRIGHT 2008, by mike montagne and PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy?.
Except for profit making ventures or entities otherwise granted explicit permission to publish this copyright material, this article may be distributed or reprinted in whole only, from and including any quotes preceding its title, through and inclusive of the following permalink(s), by email or otherwise. Visitors may also download our entire directory of regular/main site articles from our downloads page: http://perfecteconomy.com/pg-free-pfmpe-downloads.html. If you want to save your country, we encourage personal distribution of this material to all conducive recipients of your personal address books. Of course, you may also send only the following permalink:
What should concern us is who stands in the way of solution, and why.
mike montagne
JOINT CENTER FOR POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC STUDIES REJECTS MATHEMATICALLY PERFECTED ECONOMY??
Wednesday, Margaret Brown of the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies returned my call, which requested to know whether the JCPES would be interested in mathematically perfected economy?. Upon my brief explanation that MPE? involved mathematic proofs a)?that any purported economy subject to interest ultimately terminates itself under insoluble debt; and b)?that there is one and one only integral solution for 1)?inflation and deflation, 2)?systemic manipulation of the cost or value of money or property, and 3)?inherent, irreversible, and inevitably terminal multiplication of debt in proportion to the vital, obligated circulation, Margaret Brown simply answered, “That doesn’t sound like anything that would be on our agenda.”
Visit http://www.change.gov/page/s/yourvision to pressure the Obama Transition Team to adopt mathematically perfected economy?. I’m aware the president-elect is hiring all the wrong people; but the fact you demanded representation when you could draws the line between the bad guys ??and the rest.
“To find the players in all the corruption of the world, ‘Follow the money.’ To find the captains of world corruption, follow the money all the way.”
mike montagne ??founder, PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy?, author/engineer of mathematically perfected economy? (1979)
? COPYRIGHT 2008, by mike montagne and PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy?.
Except for profit making ventures or entities otherwise granted explicit permission to publish this copyright material, this article may be distributed or reprinted in whole only, from and including any quotes preceding its title, through and inclusive of the following permalink(s), by email or otherwise. Visitors may also download our entire directory of regular/main site articles from our downloads page: http://perfecteconomy.com/pg-free-pfmpe-downloads.html. If you want to save your country, we encourage personal distribution of this material to all conducive recipients of your personal address books. Of course, you may also send only the following permalink:
What should concern us is who stands in the way of solution, and why.
mike montagne
CURSORY RESPONSE TO ZEITGEIST ADDENDUM
I was asked the other day to respond to the so called Zeitgeist Addendum.
The Zeitgeist drama of course is no more than an eleventh-hour, pretended entry into the monetary reform arena. It will never be rightly exalted for advancing the idea of a singular solution for inflation and deflation, systemic manipulation and dispossession of industry, or inherent multiplication of debt into terminal debt. What does Zeitgeist even intend to accomplish? Zeitgeist does not even recognize the idea a privatized currency can and should be issued by the people, who are the real creditors wherever tokens intended to represent the value of their production are to convey their commerce.
Like anything else, the actual value of the Zeitgeist plea can be no greater than the degree to which it stresses effect and style over conclusive argument and solution. We cannot even rightly pretend to understand it points the way to solution, because Zeitgeist only affirms a few observations which were raised long ago, and because it concludes no further, conclusive understanding whatever from those observations. The initial version of Zeitgeist doesn’t even address the nature of money moreso than to dig up the very superficial definitions which for so long have failed to serve us. But thus, building upon those flawed definitions as if flawed definitions are a fitting foundation for anything further, what can and does Zeitgeist introduce to the development of solution?
Both the so called Addendum and its previous version merely repeat research from decades earlier, which I myself presented on the contrary as a basis for developing the critical arguments of solution, and which of course require defining/ascertaining not only what “money” can and must represent, but exactly how any obfuscations of that necessary definition result in the present crisis.
In 1979, that work developed the thesis that any pretended monetary system based on interest-bearing debt ultimately terminates itself under insoluble debt; and this thirty-year-old thesis itself and alone explains anything which Zeitgeist can complain about. Yet does Zeitgeist tie its complaints to this critical fault of the pretended monetary system? Absolutely not; and even if it did, it would only pretend further to be the author of the justification of that complaint.
But it is impossible then for Zeitgeist to certify any purported solution, because it doesn’t even identify the cause of the problem it must solve.
Neither then does Zeitgeist build a decisive analysis of the same history. Likewise, it neither disproves mathematically perfected economy? or recognizes whether there is one and one only solution to inflation and deflation, systemic manipulation of the cost or value of money or property, and inherent, irreversible, and terminal multiplication of debt by interest. It neither identifies the role of real creditor, or the usurpation of that role to impose usury. Thus for all its mere drama, it only affirms that the consequences of that usurpation are offenses against us, but only to turn us somewhere other than solution, and only as the thesis of mathematically perfected economy? far more clearly demonstrated thirty years ago. Why then does Zeitgeist jump into the way of solution?
Thus Zeitgeist merely splinters a critical movement from what it has to understand and where it has to go. It neither proves alternate solutions for inflation and deflation, systemic manipulation of the cost or value of money or property, or inherent multiplication of debt by interest; nor does it raise any fact of complaint which cannot be attributed to these injustices, and the need for actual solution.
I was asked nonetheless in particular to reply to the proposed, “resource-based” industrial system. I’m still wondering why. There isn’t even a proposed method of transitioning to such a thing. There can’t be, because there isn’t even a substantial definition of it. The Zeitgeist drama comprises so many obvious faults and deficiencies that it no more warrants reply than viewing. The real question in my opinion is why watch this in lieu of studying solution?
Only because I was asked, did I watch the drama to its end, and so, do I give sufficient examples of its critical faults:
Since when for instance, is the monetary system “labor based”? It is based instead not only on debts subject to interest which can only multiply the sum of debt, but on intervention to pretend the role of creditor, that artificial multiplication of artificial debt is made the very instrument which multiplies exploitation into terminal exploitation.
But even if the monetary system were “labor based,” what is the fault of reward for labor? Worse, what is the alternative? Reward without labor/effort? That proposed alternative is the very subversion which is responsible for what you have now.
Anyone who dreams we will ever ??or even should ever ??seek to simply eliminate repetitive tasks ??a thing which is impractical ??is merely glossing over the real issues with pretended intellectualism. If you have ever developed a product which is the pinnacle of its class, you have repeated *every* step in fact often enough to perfect them above all others. If you have built machines to do the work better than ever before, you know you will do far more untoward work on machineS than can ever be justified, if you don’t first toil over every aspect of the process so that the first machine you will build will be as close to the ultimate as possible.
Repetition is not a fault of the monetary system, nor is repetition or other pathetic complaints of Zeitgeist responsible for the present crisis. Nor are these things what obstructs us from building the proposed trains of the future ??a thing many of us have envisioned and discussed for many years. The problem is the imposed monetary system, because only if you solve its intended faults do you free yourself to build whatever you determine. Why can’t we do that now? Because the usurer, who merely usurps the role of creditor, determines where the money goes, and what “industry” (or obstruction of *other* industry) is to prevail.
Once they own that dominant process, all they have to do and all they want to do is sit on it, because it is accomplishing what men who do nothing want to accomplish.
The answer therefore is not to follow them, supposing we all can do nothing, or dedicating ever more effort to doing the least; supposing that repetitive tasks can simply be eliminated or must be eliminated ??or even that this is a new idea. It is no new idea, and it is not even germane to monetary solution, that we can build the most sophisticated wood-working machines which have ever been built ??producing perfect surfaces and steering down crooked bamboo strips, producing compound tapered bevels to tolerances of three ten-thousandths of an inch. We do this when and how we have to, if we can, and only if the monetary system does not obstruct us from doing so. If and whenever we do so however, mechanization follows in the wake of sufficient repetition and deliberation, so that in the building of one eventual machine to do the job right, we minimize work there as well.
So there is a rule which all industrial entrepreneurs either follow or fail to follow which dictates when to build that machine: You build it when you can see you have a repetitive process; and when you have the necessary vision for the machine which establishes how much labor you will save over the need to do the intended work.
That’s the balance of usual facts, not new facts, which give the machine the nod. There is no failure to realize this which prevents us from building the machine; the problems which prevent you from building the machine are necessary finances, and/or a monetary system which would deprive the prospective market of the ability to afford the product of the machine, even if you build it.
So then, if you really want to free labor from unnecessary repetitive tasks, and if you really want to free the whole of us of unnecessary labor in producing what we want or need, you eradicate whatever subversions of commercial trade and industrial development preclude this natural objective.
Until Zeitgeist or anyone else proves otherwise, the one effective manifestation of that necessary eradication is mathematically perfected economy?.
“To find the players in all the corruption of the world, ‘Follow the money.’ To find the captains of world corruption, follow the money all the way.”
mike montagne ??founder, PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy?, author/engineer of mathematically perfected economy? (1979)
? COPYRIGHT 2008, by mike montagne and PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy?.
Except for profit making ventures or entities otherwise granted explicit permission to publish this copyright material, this article may be distributed or reprinted in whole only, from and including any quotes preceding its title, through and inclusive of the following permalink(s), by email or otherwise. Visitors may also download our entire directory of regular/main site articles from our downloads page: http://perfecteconomy.com/pg-free-pfmpe-downloads.html. If you want to save your country, we encourage personal distribution of this material to all conducive recipients of your personal address books. Of course, you may also send only the following permalink:
While 12,000 homes a day continue to go into foreclosure, mathematically perfected economy™ would re-finance a $100,000 home with a hundred-year lifespan at the overall rate of $1,000 per year or $83.33 per month. Without costing us anything, we would immediately become as much as 12 times as liquid on present revenue. Transitioning to MPE™ would apply all payments already made against existent debt toward principal. Many of us would be debt free. There would be no housing crisis, no credit crisis. Unlimited funding would immediately be available to sustain all the industry we are capable of.
There is no other solution. Regulation can only temper an inherently terminal process.
If you are not promoting mathematically perfected economy™, then you condemn us to monetary failure.
COPYRIGHT 1979-2009 by mike montagne and PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy™. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. TRADEMARKS: PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy™, Mathematically Perfected Economy™, Mathematically Perfected Currency™, MPE™, and PFMPE™ are trademarks of mike montagne and PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy™, perfecteconomy.com. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
RELATED MATERIAL
SUBSCRIBE to RSS FEED.
COPYRIGHT 1979-2009 by mike montagne and PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy™. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. TRADEMARKS: PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy™, Mathematically Perfected Economy™, Mathematically Perfected Currency™, MPE™, and PFMPE™ are trademarks of mike montagne and PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy™, perfecteconomy.com. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
BEST VIEWED WITH MOZILLA FIREFOX™.