What should concern us is who stands in the way of solution, and why.
September 29, 2008 proposition to immediately arrest monetary failure without cost by transitioning to mathematically perfected economy?, requested by Obama Campaign regulars as sent, and simply returned by the so called Obama Economic Policy Team.
REGARDING OBAMA’S REFUSAL TO SECOND GUESS THE FED
The most disturbing thing about a President who says he “won’t second guess the Fed” is, if you understand the nature of their obfuscation of money, you’re way above second guessing them: you know all they can do is a) make incoming publications of our own promises to pay (”money”) more or less expensive (raise/lower interest), and/or b) loosen or tighten restrictions, “hoping” that can increase the volume sufficiently in that way, while the inherent multiplication of debt “may” “or may not” have increased the sum of debt already to a terminal sum of debt, itself disqualifying us from borrowing further as remains necessary to maintain a vital circulation of what we’re perpetually compelled to pay out of it to service the existing, escalating sum of debt.
There’s no “second guessing” involved in where that’s going; you know it’s all wrong and you know it’s all heading *only* the wrong way if you know the first thing about their obfuscation of “money.”
The next most disturbing thing is that once the sum of debt reaches terminal stature from the artificial obligation to maintain a vital circulation by perpetually re-borrowing so much as all the principal and interest we pay out of the general circulation in servicing a sum of debt which thus increases by ever greater periodic sums of interest on an ever greater sum of debt… they can only maintain a vital circulation by accumulating debt we cannot service. That means federal overspending… issuing themselves free money to buy our production from us without producing… all that sort of thing (artificial sustention).
The latter can only work so far as it sustains every sector of “the economy” (purposed system of exploitation), with the tumbling of certain sectors having the mass and inertia to bring down anything and everything dependent upon it.
So are housing, the auto industry, airlines, transportation infrastructures, industry, and even our expatriated industry failing elsewhere… are all those things sufficient mass?
If they weren’t, then they wouldn’t be tumbling.
And tumbling far they do not have to go.
So what does a President mean when he “won’t second guess the Fed?”
He means his singular approach is to let rats attempt every trick, deception and futility to sustain their imposed system of exploitation, so they can continue to exploit us to the maximal degree possible.
If he meant something else, he’d be speaking to us about mathematically perfected economy?. If he waits much longer, and has half a good monetary bone in his body, he’ll only have eleventh hour pretenders who by the dozens now are lining up on the side of “interest-free monetary” systems, proposing “their own” solutions, which of course can only compromise a singular solution for 1) inflation and deflation, 2) systemic manipulation of the cost or value of money or property, and 3) inherent, irreversible multiplication of debt in proportion to a vital circulation, engendering inevitable systemic failure at a finite system lifespan defined by an inevitable, terminal sum of insoluble debt.
- [?KEY?]??THE PROBLEM IS NOT DEBT!
- [?KEY?]??IF I WERE PRESIDENT ??HOW TO ARREST WORLD WIDE MONETARY COLLAPSE IN A DAY
- SYNOPSIS ??MATHEMATICALLY PERFECTED ECONOMY? REDUCED TO ITS BAREST THREAD
- PROBABILITY AND TIMELINE FOR WORLD-WIDE ECONOMIC COLLAPSE AS A CONSEQUENCE OF INTEREST
- EVALUATION OF JEFFERSON’S OPINION ON THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF A NATIONAL BANK
- WHY DON’T THE DEMOCRATS REVERSE WILSON’S ERROR, AND REPEAL THE FEDERAL RESERVE ACT?
“To find the players in all the corruption of the world, ‘Follow the money.’ To find the captains of world corruption, follow the money all the way.”
mike montagne ??founder, PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy?, author/engineer of mathematically perfected economy? (1979)
? COPYRIGHT 2008, by mike montagne and PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy?.
Except for profit making ventures or entities otherwise granted explicit permission to publish this copyright material, this article may be distributed or reprinted in whole only, from and including any quotes preceding its title, through and inclusive of the following permalink(s), by email or otherwise. Visitors may also download our entire directory of regular/main site articles from our downloads page: http://perfecteconomy.com/pg-free-pfmpe-downloads.html. If you want to save your country, we encourage personal distribution of this material to all conducive recipients of your personal address books. Of course, you may also send only the following permalink:
DISCUSS THIS ARTICLE IN THE PFMPE? FORUM: