mathematically perfected economy™ (MPE™) 1 : the singular integral solution of 1) inflation and deflation, 2) systemic manipulation of the cost or value of money or property, and 3) inherent, artificial multiplication of debt into terminal systemic failure; 2 : every prospective debtor's right to issue legitimate promises to pay, free of extrinsic manipulation, adulteration, or exploitation of those promises, or the natural opportunity to make good on them; 3 : our right to certify, to enforce, and to monetize industry and commerce by this one sustaining and truly economic process.
mike montagne's mathematically perfected economy™ BLOG
YOU ARE VIEWING ARTICLES IN THE FOLLOWING CATEGORY (SELECT CATEGORIES FROM THE DIRECTORY, RIGHT):
mike montagne’s mathematically perfected economy blog » NATIONAL - PERFECTED INTEREST FREE MONETARY SYSTEM
“Frighteningly accurate trends forecaster Gerald Celente says that America will see riots similar to those currently ongoing in Greece and that the cause will be a hyper-inflationary depression, leading to the inevitable use of troops and mercenaries to deal with the crisis as Americans are incarcerated in internment camps.”
When even the formerly wealthy can go hungry in a few days… and obviously, as that hunger can radically revise their immediate temperament… the “possibility” of riots which Mr. Celente pretends to project is only an obvious probability which certainly doesn’t lend itself to a rightful claim of visionary power.
Crime or unrest, however much the people may be deprived of alternatives, will of course rise dramatically as the nonchalant further neglect the causes of the terminal phases of the system of exploitation. It is not even reasonable now to say that we are forecasting such things, because of course we’ve already seen years of escalating credit fraud, banking fraud, derivatives fraud, bubble fraud, and particularly, governmental fraud, as the deprived are pushed over the edge and as the system of exploitation seeks to preserve itself against its irreversible disposition to produce its own demise of terminal indebtedness.
People are not doing these things merely as a matter of creative impulse. The fact this unassented system’s multiplication of indebtedness undoes all that we can do, together with the further fact irreversible, artificial multiplication of indebtedness dispossesses us of whatever wealth we try to produce, leaves us ever more disposed to fight the unjust system however we might deem we can. This very unjust deprivation therefore pushes more and more of us toward finding ways to survive what are not normal circumstances, but wholly artificial ones, imposed not by prolific availability of currency, but on the contrary, by expiration of the circulation, while we remain obligated to continue servicing the greatest, perpetually, dynamically multiplying proportions of artificial indebtedness in history.
We cannot beat the system. It can only beat us. Thus, with riots and further obviously probable consequences aside… we can readily eliminate the causes of further unrest ahead, if we adopt solution. Furthermore, we can only adopt solution if we understand the actual causes we are to solve ??as opposed to the flawed citation of cause from which Mr. Celente could never have actually projected failure. We are already in his projected failure; and his cause of failure doesn’t even exist.
Mr. Celente’s “projection” asserts the very opposite of present facts. He tells us that we are suffering inflation. Traditionally, and technically therefore, this means circulatory inflation ??that is, increases in the circulation per the wealth it should be intended only to represent. While Alex Jones promotes the idea that price inflation (increasing prices) are attributable to this non-existent circulatory inflation, in fact the only systemic cause of price inflation is inherent multiplication of indebtedness into terminal indebtedness, as we are forced to try to maintain a vital circulation by re-borrowing principal and interest paid out of the general circulation as ever greater sums of debt. It is the inherently and irreversibly increasing sum of indebtedness therefore which is the systemic cause of perpetually increases prices.
We cannot understand this simple process by simply decrying that ever greater sums of money are being introduced to the circulation, because of course ever greater sums of currency are exiting the system in servicing the ever escalating sum of debt; and therefore because, it is the predominant disparity toward deflation which is responsible for greater depletion of the circulation, and it is the monumental sum of artificial indebtedness which prevents us from remaining so credit-worthy as to borrow further, as necessary to replenish the circulation. The result is deflation ??ever less “money” than before, and ever less capacity to sustain industry, and to survive, than before.
This obvious, contrary fact of circulatory deflation of course is expressed in the purposely ambiguous form of reports that “credit is drying up.”
In other words, the adulterated nature of the currency has so compromised credit-worthiness by multiplication of debt toward the ultimate terminal sum of debt, that credit cannot be issued, simply because the subject populace is already over-stressed to its limits servicing the existent sums of debt. There isn’t an actual “shortage” of credit (currency) however, because “credit” in fact is illimitable when you have a license to print money “out of thin air.”
The problem of course is not this inexpensiveness of creating the currency, for inexpensive tokens of value are an advantage in a system can preserve the value of money, such as mathematically perfected economy? and mathematically perfected economy? alone. On the contrary, the problem is the adulteration of money’s nature as a token of value ??the problem is that “privatization” of the currency purposely usurps real producer’s role as creditors, to issue the promises of the debtor at cost to the debtor, and no cost to the usurer. It is this purposed obfuscation of “interest” which attaches, for the purpose of exploitation, the very process which serves exploitation alone, by perpetually multiplying debt. There is no actual lending of “money,” for all the promises of the debtors (notes) are simply issued at virtually no cost. No real, earned wealth whatever is at risk, because “the money” is merely published at virtually no cost whatever.
So there is no actual justification of “interest”; there is simply the pretension that earned wealth is at stake; and the opportunity to do all this is imposed by usurping the role of creditor to issue the promises of the debtor.
In the end of the finite lifespan of every such system, as further “credit” increases the sum of debt beyond the limits of credit-worthiness, there is simply no remaining basis for the further credit which is necessary to replenish the circulation of the principal and interest we are paying out of circulation.
Thus the circulation *deflates* as we service the *terminal* sum of debt and cannot borrow further, which *terminal* sum of debt, because it exceeds the limits of credit-worthiness, precludes the assumption of further credit ??which is vital to replenishing the circulation.
So no, Mr. Watson, Mr. Jones, and Mr. Celente; the failure has not been caused by circulatory inflation.
On the contrary in fact, there is no theoretical or factual basis to Mr. Celente?s assertion of hyperinflation. Hyperinflation can only transpire when/if the money changers recognize the system is unrecoverable; and it can only transpire even then by breaking the rules of the imposed system itself, for the system has made us unworthy of servicing further debt.
Only by breaking the rules further may they pour money on the fire. But of course, even so, there?s no power in that to rectify the fatal sum of debt already assumed by the subjects of the system. However feeding the fire comes down (if it comes down), its success will be limited by whatever sectors of the system cannot be saved from immediate overstressing. Those sectors will fail; and they will bring adjacent, dependent sectors down with them.
So of course, the present failure of housing, “securities,” etc. ??all of which are only facades of prosperity ??already comprises blows sufficient to manifest in the death knell of the system of exploitation.
Visit http://www.change.gov/page/s/yourvision to pressure the Obama Transition Team to adopt mathematically perfected economy?. I’m aware the president-elect is hiring all the wrong people; but the fact you demanded representation when you could draws the line between the bad guys ??and the rest. Make sure you mention mathematically perfected economy? explicitly (maybe even providing a link to these pages), or your appeal may be lost in the ever escalating number of late comers who pretend to advocate a solution which existed long before them.
“To find the players in all the corruption of the world, ‘Follow the money.’ To find the captains of world corruption, follow the money all the way.”
mike montagne ??founder, PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy?, author/engineer of mathematically perfected economy? (1979)
? COPYRIGHT 2008, by mike montagne and PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy?.
Except for profit making ventures or entities otherwise granted explicit permission to publish this copyright material, this article may be distributed or reprinted in whole only, from and including any quotes preceding its title, through and inclusive of the following permalink(s), by email or otherwise. Visitors may also download our entire directory of regular/main site articles from our downloads page: http://perfecteconomy.com/pg-free-pfmpe-downloads.html. If you want to save your country, we encourage personal distribution of this material to all conducive recipients of your personal address books. Of course, you may also send only the following permalink:
What should concern us is who stands in the way of solution, and why.
mike montagne
THANKS TO LARRY BECRAFT FOR INTERVIEWING PFMPE? ON LIBERTY’S ANVIL RADIO
A warm thanks to Constitutional Lawyer, long time patriot movement leader, and “Liberty’s Anvil” radio talk show host, Larry Becraft, for dedicating this past Wednesday’s show to mathematically perfected economy?. The show was aired live, this past Wednesday at 2:00 PM on subscription based “Micro Effect” radio, which can be accessed from the web at http://www.themicroeffect.com/broadcastschedule2.php. Search for Larry Becraft at Liberty’s Anvil.
“To find the players in all the corruption of the world, ‘Follow the money.’ To find the captains of world corruption, follow the money all the way.”
mike montagne ??founder, PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy?, author/engineer of mathematically perfected economy? (1979)
? COPYRIGHT 2008, by mike montagne and PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy?.
Except for profit making ventures or entities otherwise granted explicit permission to publish this copyright material, this article may be distributed or reprinted in whole only, from and including any quotes preceding its title, through and inclusive of the following permalink(s), by email or otherwise. Visitors may also download our entire directory of regular/main site articles from our downloads page: http://perfecteconomy.com/pg-free-pfmpe-downloads.html. If you want to save your country, we encourage personal distribution of this material to all conducive recipients of your personal address books. Of course, you may also send only the following permalink:
What should concern us is who stands in the way of solution, and why.
mike montagne
RESPONSE TO SOCIALIST APPEALS AT ICH KUCINICH TEAM ARTICLE
This article responds to comments advocating socialism at the Information Clearing House article, “What is to be Done? The End of the Washington Consensus,” co-authored by Dennis Kucinich chief economic adviser, Michael Hudson, together with professor Jeffrey Sommers of Raritan Valley College, NJ.
You know, you have to be suspicious when anyone who identifies neither the subverted form of present capitalism, the cause of its fall, or the solution of the present improprieties, advocates socialism as the solution, without even prescribing just how that would be.
What we have here is a subversion and eradication of free enterprise. That doesn’t disprove real free enterprise, which we in fact are denied; and socialism likewise denies me the freedom to engage in the industry and style of my choice.
While so called socialism may have succeeded in restoring to the people together, property taken by exploitation or plutocracy, neither does socialism have any structure to sustain free enterprise.
If you don’t believe in free enterprise, *for yourself*, that’s your business. But when you believe in denying it *to me*, that’s an offense against me.
As I said, we do not have free enterprise. We have what the founders called broadly, “involuntary servitude,” and particularly, the form of involuntary servitude is imposed by way of a currency which can only multiply debt, as a vehicle for ever escalating exploitation.
The issue therefore is to eradicate the involuntary servitude and other means of exploitation. As my earlier post states, the principal and terminal issue is the unassented and unlawful form of the currency.
So that’s pretty simple. But it’s a far cry from circumstances which could ever be rectified by socialism ??particularly at the cost of true free enterprise.
Now, if you want on the other hand to offer cooperative industry or services such as “insurance,” nothing in mathematically perfected economy prevents you from doing so. Still of course, you’re doing so only as a matter of free choice; and if you succeed, you will succeed by equaling or exceeding what other free enterprise may deliver by whatever organization they choose.
Even socialism requires a monetary system; and if the monetary system is flawed, you suffer the consequences. But you don’t gain anything or provide anything by forcing your system of organization on others. Seek to impose your organization on me, and, like the present unassented monetary systems of the world, you make yourself the enemy of anyone who wants and deserves to do otherwise. If your advocated organization is indeed better, there is no legitimate reason to impose your experiment on the rest of us, who may know better ??and particularly, who may well know better how to solve the real problems before us, versus giving us the mere slogans of other enemies of real freedom.
Visit http://www.change.gov/page/s/yourvision to pressure the Obama Transition Team to adopt mathematically perfected economy?. I’m aware the president-elect is hiring all the wrong people; but the fact you demanded representation when you could draws the line between the bad guys ??and the rest. Make sure you mention mathematically perfected economy? explicitly (maybe even providing a link to these pages), or your appeal may be lost in the ever escalating number of late comers who pretend to advocate a solution which existed long before them.
“To find the players in all the corruption of the world, ‘Follow the money.’ To find the captains of world corruption, follow the money all the way.”
mike montagne ??founder, PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy?, author/engineer of mathematically perfected economy? (1979)
? COPYRIGHT 2008, by mike montagne and PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy?.
Except for profit making ventures or entities otherwise granted explicit permission to publish this copyright material, this article may be distributed or reprinted in whole only, from and including any quotes preceding its title, through and inclusive of the following permalink(s), by email or otherwise. Visitors may also download our entire directory of regular/main site articles from our downloads page: http://perfecteconomy.com/pg-free-pfmpe-downloads.html. If you want to save your country, we encourage personal distribution of this material to all conducive recipients of your personal address books. Of course, you may also send only the following permalink:
What should concern us is who stands in the way of solution, and why.
mike montagne
HILLARY’S CAMPAIGN LIE ??REGARDING CLEANING UP THE MESS
Anyone who has followed these pages for the last fifteen or twenty years knows I’ve been advocating mathematically perfected economy? for a long while, that I’ve demonstrated the consequences of the imposed system over that whole while, and that I’ve done my best to hold purported representatives accountable.
During the recent campaign, Senator Hillary Clinton boasted often that it took a Clinton to clean up the mess left by the first Bush, and that it would take a Clinton to clean up the mess left by the second. She boasted also that her husband presided over the false and failed bubble of the Dot Com era, telling us again and again that this was the greatest industrial expansion of modern history.
Where were you, if you actually think so?
The thing Mrs. Clinton refers to by such obtuse terms as a “mess,” is also a lie.
I’m not about to defend George Bush, who is perhaps the worst president in our history. It’s difficult for me to imagine we could suffer worse. Bush of course did compound or escalate the demise of our country by failing to arrest the causes of our monetary failure. But what we need to understand is it is not the President per se which simply multiplies our national, public and private debt. It is the system; and without a President, Congress, and/or Supreme Court which abide by the law, and are friendly to actual solution, so we will only have more of the same.
In any case, many of us believe the Bill Clinton (and now, Hillary Clinton) lie, that Mr. Clinton balanced the federal budget. If in fact he did do so, how did he do so?
There of course was no real increase in public income, for ten years after the fact only a handful of survivors of the supposed Dot Com boom actually had made a penny of profit, while real industry was expatriated from the country. There was no increase in tax rates or revenues, for our industry was so marginalized already, and so posed to take the fall it would suffer under the subsequent Bush Administration, that we could not have afforded increased tax rates, or increased interest rates either. Nor was there a commensurable decrease in federal spending.
How then could there have been a balancing of the federal budget? Well, any *genuine* accountant would tell that there couldn’t have been.
So this “cleaning up” of a “mess” which Hillary Clinton so falsely boasts of is something we’re going to endure under the present administration, which she of course will gladly participate in ??not of course to solve the problems or causes of inevitable failure, but to preserve the very system of exploitation which is responsible for our inevitable collapse.
You remember of course that Bill Clinton raided other federal assets to claim he had balanced the budget, much as states are now selling assets the people paid for merely to pretend accountability under a system of inevitable failure, which all the puppets of the plutocracy work to preserve upon us. What was the consequence of Mr. Clinton’s robbing Peter to pay Paul?
The math differs according to sources, but some estimates are that the consequence to so called social security was so devastating that as much as over a hundred trillion dollars of near term, unfunded federal liabilities exist in the wake of those robberies. Just on the account of the lie of social security then, the Clinton’s mis-doings, which Hillary Clinton now calls “cleaning up a mess,” have imposed a hundred-trillion “dollars” of liability on future generations, which Mrs. and Mr. Clinton merely refrain from calling a debt, to falsely claim they balanced the federal budget.
How does this shake out?
Largely it appeals to the eldest generation, who are the last to maintain any false faith in the guilty parties ??but only of course for their own sakes. This misdoing has kept the co-perpetrators voting for the powers that be from either party of betrayal; and this pathetic prevailing misdeed of course gives the principal perpetrators the green light to sell our future to satan himself, so long as the perpetrators can take so much unearned gains as to loan themselves millions to take the presidency.
But that isn’t the end of the numbers. If you divide the hundred-trillion amongst far less than a hundred-million elders who so narcissistically parade their wealth and success, and who have incurred over their lifetimes almost the whole brunt of this expense which they so gladly defer to their own projeny, you find that their actual wealth is far from what would sustain their cheap million-dollar homes alongside every town’s fairways.
Oh sure, it pisses them off to high satan when grandson calls grandfather on the inconsistency of it; but the truth is, when you divide just this hundred trillion among the less than hundred-million who have incurred its costs, and even gave way to the system which could only engender all these things, you find on average that their net “wealth” is about a negative million “dollars” apiece.
Thank you Hillary, for giving me the opportunity to point that out to Americans who I hope will rise against you. After all, the only reason grandfather would have to insist this artificial debt be imposed upon grandson, is that he doesn’t have the spine to call you on it.
Many of you may remember how Bill Clinton boasted of his balancing the budget in (shoot, I forget the year offhand) a state of the union speech. He commended himself with an expression, “something which was previously thought to be mathematically impossible.” (Something like that.)
I never wrote Mr. Clinton of course that it was mathematically impossible to balance the federal budget. On the contrary, I explained it was mathematically impossible to sustain a vital circulation without perpetually multiplying the sum of debt in proportion to the circulation, so much as the periodic interest on an ever greater sum of debt. Which of course is exactly what happened.
Would Mr. Clinton (or Mrs. Clinton) take the issue up with me personally? Absolutely not; and you know why. No one has ever disproven the proposition that any purported economy subject to exploitation by interest, inherently multiplies debt in proportion to the circulation until the system eventually succumbs to a terminal sum of debt.
How high is the Clinton’s leadership then?
Ten years after, she’s still perpetuating the lie of it, hoping you’ll never know the difference.
Maybe you won’t. No, instead of replying, Clinton lied to the whole country; and for those 8 years of effort, the only form of the Clinton’s response was to send 8 years of Christmas Cards. I think maybe the first three of them, I opened.
Visit http://www.change.gov/page/s/yourvision to pressure the Obama Transition Team to adopt mathematically perfected economy?. I’m aware the president-elect is hiring all the wrong people; but the fact you demanded representation when you could draws the line between the bad guys ??and the rest. Make sure you mention mathematically perfected economy? explicitly (maybe even providing a link to these pages), or your appeal may be lost in the ever escalating number of late comers who pretend to advocate a solution which existed long before them.
“To find the players in all the corruption of the world, ‘Follow the money.’ To find the captains of world corruption, follow the money all the way.”
mike montagne ??founder, PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy?, author/engineer of mathematically perfected economy? (1979)
? COPYRIGHT 2008, by mike montagne and PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy?.
Except for profit making ventures or entities otherwise granted explicit permission to publish this copyright material, this article may be distributed or reprinted in whole only, from and including any quotes preceding its title, through and inclusive of the following permalink(s), by email or otherwise. Visitors may also download our entire directory of regular/main site articles from our downloads page: http://perfecteconomy.com/pg-free-pfmpe-downloads.html. If you want to save your country, we encourage personal distribution of this material to all conducive recipients of your personal address books. Of course, you may also send only the following permalink:
What should concern us is who stands in the way of solution, and why.
mike montagne
HILLARY’S CAMPAIGN DEBTS ??RESPONSE TO MESSAGE FROM JOE BIDEN
This article responds to a message from Joe Biden, in part which reads:
President-elect Obama and I have been assembling our team, [1]?and we plan to hit the ground running next month.
We want to be ready to go, and that’s why I’m asking you to help us honor [2]?an outstanding commitment we made during the election.
[3]?Our campaign pledged to help Senator Hillary Clinton — one of the vital members of our team and our future Secretary of State — retire her campaign debt.[4]?That’s the money her campaign owes to the vendors across the country that make our political process possible.
Dear Joe,
Particularly as I have sent scores of appeals for you to respond to mathematically perfected economy?, I am particularly offended by certain aspects of your appeal that we pay for Senator Clinton’s gamble to take the presidency with borrowed monetary clout, rather than actual support from anyone who might have presumed Mrs. Clinton offered actual solution to the issues facing our country, and particularly to solution of the present, artificial prospect of world wide monetary failure.
Curiously, though John Podesta’s recent letter claims that all the posts to change.gov are read and archived, I don’t find any of my posts advocating mathematically perfected economy? archived there at all. Why wouldn’t people be able to read careful explanations that there is one and one only solution to 1) inflation and deflation, 2) systemic manipulation of the cost or value of money or property, and 3) inherent, irreversible, and inevitably terminal multiplication of debt in proportion to the vital, obligated circulation, Mr. Biden? Most conscientious citizens would think that if no one ??and particularly this new administration ??can demonstrate even how it is possible to maintain a vital circulation without multiplying debt into an eventually terminal sum of debt (to which idea of course, all data concurs), that the prospect of mathematically perfected economy? is the only direction a responsible republic would head, particularly unless the actual opportunity of the people to govern themselves were usurped. Why would you not participate in diligent discussion of that proposition, Mr. Biden?
We both know the answer, which of course raises my first objection to your recent message. Because I tried even so strenuously to contact your campaign and Mr. Obama’s campaign regarding the proposition of mathematically perfected economy?, I find it remarkable that during the whole campaign both candidates refused to address the fundamental/categoric faults of the imposed monetary system. When you say, “we plan to hit the ground running next month [1],” what you actually mean is that with the very perpetrators of this criminal system welcomed into your administration, and while purposely avoiding any discussion of the one, ready plan which can not only save “our” “economy,” but do so without cost, you hope to preserve the imposed system of exploitation, even as it can only multiply debt beyond the terminal sums of debt which now threaten the world with inevitable monetary failure.
Then you tell us [2, 3], that you made an outstanding commitment to help Senator Hillary Clinton retire her campaign debt. If she had earned the money she gambled on the presidency by the sweat of her brow, and if that gamble were not itself an affront to the principles of representation, I might think, “how nice,” Mr. Biden. But in fact then what this commitment meant, which we only learn about now, is that no matter who we voted for, we would get the same team ??all of the members of which, predictably, refuse to discuss or debate this proposition of mathematically perfected economy?, either. Isn’t that a remarkable coincidence, Mr. Biden, particularly as none of you have ever proven that there is another possible solution to 1) inflation and deflation, 2) systemic manipulation of the cost or value of money or property, and 3) inherent, irreversible, and inevitably terminal multiplication of debt in proportion to the vital, obligated circulation?
As I wrote you and Mr. Obama months ago, Mr. Biden, by the time your ill-conceived, pretended course to reparation *might* mature under even far greater indebtedness than has precipitated the present events, worse conditions will prevail; we will be less able to afford the jobs you propose you can create, and which are only obstructed by the inherent multiplication of indebtedness engendered by the system you intend preserve; and, most obviously, we may lose more jobs by then than you pretend to create, but will actually only allow, despite further multiplication of indebtedness, by imposing further costs upon us.
Not only is your preposterous proposition and team ill conceived to accomplish such absurd purposes then, Mr. Biden, the fact is, what you propose as better will actually be to be worse off than we are now.
So despite the simple math, versus the pretended math of simpletons, what you’re actually asking us for Mr. Biden, is to honor your commitment to ensure we had no candidate to represent us, and that we will have no officer to represent us. Anyone who offers you a cent then, paves the way to the final destruction of our country.
Visit http://www.change.gov/page/s/yourvision to pressure the Obama Transition Team to adopt mathematically perfected economy?. I’m aware the president-elect is hiring all the wrong people; but the fact you demanded representation when you could draws the line between the bad guys ??and the rest.
“To find the players in all the corruption of the world, ‘Follow the money.’ To find the captains of world corruption, follow the money all the way.”
mike montagne ??founder, PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy?, author/engineer of mathematically perfected economy? (1979)
? COPYRIGHT 2008, by mike montagne and PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy?.
Except for profit making ventures or entities otherwise granted explicit permission to publish this copyright material, this article may be distributed or reprinted in whole only, from and including any quotes preceding its title, through and inclusive of the following permalink(s), by email or otherwise. Visitors may also download our entire directory of regular/main site articles from our downloads page: http://perfecteconomy.com/pg-free-pfmpe-downloads.html. If you want to save your country, we encourage personal distribution of this material to all conducive recipients of your personal address books. Of course, you may also send only the following permalink:
I appreciate the digging for the truth, but this is still a step short.
The “markets” (subjects) are not “correcting” some anomalous behavior to its proper result. In fact, that ostensible result is neither defined nor then agreed upon; and certainly, it isn’t even possible under the imposed system to rectify commerce to the usual concept of the subjects ??that they should be able to trade their production for whatever they deem to be equal measures of the production of others.
The stupefied concept of “correction” therefore cannot even be said to return to such a goal, because as a system which inherently and irreversibly multiplies debt into terminal debt remains subject to ever greater proportional indebtedness, any eventual state of what you wrongly call a “correction” leaves ever greater unearned taking *from* the pool of wealth to the mere publishers of *our* promises to pay each other.
Likewise, neither then are we restrained from “correction” by some ostensible regulation, for on the contrary, what restrains us from a bona fide correction to the desirable state where we can trade our production for the equivalent production of others is the very system itself, which in the very form of the obfuscated currency, compels us to service ever greater debt, all to the ever greater and ultimately terminal unearned taking of the mere issuers of our promises to pay each other.
All you have here then is the inevitable result of allowing a pretended creditor to usurp the role of the real creditor, imposing upon real creditor and debtor, a form of currency which can only multiply debt in proportion to the circulation, until we succumb to a terminal sum of debt. You remark loosely about the consequences, and lament the failure to correct, when the real cause is so simple and rectifiable, if it weren’t for those who intend to preserve the iniquities of the system so that they can take from it.
The real problem isn’t that we can’t identify this cause or solve it, because I did so thirty years ago. I also provided the first term of the Reagan Administration with computer models which projected that implemented rates of interest and growth would multiply debt in proportion to the circulation until we suffered a terminal sum of debt at approximately 2010 AD.
That was 25 years ago; and those models (which you can still download from our pages and run the same numbers to render the same projections) have accurately projected the accumulation of debt since, merely by replicating the very process the unassenting subjects of the system are required to meet, merely to maintain a vital circulation. That is, to maintain a vital circulation, the models simply borrow back principal and interest paid out of the general circulation, as subsequent sums of debt which of course perpetually increase by ever greater increments of periodic interest on an ever greater sum of debt, until the costs of servicing an eventual, terminal sum of debt exceed the entire circulation. The reason this sum of debt is terminal of course, is that the previous sum of debt already requires all it is possible to pay, and the resultant, terminal sum of debt requires even more ??a cost of servicing debt which is impossible to meet.
Perhaps this sounds familiar. Perhaps in your unique obfuscations of “corrections” and the like, which obviously are not natural phenomena, but imposed, man made consequences of all the unearned taking… perhaps instead you fall among those who intend somehow to perpetuate this purportedly noble crime. If there weren’t so many of the latter obviously, we would have resolved these simple issues thirty years ago, that none of us would have cause to make these remarks.
The real end of an era then is only so certain as the rest of us are ready to account for the obvious. We have but few issues here, and specifically/categorically, those issues are 1) inflation and deflation, 2) systemic manipulation of the cost or value of money or property, and 3) inherent, irreversible multiplication of debt in proportion to a circulation.
As to the latter issue, which of course is the principal cause the present terminal conditions (and irreversible furtherance of those conditions to the worse), what we have to realize is that the producer is the real creditor, because they are forced to take a promise to pay (note) from the debtor. Ordinarily, in a system where the promise can be guaranteed (as in mathematically perfected economy?), the debtor issues their promise, because after all, it *is* *their* promise.
What we have effectively is a third party which intervenes upon this natural relationship, obstructing the debtor from issuing their promise to pay on their paper. This extrinsic party, which produces nothing and yet will eventually and quite injuriously acquire title to all property merely for the resultant obfuscation, merely publishes the promise of the debtor at virtually no cost to the extrinsic party, claiming all the while that the costless promise is equivalent then as it might later be, if we give scope to it, to the wealth we attempt to trade as that form of currency multiplies indebtedness until we succumb to a terminal sum of debt.
The present exercise then is hardly intellectual, because it carefully avoids recognizing these simple facts and their inevitable ramifications.
From the very beginning, the problem was the facades, corruption,, and escalating injustice of the very system which was imposed upon us despite political promises to the contrary. Now we attempt to perpetuate those arguments in favor of preserving the system, hoping for “corrections,” or justice against a stronger tide, sweeping justice away at an inherently escalating rate?
There’s no chance of succeeding there; but of course you can try for “your share” of unearned taking if you promote any of the obvious forms of exploitation without of course declaring that goal. But you’ll still be a wee fish in a tank with an alpha predator which can only grow.
For the rest of us however, the only possible solution is mathematically perfected economy?, because it’s the singular possible solution to 1) inflation and deflation, 2) systemic manipulation of the cost or value of money or property, and 3) inherent, irreversible multiplication of debt in proportion to a circulation ??and because we can transform the present system to mathematically perfected economy? immediately, and without cost.
The only thing which actually stands in the way then, is all the material such as this, which focuses us elsewhere.
Visit http://www.change.gov/page/s/yourvision to pressure the Obama Transition Team to adopt mathematically perfected economy?. I’m aware the president-elect is hiring all the wrong people; but the fact you demanded representation when you could draws the line between the bad guys ??and the rest.
“To find the players in all the corruption of the world, ‘Follow the money.’ To find the captains of world corruption, follow the money all the way.”
mike montagne ??founder, PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy?, author/engineer of mathematically perfected economy? (1979)
? COPYRIGHT 2008, by mike montagne and PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy?.
Except for profit making ventures or entities otherwise granted explicit permission to publish this copyright material, this article may be distributed or reprinted in whole only, from and including any quotes preceding its title, through and inclusive of the following permalink(s), by email or otherwise. Visitors may also download our entire directory of regular/main site articles from our downloads page: http://perfecteconomy.com/pg-free-pfmpe-downloads.html. If you want to save your country, we encourage personal distribution of this material to all conducive recipients of your personal address books. Of course, you may also send only the following permalink:
What should concern us is who stands in the way of solution, and why.
mike montagne
JOHN PODESTA PRETENDS OBAMA-BIDEN TRANSITION TEAM TRANSPARENCY
John Podesta writes:
Dear mike,
Everyday, we meet with organizations that present ideas for the Transition and the incoming Obama-Biden Administration. In past transitions, meetings like this have been held behind closed doors.
Not anymore. Today, every Obama-Biden Transition staff member received a memo outlining the “Seat at the Table” Transparency Policy. I’ve included a copy of it below.
The policy is pretty simple: the people and groups we’re meeting with, the subjects of the meetings, and any documents shared in the meetings will now be made available on Change.gov. Most importantly, the American public can weigh in with comments or their own materials.
Read the memo and watch our “Seat at the Table” video:
This is our latest step toward a more transparent and accessible Transition. We look forward to benefitting from the many more voices that will now be a part of the decision-making process.
Thank you,
John
The transition team’s “Seat at the Table Video” is hosted below:
I’ve sent scores of appeals to Obama-Biden, arguing/establishing not only a)?how mathematically perfected economy? is the one and only solution to a system which can only engender inflation and deflation, undesirable, systemic manipulation of the cost or value of money or property, and inherent, irreversible, and terminal multiplication of debt by interest; b)?but further demonstrating how mathematically perfected economy? solves all the issues immediately, and virtually without cost. The video claims all posts by citizens are visible, and that the transition team reads/studies all submissions. But if you search for “Montagne,” “perfected economy,” and so forth, you won’t turn up a single submission from PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy?.
There is no integrity to this purported transparency whatever; and I’ll tell you why: Because the Obama-Biden Administration has already hired a new set of foxes to guard the chicken coop; and because they already know they are wrong.
There is nothing outrageous or disruptive about actual solution. Second-graders should be able to understand that if you define inflation and deflation respectively as increases or decreases in circulation per whatever wealth the circulation is intended to represent, that you can only solve inflation and deflation by maintaining a circulation which at all times is equal to the remaining value of the wealth the circulation is intended to represent. Second-graders should be able to understand that you can only do that if we pay the principal only off, at the rate of depreciation or consumption of the wealth ??and that it is impossible to do so if the promise to pay of the debtor is subject to interest, not even charged by the actual creditor, who produces or turns over the related property. Second-graders should be able to understand that if such a circulation is subject to interest, that merely to continue servicing monetary obligations (principal plus interest) which exceed the circulation (principal), it is necessary to perpetually re-borrow principal and interest paid out of the general circulation as ever greater sums of debt, perpetually increased so much as periodic interest. Second-graders should be able to understand that this ever-escalating accumulation of debt in proportion to the obligated circulation eventually and inevitably engenders a terminal sum of debt. Second-graders should be able to understand therefore, that they only possible solution is mathematically perfected economy?.
Many months ago I outlined how even optimistic rates of maturation of Obama’s far-fetched plan to revitalized a dying system had little hope even to offset the further consequences we would suffer by the time his far-fetched plan could be tested. He has not even taken office yet, and second-graders should be able to understand he will fail:
One of the most preposterous pages of this purportedly open, transparent process, is titled “President-elect Barack Obama lays out key parts of Economic Recovery Plan” (Saturday, December 6, 2008 06:00 AM EST). Of course, these are the things that a genuine campaign of capable authorities would have declared to the electorate. Now, we are dictated an eleventh hour solution, which has no proof, and is easily itself invalidated by the simple tests of the most casual critical thinking.
Note that the preceding video only hopes to create 2.5 million jobs by 2011. Not only does it fail to offer a plausible explanation how we are to afford consuming the production of those jobs, or sustaining those jobs under a system which can only multiply debt into even more critical or terminal conditions by 2011, but the page I have just cited states, “Yesterday we learned that our economy has lost 2 million jobs since the recession began 11 months ago.”
So the president-elect is even 39 days still from inauguration, and we can see my prediction has practically come true: We have almost lost *already* the jobs he *hopes* only to create, and which we will not be able to afford sustaining under even greater debt. Indeed, look around you, and everything you see as a proposition, except mathematically perfected economy?, involves taking on greater cost and greater debt.
So not only do we have mere pretended transparency; we have a developing scandal of the greatest proportions, because the Obama-Biden team has ignored every appeal to implement mathematically perfected economy?, because the Obama-Biden team has in fact hired all the lowliest advocates of the system of exploitation which can only engender the world wide failure we shall soon experience, and because the only purpose of those advocates is to preserve that system of exploitation.
We are denied the immediate and cost free solution of mathematically perfected economy? therefore not because all the king’s horses and all the king’s men could not understand that mathematically perfected economy? is the singular solution which can save us, but because they so well know that they have no argument capable of invalidating the proposition of mathematically perfected economy? that they dare not even include scores of appeals in their pretended archives.
Visit http://www.change.gov/page/s/yourvision to pressure the Obama Transition Team to adopt mathematically perfected economy?. I’m aware the president-elect is hiring all the wrong people; but the fact you demanded representation when you could draws the line between the bad guys ??and the rest.
“To find the players in all the corruption of the world, ‘Follow the money.’ To find the captains of world corruption, follow the money all the way.”
mike montagne ??founder, PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy?, author/engineer of mathematically perfected economy? (1979)
? COPYRIGHT 2008, by mike montagne and PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy?.
Except for profit making ventures or entities otherwise granted explicit permission to publish this copyright material, this article may be distributed or reprinted in whole only, from and including any quotes preceding its title, through and inclusive of the following permalink(s), by email or otherwise. Visitors may also download our entire directory of regular/main site articles from our downloads page: http://perfecteconomy.com/pg-free-pfmpe-downloads.html. If you want to save your country, we encourage personal distribution of this material to all conducive recipients of your personal address books. Of course, you may also send only the following permalink:
What should concern us is who stands in the way of solution, and why.
mike montagne
JOINT CENTER FOR POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC STUDIES REJECTS MATHEMATICALLY PERFECTED ECONOMY??
Wednesday, Margaret Brown of the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies returned my call, which requested to know whether the JCPES would be interested in mathematically perfected economy?. Upon my brief explanation that MPE? involved mathematic proofs a)?that any purported economy subject to interest ultimately terminates itself under insoluble debt; and b)?that there is one and one only integral solution for 1)?inflation and deflation, 2)?systemic manipulation of the cost or value of money or property, and 3)?inherent, irreversible, and inevitably terminal multiplication of debt in proportion to the vital, obligated circulation, Margaret Brown simply answered, “That doesn’t sound like anything that would be on our agenda.”
Visit http://www.change.gov/page/s/yourvision to pressure the Obama Transition Team to adopt mathematically perfected economy?. I’m aware the president-elect is hiring all the wrong people; but the fact you demanded representation when you could draws the line between the bad guys ??and the rest.
“To find the players in all the corruption of the world, ‘Follow the money.’ To find the captains of world corruption, follow the money all the way.”
mike montagne ??founder, PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy?, author/engineer of mathematically perfected economy? (1979)
? COPYRIGHT 2008, by mike montagne and PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy?.
Except for profit making ventures or entities otherwise granted explicit permission to publish this copyright material, this article may be distributed or reprinted in whole only, from and including any quotes preceding its title, through and inclusive of the following permalink(s), by email or otherwise. Visitors may also download our entire directory of regular/main site articles from our downloads page: http://perfecteconomy.com/pg-free-pfmpe-downloads.html. If you want to save your country, we encourage personal distribution of this material to all conducive recipients of your personal address books. Of course, you may also send only the following permalink:
What should concern us is who stands in the way of solution, and why.
mike montagne
NEGATIVE/CONTESTED FEEDBACK EXAMPLE
I’ve been doing battle with “economics” professors and pundits for 30 years. Now that the exploitation system has indeed begun to fall as my thesis of inevitable failure and computer models so long ago predicted, it has been a long time since I’ve received any negative or argumentative feedback, asserting alternate propositions. Not that I couldn’t find naysayers immediately. Ron Paul supporters are the stalwarts of non-solution, regularly advocating a return to the gold standard no matter how many times you prove to them, its impossible; the gold/silver standard cannot sustain unlimited industry/prosperity (which is the principal reason it’s always demoted to fractional reserve implementations); and most of all, the gold/silver standard cannot arrest inherent multiplication of debt ??which of course is the principal cause of failure. I assert in return then that to persist in advocating disproven propositions is the greatest deterrent to solution.
There are people who just “don’t get it,” and there are others still who are stuck on whatever rationalizations buoy them in whatever necessary ways, that they can persist in resisting solution. The following letter which I received yesterday is such an example. I furnish it because it merely trudges again the same steps so many others have taken before them, without even seeing our pages already invalidate its assertions.
Nonetheless of course, I answered the letter because it illustrates the quality or kind of thinking/ego which obstructs from the rest of us (as best it can), what we have to do to avoid utter monetary failure. Ponder then how this person advocates exploitation:
To whom it may concern,
I noticed at the end of the latest email it was said that pfmpe would for a $100,000 do a 100 year mortgage at 0% giving a payment of $83.33 per month…. It then went on to say that this would solve the housing crisis.
Did anyone REALLY think about this statement? What happens to all of the people who just don’t pay and have not taken care of the house? What happens to all of the people who max out their income with payments? There would still be a crisis because people ALWAYS want more. This is not an American situation it is a human situation. People want more and more.
No one would be willing to invest if they cannot get a return on their money but the possibility exists that they could lose it. The MPE will NEVER EXIST it is not in the nature of people to risk with no possible reward.
[respondent]
MY REPLY
Of course someone *really thought* about that mathematic relationship:
Eventually, multiplication of debt makes it impossible to pay; and all along the way of multiplication of debt in proportion to the circulation, it is ever less possible to pay. How do you blame non-payment on the subjects of the exploitation you advocate, when the system itself makes it impossible, particularly at the final states of the limited lifespan of usury?
What “happens” to them under mathematically perfected economy, is they make themselves subjects of a system in which *they always can* pay.
As to your assertion of a crisis where people “always want more,” what are you saying then, but that the exploitation you advocate prevents them from having what they want?
As to wanting more and more irrespective to consequences then, that is the desire of the very exploiter ??who is deprived of the coercive conditions in which they can do so, when the people can pay *their debts to each other* without involuntary servitude first imposed by the nature of the imposed currency, and thereafter imposed by the lack of solubility that currency can only leave them.
You only advocate further exploitation upon the first exploitation; and no one but no one but no one has ever demonstrated how that actually serves mankind, for to teach them alone would certainly far cheaper and less criminal. On the contrary, your very terms expose your want as a dispossession, ostensibly justified only because the dispossessed are no better than to know no better. Evidently then even, you think your advocation makes you better than me, for why should anyone deserve an opportunity to exploit for instance, their own progeny, or oppressed masses, simply deprived by time or other disadvantage from exploiting likewise, in return?
Of course, in mathematically perfected economy?, no one would be willing to “invest” (exploit), because the very chance for *unearned profit* is eliminated. But of course, that’s a just and even necessary purpose, if you are subject to exploitation, and particularly to a terminal form of exploitation; and it’s the exact contrary purpose only of advocates of exploitation ??so why don’t you just say that? We already know who you are.
So, no [respondent], it’s not in the nature of exploiters to exploit when the people are given a way to avoid exploitation for illimitable unearned gain. You advocate that simply because you have no leverage by which to exploit us otherwise.
Your argument therefore is merely a pathological statement: You say you should save humanity from its perpetual want of more, when it is only your perpetual want of more which is the problem. Of course, that’s always been the only argument of exploitation.
It is also the pattern of exploitation that when you exploit the exploited to the degree they can no longer pay… to blame *their* ostensible want of ever more for the eventual insolubility, isn’t it?
Sure, you thought about the same statement. But not well, and quite transparently.
Visit http://www.change.gov/page/s/yourvision to pressure the Obama Transition Team to adopt mathematically perfected economy?. I’m aware the president-elect is hiring all the wrong people; but the fact you demanded representation when you could draws the line between who are the bad guys, and who are the good.
“To find the players in all the corruption of the world, ‘Follow the money.’ To find the captains of world corruption, follow the money all the way.”
mike montagne ??founder, PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy?, author/engineer of mathematically perfected economy? (1979)
? COPYRIGHT 2008, by mike montagne and PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy?.
Except for profit making ventures or entities otherwise granted explicit permission to publish this copyright material, this article may be distributed or reprinted in whole only, from and including any quotes preceding its title, through and inclusive of the following permalink(s), by email or otherwise. Visitors may also download our entire directory of regular/main site articles from our downloads page: http://perfecteconomy.com/pg-free-pfmpe-downloads.html. If you want to save your country, we encourage personal distribution of this material to all conducive recipients of your personal address books. Of course, you may also send only the following permalink:
The citizen is sovereign only when he can retain and enjoy the fruits of his labor. If the government has first claim on his property he must learn to genuflect before it. When the right of property is abrogated, all the other rights of the individual are undermined, and to speak of the sovereign citizen who has no absolute right to property is to talk nonsense. It is like saying that the slave is free because he is allowed to do anything he wants to do (even vote, if you wish) except to own what he produces.
Frank Chodorov, The Freeman, August 1990
RESPONSE TO CATHERINE AUSTIN FITTS’ FINE BLOG ON THE G-20 SUMMIT
Truly excellent translation. One of our readers sent me here.
While I salute your exemplary expression of these truths however, I’m compelled to raise the missing link.
It’s impossible to do so without some first person singular, but, to distill the essential story… in 1983 I provided the Reagan Administration with mathematic proofs and computer models (complete with source code which you can still download and run from our pages), that not only would he fail to balance the federal budget or offset price inflation, but that this very day would arrive. In other words, given 1983 numbers and reasonable anticipation of de-escalated interest rates, those computer models projected a U.S. monetary collapse under terminal sums of debt, potentially/probably drawing the rest of the world down with it, at approximately 2010 AD.
But the missing link I raise is solution. In other words, unless we ascertain cause, we cannot resolve whatever process is responsible for effect. These models or their related thesis therefore comprise the real, underlying cause (versus myriad consequences).
Jumping back a few years further regarding this question of cause and solution, in 1979 I published a mathematic proof that a) any economy subject to interest ultimately terminates itself under insoluble debt; and b) that there is one and one only integral solution to 1) inflation and deflation, 2) systemic manipulation of the cost or value of money or property, and 3) inherent, irreversible, terminal multiplication of debt by interest.
Thomas Jefferson fairly well identified the principal cause of failure (a), which is the principle by which said models projected this failure; but as no one since developed the singular solution (b), all subsequent history to the present is the consequence.
Jefferson nonetheless said, “If the American People *ever* allow the banks to issue their currency, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and [bank owned] corporations which *will* grow up around them *will* deprive the people of *all* property, until their children wake *homeless* on the continent their fathers conquered.”
This perception falls just short of solution, because if you unravel it you will find that “first by inflation and then by deflation” refers not just to intentional alteration of the circulation, but to simultaneous processes which engender inevitable failure. That is, merely to maintain a vital circulation subject to interest requires that we re-borrow whatever we pay toward principal and interest, as subsequent sums of debt, perpetually increased so much as periodic interest. Thus a sum of debt will multiply by ever escalating increments of periodic interest on an ever greater sum of debt, until we can no longer afford to service a further sum of debt ??with this final stage of the lifespan therefore comprising a state where we can neither borrow further as is necessary to maintain a vital circulation. Then of course, the whole system comes down.
Franklin, Jefferson, Jackson, Lincoln, and many others gave serious attention to the problem, but never solved it.
Nonetheless, there are two sides to the coin. The first is recognition of the crime/problem. But this is to no avail if we aren’t going to recognize/implement solution. Still however, neither is the latter idea to any avail if there is one and one only solution, and we propose to implement anything less.
But as I say, I published a proof of singular solution in 1979; and, since then, not only has that proposition been tested/challenged by academia, it is effectively proven inversely by the culmination of present circumstances.
Since 1975, I have been referring to the solution as mathematically perfected economy?.
Our website of course provides substantial invalidations of contending theories. But I invite you to see two of our pages in particular, which readers have recently reported to register the present circumstances in such a way that they finally understand the differences between loss/failure of satellite banks, collapse of the system, and integral solution:
mike montagne ??founder, PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy?, author/engineer of mathematically perfected economy? (1979)
Visit http://www.change.gov/page/s/yourvision to pressure the Obama Transition Team to adopt mathematically perfected economy?. I’m aware the president-elect is hiring all the wrong people; but the fact you demanded representation when you could draws the line between who are the bad guys, and who are the good.
“To find the players in all the corruption of the world, ‘Follow the money.’ To find the captains of world corruption, follow the money all the way.”
mike montagne ??founder, PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy?, author/engineer of mathematically perfected economy? (1979)
? COPYRIGHT 2008, by mike montagne and PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy?.
Except for profit making ventures or entities otherwise granted explicit permission to publish this copyright material, this article may be distributed or reprinted in whole only, from and including any quotes preceding its title, through and inclusive of the following permalink(s), by email or otherwise. Visitors may also download our entire directory of regular/main site articles from our downloads page: http://perfecteconomy.com/pg-free-pfmpe-downloads.html. If you want to save your country, we encourage personal distribution of this material to all conducive recipients of your personal address books. Of course, you may also send only the following permalink:
While 12,000 homes a day continue to go into foreclosure, mathematically perfected economy™ would re-finance a $100,000 home with a hundred-year lifespan at the overall rate of $1,000 per year or $83.33 per month. Without costing us anything, we would immediately become as much as 12 times as liquid on present revenue. Transitioning to MPE™ would apply all payments already made against existent debt toward principal. Many of us would be debt free. There would be no housing crisis, no credit crisis. Unlimited funding would immediately be available to sustain all the industry we are capable of.
There is no other solution. Regulation can only temper an inherently terminal process.
If you are not promoting mathematically perfected economy™, then you condemn us to monetary failure.
COPYRIGHT 1979-2009 by mike montagne and PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy™. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. TRADEMARKS: PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy™, Mathematically Perfected Economy™, Mathematically Perfected Currency™, MPE™, and PFMPE™ are trademarks of mike montagne and PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy™, perfecteconomy.com. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
RELATED MATERIAL
SUBSCRIBE to RSS FEED.
COPYRIGHT 1979-2009 by mike montagne and PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy™. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. TRADEMARKS: PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy™, Mathematically Perfected Economy™, Mathematically Perfected Currency™, MPE™, and PFMPE™ are trademarks of mike montagne and PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy™, perfecteconomy.com. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
BEST VIEWED WITH MOZILLA FIREFOX™.