PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy™ (PFMPE™) : mathematically perfected economy™ (MPE™) is the singular integral solution to 1) inflation and deflation, 2) systemic manipulation of the cost or value of money or property, and 3) inherent, irreversible multiplication of debt in proportion to a vital circulation, engendering inevitable systemic failure at a finite system lifespan defined by an inevitable, terminal sum of insoluble debt. Mathematically Perfected Economy™ is every prospective debtor's right to issue their promise to pay, free of extrinsic manipulation, adulteration, or exploitation of that promise, or the natural opportunity to make good on it.
mike montagne's mathematically perfected economy™ BLOG
YOU ARE VIEWING ARTICLES IN THE FOLLOWING CATEGORY (SELECT CATEGORIES FROM THE DIRECTORY, RIGHT):
mike montagne’s mathematically perfected economy blog » AUSTRIAN SCHOOL
The suggested method of browsing the articles of this blog is to select the mathematically perfected economy™ category from the blog directory (right). All articles are included in this category. Each page (top and bottom) will provide links to earlier sets of articles, which will allow you, page by page, to browse all content.
Imagine that you are designing the first combustion engine:
A prototype finally starts. It sputters; it coughs. It stumbles.
You envisioned smooth delivery of power ? efficient power. Your very initial objective was to achieve full possible power. So is an engine to cough? Is an engine barely to run?
No one would ever have built a decent engine if we exclaimed only how wonderful all the “running” amidst all the first sputtering.
Imposition of a central banking system on true free enterprise runs quite the opposite course. It takes a free running engine and irreversibly multiplies its debt until it can run no more. That it ran in the first place, that it ran for some time, and that it improved its production at times even faster than usury imposed ever greater oppression is no testament to the ostensible merits of usury; nor does it prove the subject commerce can sustain itself against the multiplying costs of debt forever.
In fact commerce is finite; and a system which can only multiply debt in proportion to commerce can only eventually exceed the capacity of finite commerce to support infinite, irreversible multiplication of debt in proportion to a circulation. Indeed, as ever more of such a circulation must be dedicated to servicing the multiplying debt, ever less of the circulation remains to sustain commerce.
The inherent collapse of a central banking system therefore approaches at an ever escalating rate, as the subject commerce struggles against all the malignant consequences of servicing perpetual multiplication of debt in proportion to the potential commerce which can survive to do so.
What should concern us is who stands in the way of solution, and why.
mike montagne
RESPONSE TO KUCINICH, BILBRAY, DODD, KASHKARI, HEARINGS ON ARRESTING FORECLOSURES
Infowars has posted a page with several videos showing Dennis Kucinich (D-OH, Chair) and Elijah Cummings (D-Maryland) of the Oversight Subcommittee on Domestic Policy, grilling Neel Kashkari of the Treasury Department about the handling of purported bailout funds, and the prospect there is going to be any tangible positive benefit of any potential policy changes/improvements. They ask questions about issues such as “negative equity,” which of course are ultimate consequences of price inflation and *intended* escalation of multiplication of debt. But the hearing raises no question which would exact the nature of the problem.
The following link opens the InfoWars page in a separate tab/window (comments I post to InfoWars regularly do not appear on their pages):
This is the page to which my comments respond, but I also embed the YouTube videos:
Elijah Cummings asks Neel Kashkari if he is a chump to AIG, which has given out 503 million dollars in bonuses, while taking 154 billion in taxpayer funds:
General questioning by Kucinich, which after establishing the background, questions what fundamental will solve any of the problems. In fact Kucinich is stating the conditions which require mathematically perfected economy™. He asks Kashkari what they are doing that is going to avoid a Tsunami of further foreclosures? What are they doing about negative equity? (There is nothing they can do; so they aren’t solving *anything*.):
Kucinich asks if the Secretary of the Treasury (Paulson) is even listening to Kashkari. Kashkari begs for an opportunity to give examples of how he is helping home owners, telling us that (if the system had its way) we would suffer even worse. Kucinich corrects Kashkari, who claims the Secretary (Paulson) is passionate about helping home owners, while in fact he has sent a signal to banks to do what they want with the money, and the bailout is virtually not going to help home owners at all:
Brian Bilbray (R-California) testifies that the federal government is very inefficient about managing such assets. Kashkari describes some hair-brained scheme “to attract private” capital to the rescue (which of course means 1) using the same circulation which should be committed to something else; and 2) *further indebtedness*):
Kucinich nails Kashkari, asking who he is really working for:
Kucinich questions preparation of testimony preceded the Treasury Departments subversion of the bailout act. Kashkari responds with ambiguous, unqualified claims of accomplishment and dedication… what he cares about, etc.. Kucinich replies that Paulson appears to have gutted the act and sent signals to banks that the foreclosure crisis isn’t something the bailout is necessarily even concerned about. Kucinich asks, “Hello, are we in a different universe here?” How do you reconcile the policy reversals?:
Senator Chris Dodd (D-Connecticut) questions Kashkari that banks receiving the bailout funds are actually using them to buy other banks:
Senator Chris Dodd (D-Connecticut) questions Kashkari about whatever techniques may be successful at arresting foreclosures. Kashkari responds he is passionate about doing so. But of course, all this could be arrested immediately by transitioning to mathematically perfected economy™. He CLAIMS to be looking for comprehensive solutions. Dodd reminds him every day of delay means another 10,000 foreclosures. Kashkari claims to understand the sense of urgency. But of course, we could stop all the foreclosures if he weren’t *more passionate* about exploitation:
RESPONSE TO INFOWARS PAGE (NOT PUBLISHED BY INFOWARS HOURS AFTER POSTED)
While to his credit, Mr. Kucinich exercises a serious posture, no one here is getting at the meat of the matter.
The reason there is a “crisis” is the imposed system inherently multiplies debt by ever escalating increments of ever greater periodic interest on an ever greater sum of debt. The crisis therefore is comprises of *inevitable* conditions, produce by a system which from its inception was intended to exploit the people as much as possible. While of course that process serves the people in no way whatsoever (because we who produce our production are the real creditors [being as we accept paper/whatever] can issue our own promises to pay without cost to extrinsic parties who produce nothing [the privatized “monetary” system]), its fault is that the underlying process, so long as it exists, is both irreversible and inevitably terminal.
How so?
So long as we maintain a circulation subject to this intended “privatization” of the people’s debts to each other (which merely imposes an extrinsic party as if they are the creditor), whatever we pay to the usurpers in the way of principal and interest must be re-borrowed as subsequent sums of debt, perpetually increased so much as periodic interest. So long as we maintain a circulation then, this process is irreversible; and, characteristically then, the inherent, irreversible multiplication indeed escalates by ever greater increments of ever greater sums of periodic interest on an ever greater sum of debt.
So, what are the questions we need to be asking?
What is the present *credit* crisis comprised of?
The crisis is the ultimate and inevitable culmination of a process which inherently and irreversibly multiplies debt in proportion to the circulation, until we can no longer afford to service the resultant sum of debt, and the system collapses. It is *an inherently terminal* system; and the only way to avoid its inevitable termination is to eliminate the *artificial* multiplication of debt.
Why aren’t the banks lending?
The banks *can’t* lend any more *because the system itself destroys credit-worthiness*; it destroys credit-worthiness to an ever greater degree across its limited lifespan; and ultimately, at the end of its life cycle, credit-worthiness is completely destroyed by a sum of indebtedness which we can no longer afford to service. In other words, the fact the banks are not lending itself is a testament of the critical fault of their system of exploitation. It is not justified in the least degree, because they are not the real creditors; but it is certainly one of the greatest crimes in history that *twice* we have allowed this illegitimate system to terminate “the world’s” “economies.”
Is this juncture not inevitable unless we perfect the system of inherent multiplication of debt?
Absolutely this juncture is inevitable. I provided computer models to the Reagan Administration in 1983 which calculated the maximum possible lifespan of any such system, and which projected that the terminal accumulation of debt would occur at approximately 2010 AD.
What is the consequence of the present destruction of *credit worthiness*?
So the system itself has destroyed credit-worthiness… and the present hearings are no more than a side show, unless they address the meat of the matter, which is this process of inherent multiplication of debt. But the consequence of arrested lending itself is the potential death knell of the system, because to maintain a *vital* circulation, we *absolutely must* not only be able to borrow perpetually, but at a perpetually escalating rate. To deny us this sole means of replenishing the circulation therefore means that surviving industry will absolutely be deprived of the circulation which is vital to sustaining itself against its obligation to service the sum of debt.
Denied that sole means of replenishing the circulation, the curtain will fall. Quite possibly before Obama takes office (not that he’s planning anything fundamentally different, and capable of saving us).
BUT THERE IS a solution; and I provided it to the Reagan Administration as well. On our page, “If I Were President…” I lay out exactly how to arrest the monetary in a day, and how to establish mathematically perfected economy in no more time than required to adopt existing infrastructures to manage the accounts of the people under mathematically perfected economy.
I will take on all naysayers here or elsewhere. Why Alex hasn’t had me on the show I don’t know, but I do know many people have asked him. Maybe Alex can disprove there is one and one only solution to 1) inflation and deflation, 2) systemic manipulation of the cost or value of money or property, and 3) inherent, irreversible, terminal multiplication of debt by interest.
These of course *are* all our problems. I published the solution in 1979. It’s available to Mr. Obama right now, and if I were anyone here who is truly concerned with rectification, I’d be visiting our pages at least, and putting the pressure on the president-elect to adopt mathematically perfected economy immediately.
As for Mr. Kashkari, he is as phony as phony gets. I wish I could answer each of these questions with its solution from the chair next to him. Mr. Kucinich, when are you going to have me testify in Washington?
Except for profit making ventures or entities otherwise granted explicit permission to publish this copyright material, this article may be distributed or reprinted in whole only, from and including any quotes preceding its title, through and inclusive of the following permalink(s), by email or otherwise. Visitors may also download our entire directory of regular/main site articles from our downloads page: http://perfecteconomy.com/pg-free-pfmpe-downloads.html. If you want to save your country, we encourage personal distribution of this material to all conducive recipients of your personal address books. Of course, you may also send only the following permalink:
What should concern us is who stands in the way of solution, and why.
mike montagne
MATHEMATICALLY PERFECTED ECONOMY™ AND GLOBAL WARMING
A politician who shall remain un-named, writes:
A former global warming denier should not be in charge of the fight against climate change.
Global climate change is perhaps the greatest challenge of our generation. What we do (or don’t do) affects not only our nation but the world.
You might think that, with a new president poised to take office, we’re in a great position to take serious action to address climate change. Unfortunately, a grizzled legislator named John Dingell, known as the “Congressman from General Motors,” is standing in our way.
[end of excerpt]
Obviously, the author is about to tell on his foes within government — that we are leaving foxes/rats in charge of the hen house.
Of course, because we can only know a tree by its fruit, it matters little that we may swap foxes for rats or vice versa. So my reply means to test this by raising what we do and do not know yet that we may or may not have to solve (which is to determine explicitly what we have to solve); the costs of doing whatever we must; and whatever then, altogether, is vital to accomplishing whatever we must.
This of course is standard procedure for engineering/accomplishing solution of any issue; and these of course are the real issues of accomplishing the author’s common initiative. But thus these few vital aspects determine whether the author himself is a fox or rat, because they pose the very test whether the author will take on even one readily solved and even artificial obstruction to his own initiative. After all, his mere one of many problems is an issue we can and would readily solve, if government itself were not our principal obstruction.
In other words, the ostensible representative cannot have and eat his cake too: if he indeed intends to succeed in his initiative, he cannot be parcel to the very thing which obstructs us from succeeding in all such initiatives.
PFMPE™ REPLY
This was my reply to his appeal:
Your points are well taken; and while I’m not certain exactly what the gravity of the global warming crisis is, I am well aware it is taking place; in fact friends and I were warning of signs of it before others were.
My proposition to you however is this:
Whether or not we can trace warming to specific emissions/gasses of whatever quantities and sorts, we need to throw credible science at this right away ? not biases from one side or the other of credible arguments, but concrete, certain science. From that of course, we have to draw credible, immediate plans. At the end of an expedited such process, we should have a concrete perspective of where man-caused warming falls within a whole, potentially even larger scheme of global pollution.
What I’m getting at is this:
We have technology and capacities to treat many of our problems already. But for one reason or another, we are not willing or we are not able to implement that technology.
Furthermore, we have some unexercised capacity to develop and deploy further technology; and likewise, we are either not willing or we are not able to implement that technology.
It doesn’t take a rocket scientist then, to ascertain how we have to go about this.
Why might we not be able to implement present and further technology?
Whatever our actual, natural limits, the only reason we “cannot” achieve what we are even prepared to do, is we can’t afford to.
Now, why are a people who even presently demonstrate they are capable of achieving something in all other necessary respects, simply obstructed from doing so by such exceedingly unnatural events as paying lifetime after lifetime for homes the same people produced by but a few months of work?
There is one and one reason only of course; and that is the purposed irregularities which have been imposed upon them for the purpose of their exploitation.
Even more critical however, is the fact that system of exploitation accomplishes its purposes by irreversible multiplication of debt *in proportion* to the potential for us to service debt: merely to maintain a vital circulation, we are compelled to perpetually re-borrow principal and interest as subsequent sums of debt, with the sum of debt thus inherently increasing at escalating rates of ever greater sums of periodic interest on an ever greater sum of debt.
In other words, Mr. [politician’s name], tomorrow, for a wholly artificial process of exploitation, we will be less “able” to afford the things we must do than we are today.
So, Mr. [politician’s name], I tell you that if you are not ready to advocate mathematically perfected economy™, the fact of what we cannot afford to do already demonstrates you are neglecting a key piece.
Promote mathematically perfected economy™ on the other hand, and we *will* succeed in everything we can and should succeed in, because only mathematically perfected economy™ can and will sustain our capabilities.
After all, we are faced with the artificial specter of world-wide monetary failure, while we *will* remain as capable and willing to render production from available resources as we were the day before the curtain fell — and you’re the very people dropping the curtain.
Except for profit making ventures or entities otherwise granted explicit permission to publish this copyright material, this article may be distributed or reprinted in whole only, from and including any quotes preceding its title, through and inclusive of the following permalink(s), by email or otherwise. Visitors may also download our entire directory of regular/main site articles from our downloads page: http://perfecteconomy.com/pg-free-pfmpe-downloads.html. If you want to save your country, we encourage personal distribution of this material to all conducive recipients of your personal address books. Of course, you may also send only the following permalink:
“Banking was conceived in iniquity, and born in sin. Bankers own the earth. Take it away from them, but leave them the power to create money, and with the flick of a pen, they will create enough money to buy it back again. Take this great power away from them, and all great fortunes like mine will disappear. And, they ought to disappear, for then this would be a better and happier world to live in. But if you want to continue to be the slaves of the bankers, and pay the cost of your own slavery, then let bankers continue to create money, and control credit.”
Sir Josiah Stamp, former president of the Bank of England
Until last spring, Iceland’s economy had the fourth-highest gross domestic product per-capita in the world. Unemployment rates were between zero and 1 percent, but forecasts for next spring are as high as 10 percent.
The country’s banks have failed and its currency has plummeted in the last month. Inflation in Iceland is at 16 percent and rising. The krona, a year ago, was at 65 to the dollar; now it’s 130. “No country has ever crashed as quickly and as badly in peacetime,” said Jon Danielsson, an economist with the London School of Economics.
SAVING ICELAND’S ECONOMY
Every “monetary” system subject to interest ultimately terminates itself under insoluble debt.
The problems of no country subject to interest therefore are unique. To arrest further multiplication of debt, you must eradicate interest. To restore an unaffected, natural monetary state, you must re-finance all debt without interest, crediting principal for all payments made by debtors (up to the remaining value of the subject property). All equity can be financed; and unlimited further funds are made available, not by monetizing existing assets/wealth, but by monetizing the new wealth by the natural relationship between true creditor (producer) and debtor.
Only countries which do so can pay off their debt and be without debt. As the Hazard Circular testifies, the brains and wealth of other nations will go to such nations, because there alone can brains, productivity, and wealth prosper.
Rather than suffering collapse under irreversible multiplication of debt, every country transitioning to mathematically perfected economy™ therefore will inherently have to devalue all currencies subject interest. Monetary failure is not engendered by representing the people; it is engendered only by preserving systems of exploitation, even as those systems impose failure.
In terms of the goals of solution, being President of Iceland is no different than being President of the United States:
Except for profit making ventures or entities otherwise granted explicit permission to publish this copyright material, this article may be distributed or reprinted in whole only, from and including any quotes preceding its title, through and inclusive of the following permalink(s), by email or otherwise. Visitors may also download our entire directory of regular/main site articles from our downloads page: http://perfecteconomy.com/pg-free-pfmpe-downloads.html. If you want to save your country, we encourage personal distribution of this material to all conducive recipients of your personal address books. Of course, you may also send only the following permalink:
What should concern us is who stands in the way of solution, and why.
mike montagne
WHY FOLLOWING BILL CLINTON WILL BE OBAMA’S ROAD TO FAILURE (TOO)
We have just witnessed a critical election in which none of the candidates proved they could solve critical monetary faults. We remain subject to an imposed monetary system which has only (already) engendered world wide monetary failure; and the inevitable cause of that failure and the next remain a form of currency which on the first hand requires us to maintain a vital circulation, and on the other requires us to do so by perpetually re-borrowing principal and interest as subsequent sums of debt, perpetually increased so much as periodic interest.
Because this process multiplies debt in proportion to the vital circulation, and because ever more of the vital circulation is inherently dedicated to servicing debt, versus sustaining the industry which is compelled to do so, the ultimate consequence of that process is catastrophic failure under terminal sums of debt.
Thomas Jefferson did not solve these issues, but he put the problem like this:
If the American people ever allow banks to issue their currency, first by inflation and then by deflation [by having to maintain a vital circulation by perpetuallyre-borrowing principal and interest as subsequent sums of debt, increased perpetually so much as periodic interest], the banks and [bank owned] corporations which will grow up around them will deprive the people of all property, until their children wake homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.
Thus, along the road to dispossession by artificial multiplication of debt into terminal debt, the sum of debt increases at an inherently escalating rate of ever greater sums of periodic interest on an ever greater sum of debt. And yet despite the ramifications of this imposed process; and despite the fact the Democrats established the so called Federal Reserve immediately on the heels of a 1912 party platform which explicitly promised not to create a central bank; essentially nonetheless, Barack Obama’s only considered course follows the model of Bill Clinton; and he is only hiring advocates and principal players of the very system which is the cause of the impending monetary failure. All the pieces falling into place therefore, are to preserve the ever more destructive system which has been imposed upon us.
The Clintons of course claim to have presided over what they tell us is the greatest industrial expansion of modern history.
But this claim is a lie. Starving for ways to replenish the circulatory deflation imposed by the debt which had been accumulated to Clinton’s terms in office, and with the public already rendered unable to afford sustaining a circulation itself, the false boom of Mr. Clinton’s claimed industrial expansion merely served as a temporary stop-gap to replenish the circulation.
How quickly we have forgotten that purported boom was a bust before it got out the gate. Company after company after company spent 90 percent of its revenue on celebrations and expensive cars for “key” executives. Not only are almost all of those companies gone, even by the time Mr. Clinton left office, few of them had made a penny of profit.
During the subsequent Bush regime, the circulation has been replenished by monumental borrowing, not just for war, but even for the oil you so much depend on.
All this while then indeed, debt has been multiplying at escalating rates toward inevitable failure, with no “representative” of the people advocating solution; and so, it will be against the further multiplication of the resultant, far greater sum of debt (already collapsing us), that Mr. Obama hopes to succeed.
The president-elect hopes to create millions of jobs. How are we going to sustain those jobs which we already cannot afford to sustain, saddled with all the further debt which will be incurred?
Even if we could sustain them for some while, further, perpetual, escalating multiplication of debt would soon swallow up any ostensible benefit.
He hopes to create those jobs by expediting technology we already have, to become energy independent. But the only real reason we cannot implement that technology is we are saddled with so much debt already.
So if our new President follows in Mr. Clinton’s footsteps, Mr. Obama can only succeed if we can afford that technology we already have, at considerable delay, and at the further cost to the public that short-sighted course condemns us to.
So how do we get there from here?
The answer has been here for 30 years; and in fact the powers that have been have only worked to keep it from you: mathematically perfected economy™ makes all these things possible immediately, and without cost, simply by eliminating the unearned takings which the people Mr. Obama is installing in his cabinet are so accustomed to.
Except for profit making ventures or entities otherwise granted explicit permission to publish this copyright material, this article may be distributed or reprinted in whole only, from and including any quotes preceding its title, through and inclusive of the following permalink(s), by email or otherwise. Visitors may also download our entire directory of regular/main site articles from our downloads page: http://perfecteconomy.com/pg-free-pfmpe-downloads.html. If you want to save your country, we encourage personal distribution of this material to all conducive recipients of your personal address books. Of course, you may also send only the following permalink:
As we compose our perceptions (as opposed to opinions), what we are concerned with, if we are to succeed, is not to arrive at a mere opinion, but to refine our understanding into veritable engineering. Principles are the building blocks of engineering; and, as we say, real (true, incontrovertible) principles are only abandoned; they cannot be compromised, because that is to destroy the principle itself. This idea is key to wielding the issues before us in a way in which we will succeed.
mike montagne
WHY NOT NATIONALIZE THE PRIVATE FEDERAL RESERVE?
For many years, many people have asked, why not nationalize the so called Federal Reserve?
The principle fault of this notion is that nationalizing the pretended public institution would not eradicate its principal fault. That is, a currency subject to interest will still multiply debt into terminal debt.
Nationalization further carries with it a connotation akin to socialism. Even as the central banks of the world have never produced anything, and therefore have earned no wealth, nationalization (wrongly or rightly) implies confiscation of duly earned wealth, and subsequent ownership of vital processes by the state.
In mathematically perfected economy?, there is no such ownership; there is only the obligation of the state to maintain consistent accounts as is now performed by private banks. No currency is ever owned by the state via mathematically perfected economy™; on the contrary, the circulation is merely retired, and passes out of existence, when the obligations of debtors are fulfilled. Even as it might accumulate reservoirs of taxation (extrinsic to the economy), the state holds the same position as each individual in mathematically perfected economy™; it, like the individual, can only own currency it effectively earns (unless we allow the state to confiscate wealth it does not deserve, which is not a function of the economy).
Effectively, converse to the obfuscated concept of “privatization” of the currency by a private central bank pretending to be a federal institution, mathematically perfected economy? is a privatization of the currency in which the currency is comprised of the very promises to pay of each debtor. In other words, mathematically perfected economy? merely replicates the natural situation, in which debtors issue promises to pay to their actual creditors, who are the producers of the subject wealth.
Usury on the other hand is an usurpation of this arrangement, wherein a “central bank” pretends to be the creditor, issuing the promises to pay of all debtors, to the real creditors (producers), at virtually no cost to itself, and yet charging us interest, as if the promises represented earned wealth of the central bank. By this obfuscation that purported risk justifies interest, we are forced in turn to maintain a vital circulation by perpetually re-borrowing principal and interest as subsequent sums of debt, with the sum of debt thus perpetually increased by periodic interest, in proportion to our means, until the sum of debt is terminal.
As none of the meager, actual apparatus of the private Federal Reserve therefore is implemented in an eventual, just economy, there is no need whatever to take over its assets, except to restore to the people what has been taken from them via usurpation, and this means of exploitation.
So this is the only reason to nationalize the private Federal Reserve; and the great danger of the coarse idea of simply nationalizing these many private entities is, that this preserves an inherently terminal process which is only solved by mathematically perfected economy™.
We only need to do two things to solve all the issues of the imposed, pretended monetary systems; and these are 1) to eradicate interest, and 2) to schedule payment of debt by the rate of consumption/depreciation of the related property.
Except for profit making ventures or entities otherwise granted explicit permission to publish this copyright material, this article may be distributed or reprinted in whole only, from and including any quotes preceding its title, through and inclusive of the following permalink(s), by email or otherwise. Visitors may also download our entire directory of regular/main site articles from our downloads page: http://perfecteconomy.com/pg-free-pfmpe-downloads.html. If you want to save your country, we encourage personal distribution of this material to all conducive recipients of your personal address books. Of course, you may also send only the following permalink:
Those who claim regulation is the issue have no leg to stand on.
There is of course no reasonable dream of regulating away the iniquities of inherently multiplying debt, without eradicating the very thing we might regulate. So long as the primary process takes unearned profit, terminal culmination of the process is ensured by the fact that either by greater increments or by lesser, irreversible multiplication of debt in proportion to the obligated circulation eventually exceeds the finite potential of the circulation to service debt.
mike montagne
BASIC EFFECT OF MATHEMATICALLY PERFECTED ECONOMY™ ON STOCK MARKETS
One of the facades we are forced to strive against is the unqualifiable proposition that money multiplies wealth.
By drawing the masses to the superficial allure of this false appeal, in fact their wealth is thus exposed to the most omnipotent means of exploitation, to which it is eventually lost. Accepting the lie even as a principle, and pitted against the escalated exploitation of a pretended monetary system which inherently multiplies debt at escalating rates, so the masses in turn engage in exploiting each other at escalating rates, for it is impractical either to out-exploit or so otherwise defeat privatization of pretended monetary systems, which of course are imposed for the very purpose of multiplying debt in proportion to the circulation, to our ever greater disadvantage, and ultimate ruin.
But so, for the escalation of the underlying, omnipotent process (served first), the people are compelled to compete against a greater, perpetually escalating thing which can only defeat them, however much they might exploit each other.
Against a process which can only multiply debt in proportion to the circulation, and which can only leave ever less of the circulation to sustain the industry which is obligated to service a multiplication of debt ever farther beyond our means or even potential means, a vain people thus hope to exploit themselves, to ostensibly prosper by actually making themselves a drain on prosperity. Yet the greatest drain, and the drain which will be served first and to the dispossession of all, is the privatization of the currency.
The religion of a duped people thus not only becomes exploitation, but a perpetual escalation of exploitation. Committed to this process, they become in fact committed to produce nothing; and so, to an ever greater degree, their escalated exploitation is pitted against itself, competing for proportionately less, and eventually competing then even the nothing which can eventually survive the escalating multiplication of debt, which from the beginning, they wrongly presumed to comprise a worthy foundation for justice.
In the zeal they must engage in so long as they hold to their first mistake, thus at least some of them presume to take from all the rest, to the greatest degrees possible, by whatever advantages serve no more than exploitation. In the only possible manifestation of this zeal then, the principle of free enterprise itself is destroyed, as greater portions of finite tokens of wealth are distributed not to real industry, but to those who can take the fruit of our doings by whatever means they can simply devise.
From the very beginning then, respect for law and principle fell by the wayside, while in the end, the inevitable failure of the omnipotent process which multiplies debt upon the whole of us poses the simple, fundamental question still, “Do we survive by exploitation, or do we survive by production — and thus, only by a system which sustains and rightly distributes all the production we are capable of?”
These of course are opposing propositions; and so, as a consequence of the first, purposed obfuscation, we dispose ourselves to failure.
In all the ineptitude which is built upon the first wrong principle, the dupes of this facade further presume wrongly, that the survival of the arenas of exploitation is vital to their survival. They believe wrongly in other words, only so far as they are committed to participate in this exploitation, that the survival of their exploitation is vital to perpetuation. When “the markets” prosper; they prosper; and when “the markets” tumble, they too fall from Humpty Dumpty’s wall.
We cannot have that, they say: the arenas of predation must be preserved from their collapse; and we must preserve against the same collapse, the institutions which impose a currency upon us which can only multiply debt into collapse.
Thus, nothing is more self destructive than the simple lie that wealth can be multiplied, for it engenders all the false beliefs which turn from the underlying, omnipotent fact that a form of currency which can only multiply debt into terminal debt will prevail over all the less monumental ways we can exploit each other to death.
The “economies” of the world are not failing because they are just, or right. They are not dispossessing the people of their own production because they serve the people. Governments across the world are not evading debate of mathematically perfected economy™ because those governments represent the people. All this exists because we tolerate privatization of the currency for the very purpose of exploitation, and because the process of exploitation irreversibly multiplies debt in proportion to vital circulations, until it imposes terminal sums of debt.
The process and the usurpations which serve it therefore are terminal; and so it would be the greatest disgrace to intelligent, truly self ruling publics, that while they remain capable and willing as ever to render production from available resources, “the world’s” “economies” fail.
In the spirit of the first lie, we call all this “finance,” and “investment.” But it is neither. “Finance” is to impose a form of currency which can only impose disposition all along the short way to terminal debt. “Investment” is a mere gambling arena, which reflects not the health of the subject industry, but its very destruction, and the destruction of those who must depend on sustainable industry.
In all this purposed confusion, there are an incredible many who oppose even discussing the mathematic perfection of economy, because of course they anticipate it would be the end of their wrong way. Merely hoping, to the deepest stages of collapse even, to evade the inevitable consequences of unassented “monetary systems” which can only impose collapse, they want to preserve exploitation to the demise of all, only because they intend only to depend on exploitation.
The idea of preserving both the underlying system of exploitation by the imposed subversion of the currency, and the subservient systems of exploitation which remain subject to that, appeals to them — particularly as they hope not to pay the far greater, further costs of preserving each, but to pass those costs on to their very progeny.
So they resist solution, even ambitiously; and they do so even to their own destruction.
As we can only truly understand from all this however, the so-called markets must collapse when the imposed currency eventually generates sums of debt which we can no longer afford to service. Thus by taking from the true producers, on the backs of whom the sum of debt is serviced, the advocates of exploitation seal our fate.
Many of us nonetheless have our fates cast to the subject arenas insofar as retirement funds, insurance, and shares in company stock are concerned; and a general tendency is to presume here too that mathematically perfected economy™ would destroy the falsely inflated values of these things, because mathematically perfected economy™ provides alternate ways of funding which make the traditional corporation in fact a far less efficient or competitive way of “finance,” because dividends perpetually inflate the costs of production, and this cost is eliminated by mathematically perfected economy™.
It is true that mathematically perfected economy™ eliminates those perpetual costs while providing unlimited capacities to finance all the industry we are capable of.
But inasmuch as the survival of the markets of exploitation is concerned, the tremendous liquidity which mathematically perfected economy™ would immediately make available merely from re-financing existent debt without interest (under present, limited industry and income), would sustain “the markets” far better than a currency which can only engender near term, terminal debt.
So in fact, absolutely nothing can save us from present losses in these areas of concern as mathematically perfected economy™.
Moreover, because a transition to mathematically perfected economy™ costs us nothing, and can be accomplished immediately, it is the only just course, which avoids imposing our ineptitude upon eternity.
Except for profit making ventures or entities otherwise granted explicit permission to publish this copyright material, this article may be distributed or reprinted in whole only, from and including any quotes preceding its title, through and inclusive of the following permalink, by email or otherwise. Visitors may also download our entire directory of regular/main site articles from our downloads page: http://perfecteconomy.com/pg-free-pfmpe-downloads.html. If you want to save your country, we encourage personal distribution of this material to all conducive recipients of your personal address books. Of course, you may also send only the following permalink:
I’m neither a mathematician nor an economist, two disciplines in which I fared rather poorly, to be truthful, but I am good enough with logic and number to see that you’re quite brilliant at economic theory and that you’re on to something big. Very big. I wouldn’t let the “theft” of some of your foundation work bother you; it’s a big kudo to you that they’ve borrowed from you, though their conclusions or motivations be false.
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 11 APPEAL TO OBAMA TRANSITION TEAM
Tuesday, November 11 2008, 1:12 PM
Dear Mr. Obama,
I write yet again, requiring to know why still we have no reply to our several further propositions of mathematically perfected economy™.
Why have I not heard from your campaign or transition team?
Fifty-thousand times a month people are reading on our web pages a prescription for absolute solution. If you intend to represent us, we expect you to answer to the proposition of mathematically perfected economy — not evade it:
Except for profit making ventures or entities otherwise granted explicit permission to publish this copyright material, this article may be distributed or reprinted in whole only, from and including any quotes preceding its title, through and inclusive of the following permalink, by email or otherwise. Visitors may also download our entire directory of regular/main site articles from our downloads page: http://perfecteconomy.com/pg-free-pfmpe-downloads.html. If you want to save your country, we encourage personal distribution of this material to all conducive recipients of your personal address books. Of course, you may also send only the following permalink:
RELATED MATERIAL
del.icio.us
FaceBook
NewsVine
reddit
&bodytext=PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy™&media=news&topic=politics&thumbnails=http://perfecteconomy.com/img-banner-pfmpe-bar.jpg)
