SAVING ICELAND’S ECONOMY

Every “monetary” system subject to interest ultimately terminates itself under insoluble debt.

The problems of no country subject to interest therefore are unique. To arrest further multiplication of debt, you must eradicate interest. To restore an unaffected, natural monetary state, you must re-finance all debt without interest, crediting principal for all payments made by debtors (up to the remaining value of the subject property). All equity can be financed; and unlimited further funds are made available, not by monetizing existing assets/wealth, but by monetizing the new wealth by the natural relationship between true creditor (producer) and debtor.

Only countries which do so can pay off their debt and be without debt. As the Hazard Circular testifies, the brains and wealth of other nations will go to such nations, because there alone can brains, productivity, and wealth prosper.

Rather than suffering collapse under irreversible multiplication of debt, every country transitioning to mathematically perfected economy™ therefore will inherently have to devalue all currencies subject interest. Monetary failure is not engendered by representing the people; it is engendered only by preserving systems of exploitation, even as those systems impose failure.

In terms of the goals of solution, being President of Iceland is no different than being President of the United States:

[ KEY ]  IF I WERE PRESIDENT — HOW TO ARREST WORLD WIDE MONETARY COLLAPSE IN A DAY

RELATED MATERIAL

1. Iceland’s economy crashes
2. [ KEY ]  IF I WERE PRESIDENT — HOW TO ARREST WORLD WIDE MONETARY COLLAPSE IN A DAY
3. SYNOPSIS — MATHEMATICALLY PERFECTED ECONOMY™ REDUCED TO ITS BAREST THREAD
4. PROBABILITY AND TIMELINE FOR WORLD-WIDE ECONOMIC COLLAPSE AS A CONSEQUENCE OF INTEREST
5. EVALUATION OF JEFFERSON’S OPINION ON THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF A NATIONAL BANK

“To find the players in all the corruption of the world, ‘Follow the money.’ To find the captains of world corruption, follow the money all the way.”

mike montagne — founder, PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy™, author/engineer of mathematically perfected economy™ (1979)

© COPYRIGHT 2008, by mike montagne and PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy™.

Except for profit making ventures or entities otherwise granted explicit permission to publish this copyright material, this article may be distributed or reprinted in whole only, from and including any quotes preceding its title, through and inclusive of the following permalink(s), by email or otherwise. Visitors may also download our entire directory of regular/main site articles from our downloads page: http://perfecteconomy.com/pg-free-pfmpe-downloads.html. If you want to save your country, we encourage personal distribution of this material to all conducive recipients of your personal address books. Of course, you may also send only the following permalink:

http://perfecteconomy.com/wp/2008/11/12/saving-icelands-economy/

DISCUSS THIS ARTICLE IN THE PFMPE™ FORUM:

http://www.perfecteconomy.com/f/viewtopic.php?f=45&t=152

[END PERMALINK(S)]

WHY FOLLOWING BILL CLINTON WILL BE OBAMA’S ROAD TO FAILURE (TOO)

We have just witnessed a critical election in which none of the candidates proved they could solve critical monetary faults. We remain subject to an imposed monetary system which has only (already) engendered world wide monetary failure; and the inevitable cause of that failure and the next remain a form of currency which on the first hand requires us to maintain a vital circulation, and on the other requires us to do so by perpetually re-borrowing principal and interest as subsequent sums of debt, perpetually increased so much as periodic interest.

Because this process multiplies debt in proportion to the vital circulation, and because ever more of the vital circulation is inherently dedicated to servicing debt, versus sustaining the industry which is compelled to do so, the ultimate consequence of that process is catastrophic failure under terminal sums of debt.

Thomas Jefferson did not solve these issues, but he put the problem like this:

Thus, along the road to dispossession by artificial multiplication of debt into terminal debt, the sum of debt increases at an inherently escalating rate of ever greater sums of periodic interest on an ever greater sum of debt. And yet despite the ramifications of this imposed process; and despite the fact the Democrats established the so called Federal Reserve immediately on the heels of a 1912 party platform which explicitly promised not to create a central bank; essentially nonetheless, Barack Obama’s only considered course follows the model of Bill Clinton; and he is only hiring advocates and principal players of the very system which is the cause of the impending monetary failure. All the pieces falling into place therefore, are to preserve the ever more destructive system which has been imposed upon us.

The Clintons of course claim to have presided over what they tell us is the greatest industrial expansion of modern history.

But this claim is a lie. Starving for ways to replenish the circulatory deflation imposed by the debt which had been accumulated to Clinton’s terms in office, and with the public already rendered unable to afford sustaining a circulation itself, the false boom of Mr. Clinton’s claimed industrial expansion merely served as a temporary stop-gap to replenish the circulation.

How quickly we have forgotten that purported boom was a bust before it got out the gate. Company after company after company spent 90 percent of its revenue on celebrations and expensive cars for “key” executives. Not only are almost all of those companies gone, even by the time Mr. Clinton left office, few of them had made a penny of profit.

During the subsequent Bush regime, the circulation has been replenished by monumental borrowing, not just for war, but even for the oil you so much depend on.

All this while then indeed, debt has been multiplying at escalating rates toward inevitable failure, with no “representative” of the people advocating solution; and so, it will be against the further multiplication of the resultant, far greater sum of debt (already collapsing us), that Mr. Obama hopes to succeed.

The president-elect hopes to create millions of jobs. How are we going to sustain those jobs which we already cannot afford to sustain, saddled with all the further debt which will be incurred?

Even if we could sustain them for some while, further, perpetual, escalating multiplication of debt would soon swallow up any ostensible benefit.

He hopes to create those jobs by expediting technology we already have, to become energy independent. But the only real reason we cannot implement that technology is we are saddled with so much debt already.

So if our new President follows in Mr. Clinton’s footsteps, Mr. Obama can only succeed if we can afford that technology we already have, at considerable delay, and at the further cost to the public that short-sighted course condemns us to.

So how do we get there from here?

The answer has been here for 30 years; and in fact the powers that have been have only worked to keep it from you: mathematically perfected economy™ makes all these things possible immediately, and without cost, simply by eliminating the unearned takings which the people Mr. Obama is installing in his cabinet are so accustomed to.

RELATED MATERIAL

1. [ KEY ]  IF I WERE PRESIDENT — HOW TO ARREST WORLD WIDE MONETARY COLLAPSE IN A DAY
2. SYNOPSIS — MATHEMATICALLY PERFECTED ECONOMY™ REDUCED TO ITS BAREST THREAD
3. PROBABILITY AND TIMELINE FOR WORLD-WIDE ECONOMIC COLLAPSE AS A CONSEQUENCE OF INTEREST
4. EVALUATION OF JEFFERSON’S OPINION ON THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF A NATIONAL BANK

“To find the players in all the corruption of the world, ‘Follow the money.’ To find the captains of world corruption, follow the money all the way.”

mike montagne — founder, PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy™, author/engineer of mathematically perfected economy™ (1979)

© COPYRIGHT 2008, by mike montagne and PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy™.

Except for profit making ventures or entities otherwise granted explicit permission to publish this copyright material, this article may be distributed or reprinted in whole only, from and including any quotes preceding its title, through and inclusive of the following permalink(s), by email or otherwise. Visitors may also download our entire directory of regular/main site articles from our downloads page: http://perfecteconomy.com/pg-free-pfmpe-downloads.html. If you want to save your country, we encourage personal distribution of this material to all conducive recipients of your personal address books. Of course, you may also send only the following permalink:

http://perfecteconomy.com/wp/2008/11/12/why-following-bill-clinton-will-be-obamas-road-to-failure-too/

DISCUSS THIS ARTICLE IN THE PFMPE™ FORUM:

http://www.perfecteconomy.com/f/viewtopic.php?f=90&t=151

[END PERMALINK(S)]

WHY NOT NATIONALIZE THE PRIVATE FEDERAL RESERVE?

For many years, many people have asked, why not nationalize the so called Federal Reserve?

The principle fault of this notion is that nationalizing the pretended public institution would not eradicate its principal fault. That is, a currency subject to interest will still multiply debt into terminal debt.

Nationalization further carries with it a connotation akin to socialism. Even as the central banks of the world have never produced anything, and therefore have earned no wealth, nationalization (wrongly or rightly) implies confiscation of duly earned wealth, and subsequent ownership of vital processes by the state.

In mathematically perfected economy?, there is no such ownership; there is only the obligation of the state to maintain consistent accounts as is now performed by private banks. No currency is ever owned by the state via mathematically perfected economy™; on the contrary, the circulation is merely retired, and passes out of existence, when the obligations of debtors are fulfilled. Even as it might accumulate reservoirs of taxation (extrinsic to the economy), the state holds the same position as each individual in mathematically perfected economy™; it, like the individual, can only own currency it effectively earns (unless we allow the state to confiscate wealth it does not deserve, which is not a function of the economy).

Effectively, converse to the obfuscated concept of “privatization” of the currency by a private central bank pretending to be a federal institution, mathematically perfected economy? is a privatization of the currency in which the currency is comprised of the very promises to pay of each debtor. In other words, mathematically perfected economy? merely replicates the natural situation, in which debtors issue promises to pay to their actual creditors, who are the producers of the subject wealth.

Usury on the other hand is an usurpation of this arrangement, wherein a “central bank” pretends to be the creditor, issuing the promises to pay of all debtors, to the real creditors (producers), at virtually no cost to itself, and yet charging us interest, as if the promises represented earned wealth of the central bank. By this obfuscation that purported risk justifies interest, we are forced in turn to maintain a vital circulation by perpetually re-borrowing principal and interest as subsequent sums of debt, with the sum of debt thus perpetually increased by periodic interest, in proportion to our means, until the sum of debt is terminal.

As none of the meager, actual apparatus of the private Federal Reserve therefore is implemented in an eventual, just economy, there is no need whatever to take over its assets, except to restore to the people what has been taken from them via usurpation, and this means of exploitation.

So this is the only reason to nationalize the private Federal Reserve; and the great danger of the coarse idea of simply nationalizing these many private entities is, that this preserves an inherently terminal process which is only solved by mathematically perfected economy™.

We only need to do two things to solve all the issues of the imposed, pretended monetary systems; and these are 1) to eradicate interest, and 2) to schedule payment of debt by the rate of consumption/depreciation of the related property.

RELATED MATERIAL

1. SYNOPSIS — MATHEMATICALLY PERFECTED ECONOMY™ REDUCED TO ITS BAREST THREAD
2. [ KEY ]  IF I WERE PRESIDENT — HOW TO ARREST WORLD WIDE MONETARY COLLAPSE IN A DAY
3. PROBABILITY AND TIMELINE FOR WORLD-WIDE ECONOMIC COLLAPSE AS A CONSEQUENCE OF INTEREST
4. EVALUATION OF JEFFERSON’S OPINION ON THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF A NATIONAL BANK

“To find the players in all the corruption of the world, ‘Follow the money.’ To find the captains of world corruption, follow the money all the way.”

mike montagne — founder, PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy™, author/engineer of mathematically perfected economy™ (1979)

© COPYRIGHT 2008, by mike montagne and PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy™.

Except for profit making ventures or entities otherwise granted explicit permission to publish this copyright material, this article may be distributed or reprinted in whole only, from and including any quotes preceding its title, through and inclusive of the following permalink(s), by email or otherwise. Visitors may also download our entire directory of regular/main site articles from our downloads page: http://perfecteconomy.com/pg-free-pfmpe-downloads.html. If you want to save your country, we encourage personal distribution of this material to all conducive recipients of your personal address books. Of course, you may also send only the following permalink:

http://perfecteconomy.com/wp/2008/11/12/why-not-nationalize-the-private-federal-reserve/

DISCUSS THIS ARTICLE IN THE PFMPE™ FORUM:

http://www.perfecteconomy.com/f/viewtopic.php?f=89&t=150

[END PERMALINK(S)]

TODAY’S LETTER TO LOU DOBBS

Lou,

Your viewers have many times over many years insisted I contact you. I have before. I suppose I may again.

You have my number. Here’s just a few pages you should see:

http://perfecteconomy.com/pg-synopsis.html

http://perfecteconomy.com/pg-if-i-were-president.html

http://perfecteconomy.com/pg-probability-of-worldwide-economic-collapse.html

http://perfecteconomy.com/pg-evaluation-of-jeffersons-opinion-on-the-constitutionality-of-a-national-bank.html

http://perfecteconomy.com/pg-parable-of-perfect-economy.html

In case you might presume mathematically perfected economy is fringe thinking, its principles have never been refuted (see many articles regarding tries):

http://perfecteconomy.com/pg-william-b-ryan-ad-hominems-disprove-mpe.html

http://perfecteconomy.com/pg-invalidation-of-griffin-creature-from-jekyll-island.html

We are by far the most popular monetary reform site on the web, and the original source of the most important research.

Please give MPE a look, Lou. People seem to think you are a man who would.

Regards,

mike montagne, founder PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy™

Email Lou Dobbs to ask him to address mathematically perfected economy™:

http://www.cnn.com/feedback/forms/form5.html?9

RELATED MATERIAL

1. LOU DOBBS’ CONTACT FORM
2. SYNOPSIS — MATHEMATICALLY PERFECTED ECONOMY™ REDUCED TO ITS BAREST THREAD
3. [ KEY ]  IF I WERE PRESIDENT — HOW TO ARREST WORLD WIDE MONETARY COLLAPSE IN A DAY
4. PROBABILITY AND TIMELINE FOR WORLD-WIDE ECONOMIC COLLAPSE AS A CONSEQUENCE OF INTEREST
5. EVALUATION OF JEFFERSON’S OPINION ON THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF A NATIONAL BANK

“To find the players in all the corruption of the world, ‘Follow the money.’ To find the captains of world corruption, follow the money all the way.”

mike montagne — founder, PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy™, author/engineer of mathematically perfected economy™ (1979)

© COPYRIGHT 2008, by mike montagne and PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy™.

Except for profit making ventures or entities otherwise granted explicit permission to publish this copyright material, this article may be distributed or reprinted in whole only, from and including any quotes preceding its title, through and inclusive of the following permalink, by email or otherwise. Visitors may also download our entire directory of regular/main site articles from our downloads page: http://perfecteconomy.com/pg-free-pfmpe-downloads.html. If you want to save your country, we encourage personal distribution of this material to all conducive recipients of your personal address books. Of course, you may also send only the following permalink:

http://perfecteconomy.com/wp/2008/11/12/todays-letter-to-lou-dobbs/ [END PERMALINK]

BASIC EFFECT OF MATHEMATICALLY PERFECTED ECONOMY™ ON STOCK MARKETS

One of the facades we are forced to strive against is the unqualifiable proposition that money multiplies wealth.

By drawing the masses to the superficial allure of this false appeal, in fact their wealth is thus exposed to the most omnipotent means of exploitation, to which it is eventually lost. Accepting the lie even as a principle, and pitted against the escalated exploitation of a pretended monetary system which inherently multiplies debt at escalating rates, so the masses in turn engage in exploiting each other at escalating rates, for it is impractical either to out-exploit or so otherwise defeat privatization of pretended monetary systems, which of course are imposed for the very purpose of multiplying debt in proportion to the circulation, to our ever greater disadvantage, and ultimate ruin.

But so, for the escalation of the underlying, omnipotent process (served first), the people are compelled to compete against a greater, perpetually escalating thing which can only defeat them, however much they might exploit each other.

Against a process which can only multiply debt in proportion to the circulation, and which can only leave ever less of the circulation to sustain the industry which is obligated to service a multiplication of debt ever farther beyond our means or even potential means, a vain people thus hope to exploit themselves, to ostensibly prosper by actually making themselves a drain on prosperity. Yet the greatest drain, and the drain which will be served first and to the dispossession of all, is the privatization of the currency.

The religion of a duped people thus not only becomes exploitation, but a perpetual escalation of exploitation. Committed to this process, they become in fact committed to produce nothing; and so, to an ever greater degree, their escalated exploitation is pitted against itself, competing for proportionately less, and eventually competing then even the nothing which can eventually survive the escalating multiplication of debt, which from the beginning, they wrongly presumed to comprise a worthy foundation for justice.

In the zeal they must engage in so long as they hold to their first mistake, thus at least some of them presume to take from all the rest, to the greatest degrees possible, by whatever advantages serve no more than exploitation. In the only possible manifestation of this zeal then, the principle of free enterprise itself is destroyed, as greater portions of finite tokens of wealth are distributed not to real industry, but to those who can take the fruit of our doings by whatever means they can simply devise.

From the very beginning then, respect for law and principle fell by the wayside, while in the end, the inevitable failure of the omnipotent process which multiplies debt upon the whole of us poses the simple, fundamental question still, “Do we survive by exploitation, or do we survive by production — and thus, only by a system which sustains and rightly distributes all the production we are capable of?”

These of course are opposing propositions; and so, as a consequence of the first, purposed obfuscation, we dispose ourselves to failure.

In all the ineptitude which is built upon the first wrong principle, the dupes of this facade further presume wrongly, that the survival of the arenas of exploitation is vital to their survival. They believe wrongly in other words, only so far as they are committed to participate in this exploitation, that the survival of their exploitation is vital to perpetuation. When “the markets” prosper; they prosper; and when “the markets” tumble, they too fall from Humpty Dumpty’s wall.

We cannot have that, they say: the arenas of predation must be preserved from their collapse; and we must preserve against the same collapse, the institutions which impose a currency upon us which can only multiply debt into collapse.

Thus, nothing is more self destructive than the simple lie that wealth can be multiplied, for it engenders all the false beliefs which turn from the underlying, omnipotent fact that a form of currency which can only multiply debt into terminal debt will prevail over all the less monumental ways we can exploit each other to death.

The “economies” of the world are not failing because they are just, or right. They are not dispossessing the people of their own production because they serve the people. Governments across the world are not evading debate of mathematically perfected economy™ because those governments represent the people. All this exists because we tolerate privatization of the currency for the very purpose of exploitation, and because the process of exploitation irreversibly multiplies debt in proportion to vital circulations, until it imposes terminal sums of debt.

The process and the usurpations which serve it therefore are terminal; and so it would be the greatest disgrace to intelligent, truly self ruling publics, that while they remain capable and willing as ever to render production from available resources, “the world’s” “economies” fail.

In the spirit of the first lie, we call all this “finance,” and “investment.” But it is neither. “Finance” is to impose a form of currency which can only impose disposition all along the short way to terminal debt. “Investment” is a mere gambling arena, which reflects not the health of the subject industry, but its very destruction, and the destruction of those who must depend on sustainable industry.

In all this purposed confusion, there are an incredible many who oppose even discussing the mathematic perfection of economy, because of course they anticipate it would be the end of their wrong way. Merely hoping, to the deepest stages of collapse even, to evade the inevitable consequences of unassented “monetary systems” which can only impose collapse, they want to preserve exploitation to the demise of all, only because they intend only to depend on exploitation.

The idea of preserving both the underlying system of exploitation by the imposed subversion of the currency, and the subservient systems of exploitation which remain subject to that, appeals to them — particularly as they hope not to pay the far greater, further costs of preserving each, but to pass those costs on to their very progeny.

So they resist solution, even ambitiously; and they do so even to their own destruction.

As we can only truly understand from all this however, the so-called markets must collapse when the imposed currency eventually generates sums of debt which we can no longer afford to service. Thus by taking from the true producers, on the backs of whom the sum of debt is serviced, the advocates of exploitation seal our fate.

Many of us nonetheless have our fates cast to the subject arenas insofar as retirement funds, insurance, and shares in company stock are concerned; and a general tendency is to presume here too that mathematically perfected economy™ would destroy the falsely inflated values of these things, because mathematically perfected economy™ provides alternate ways of funding which make the traditional corporation in fact a far less efficient or competitive way of “finance,” because dividends perpetually inflate the costs of production, and this cost is eliminated by mathematically perfected economy™.

It is true that mathematically perfected economy™ eliminates those perpetual costs while providing unlimited capacities to finance all the industry we are capable of.

But inasmuch as the survival of the markets of exploitation is concerned, the tremendous liquidity which mathematically perfected economy™ would immediately make available merely from re-financing existent debt without interest (under present, limited industry and income), would sustain “the markets” far better than a currency which can only engender near term, terminal debt.

So in fact, absolutely nothing can save us from present losses in these areas of concern as mathematically perfected economy™.

Moreover, because a transition to mathematically perfected economy™ costs us nothing, and can be accomplished immediately, it is the only just course, which avoids imposing our ineptitude upon eternity.

RELATED MATERIAL

1. SYNOPSIS — MATHEMATICALLY PERFECTED ECONOMY™ REDUCED TO ITS BAREST THREAD
2. [ KEY ]  IF I WERE PRESIDENT — HOW TO ARREST WORLD WIDE MONETARY COLLAPSE IN A DAY
3. PROBABILITY AND TIMELINE FOR WORLD-WIDE ECONOMIC COLLAPSE AS A CONSEQUENCE OF INTEREST
4. EVALUATION OF JEFFERSON’S OPINION ON THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF A NATIONAL BANK

“To find the players in all the corruption of the world, ‘Follow the money.’ To find the captains of world corruption, follow the money all the way.”

mike montagne — founder, PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy™, author/engineer of mathematically perfected economy™ (1979)

© COPYRIGHT 2008, by mike montagne and PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy™.

Except for profit making ventures or entities otherwise granted explicit permission to publish this copyright material, this article may be distributed or reprinted in whole only, from and including any quotes preceding its title, through and inclusive of the following permalink, by email or otherwise. Visitors may also download our entire directory of regular/main site articles from our downloads page: http://perfecteconomy.com/pg-free-pfmpe-downloads.html. If you want to save your country, we encourage personal distribution of this material to all conducive recipients of your personal address books. Of course, you may also send only the following permalink:

http://perfecteconomy.com/wp/2008/11/12/basic-effect-of-mathematically-perfected-economy-on-stock-markets/ [END PERMALINK]

DISCUSS THIS ARTICLE IN THE PFMPE™ FORUM:

http://www.perfecteconomy.com/f/viewtopic.php?f=88&t=149

TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 11 APPEAL TO OBAMA TRANSITION TEAM

Tuesday, November 11 2008, 1:12 PM

Dear Mr. Obama,

I write yet again, requiring to know why still we have no reply to our several further propositions of mathematically perfected economy™.

Why have I not heard from your campaign or transition team?

Fifty-thousand times a month people are reading on our web pages a prescription for absolute solution. If you intend to represent us, we expect you to answer to the proposition of mathematically perfected economy — not evade it:

http://www.perfecteconomy.com/pg-synopsis.html

http://www.perfecteconomy.com/pg-if-i-were-president.html

mike montagne

Posted to both submission forms at the following URLs. Visit Obama’s ChangeGov site and reinforce this initiative:

http://www.change.gov/page/s/yourvision

http://www.change.gov/page/s/yourstory

RELATED MATERIAL

1. http://www.change.gov/page/s/yourvision
2. http://www.change.gov/page/s/yourstory
3. SYNOPSIS — MATHEMATICALLY PERFECTED ECONOMY™ REDUCED TO ITS BAREST THREAD
4. [ KEY ]  IF I WERE PRESIDENT — HOW TO ARREST WORLD WIDE MONETARY COLLAPSE IN A DAY
5. PROBABILITY AND TIMELINE FOR WORLD-WIDE ECONOMIC COLLAPSE AS A CONSEQUENCE OF INTEREST
6. EVALUATION OF JEFFERSON’S OPINION ON THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF A NATIONAL BANK

“To find the players in all the corruption of the world, ‘Follow the money.’ To find the captains of world corruption, follow the money all the way.”

mike montagne — founder, PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy™, author/engineer of mathematically perfected economy™ (1979)

© COPYRIGHT 2008, by mike montagne and PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy™.

Except for profit making ventures or entities otherwise granted explicit permission to publish this copyright material, this article may be distributed or reprinted in whole only, from and including any quotes preceding its title, through and inclusive of the following permalink, by email or otherwise. Visitors may also download our entire directory of regular/main site articles from our downloads page: http://perfecteconomy.com/pg-free-pfmpe-downloads.html. If you want to save your country, we encourage personal distribution of this material to all conducive recipients of your personal address books. Of course, you may also send only the following permalink:

http://perfecteconomy.com/wp/2008/11/11/tuesday-november-11-appeal-to-obama-transition-team/ [END PERMALINK]

EMAIL EXCHANGE WITH ANDREW GRAZIANO REGARDING SOLUTION

I try to answer as many good questions or thoughts as I can. Members of my private list so much appreciated yesterday’s exchange between Andrew G. and myself that I was asked to publish it to the blog.

These are simple things to understand once you get your brain around the simple concepts of mathematically perfected economy™. We all are constantly refining our perceptions of realities; and the present material is as much as thinking out loud.

As we compose our perceptions (as opposed to opinions), what we are concerned with, if we are to succeed, is not to arrive at a mere opinion, but to refine our understanding into veritable engineering. Principles are the building blocks of engineering; and, as we say, real (true, incontrovertible) principles are only abandoned; they cannot be compromised, because that is to destroy the principle itself. This idea is key to wielding the issues before us in a way in which we will succeed.

Where then do we get confused in reacting to all the alternate opinions which are proposed?

The first thing to do is to question whether they observe the vital principles. After all, if an alternate proposition observes principles which ascertain a fact of singular solution, then there would be no alternate proposition — the observation arrives yet again, by whatever route, at the singular possible solution.

So, we ourselves become confused when, to whatever least degree even, we leave the principle. I say this only because if I were not here, that’s how we would find our way.

EXAMPLE EXCHANGE REGARDING THE FINE POINTS OF SOLUTION

PFMPE™ responses inserted as in original emails:

Andrew,

We will be helped by expansion; and I’m just responding in these few paragraphs to your one point. But let’s consider all the ramifications of how we expand, etc.:

Existent debt will continue to multiply debt in proportion to the circulation; so, unless we re-finance all debt under MPE, whatever further growth we engender by artificial help against this process (which expression itself tells you we need to solve the cause), the artificially helped growth will fail just as Clinton’s “greatest industrial expansion in modern history” failed.

1. So, we must re-finance all debt under MPE to sustain the benefit we are attempting to achieve.

2. We don’t need any such bailout under MPE, because MPE will just fund all the new small business as it needs funding.

But yes, then we can just let the “big banks” fail as the natural consequence of their process.

I think you might have a comma or two out of place in the last number.

With *purposed* federal and “federal reserve” distortions not only of the distress which they are using only to bail out the thieves, but of all the related stress (price inflation, unfunded near term federal liabilities, false asset inflation via derivatives… etc.), if you buy into the need for a bailout, you can only come up with impossible numbers to swallow. In any case, we cannot get veritable numbers from the keepers of the data, but we can estimate:

Let’s just start with federal debt (”national” debt): They tell us it’s 10 trillion. But it’s not just 10 trillion.

If it were, with a GDP of $1 trillion and no other costs whatsoever, if we could devote all our industrial revenue to pay off principal on “the” national debt, it would take us 10 years to do so — and, in my opinion, everyone neglecting this problem (perpetuating the present system) is obligated to do so, versus leaving this debt to future generations who will never be able to pay it.

But the real federal debt is far more than this.

Remember, Bill Clinton claimed to have balanced the federal budget.

No real industrial expansion — even by the time the entire dot com boom had collapsed, few ventures had made a penny of profit. All the “boom” really accomplished (and was needed for) was to replenish the circulation. (In fact, I explained this to Clinton when he was elected; and it is to my explanations which he replies falsely in his state-of-the-union address, that he had accomplished something which was to then thought “mathematically impossible.”)

No increase in tax rates or tax revenue.

And no commensurable reduction in federal expenditures.

Hmmmm. How did he “balance” the budget then?

Well, of course he didn’t!

He robbed from other dedicated funds such as social security; and I am told that there was a huge unpublished payment from Kuwait, which forgave us for tremendous pre-existing debt for saving them in the first Gulf War.

Let’s just consider the first of these irregularities, as the second cannot reliably be confirmed.

Several years ago, independent researchers estimated the robbing of other dedicated funds, primarily social security, left us with from 48 to 96 trillion in “unfunded near term federal liabilities” — an evasive term for debt. With interest, we can now estimate the upper end of that scale to be somewhere in the 110-120-trillion range. Let’s just build on that to accumulate an idea of how bad our situation *may* really be.

Add 10 trillion admitted federal debt to 120-trillion “unfunded federal liabilities,” and we have $130 trillion just to start with.

Thus if there were no interest paid to the privatization of the monetary system, with a GDP of $1 trillion that we “could” (we cannot) dedicate solely to principal, it would take us 130 years to pay off near term federal liabilities — *if* and only if we could forestall servicing private debt for so long.

Fat chance.

Some estimate the derivatives issue to conceal as much as 400 trillion in further liabilities.

Are “the markets” then not a pie in the sky?

Private debt is phenomenal as well.

So let’s just say that if we could just service the present principal of real debt we are presently oppressed by, it may take 500 years of GDP all of us now living to do so.

Of course, with interest further multiplying however much of this beyond our means, we can never do so.

But that’s why we must re-finance all debt under MPE — because in doing so, we will credit all debtors for whatever they have paid against the original principal… and this will erase these artificial multiplications of debt.

Funny.

In the last few weeks of 1978, I was researching a timeline which is supposed to be embodied in the Great Pyramid. It’s purported dates included the year of Exodus, the exact days of the birth, crucifixion, and resurrection of Christ, an unexplained 1914 date, and one or two concluding dates — the first of which may establish a beginning of the biblical “time of the end” in 1979.

By the amazing help of a librarian in California, I was able to acquire rare works of half-a-dozen of the most well known scientists to have measured the pyramid. These incredibly voluminous works pretty much correspond to their personal notes on how every measurement was taken. The usual accuracy ranged from at worst a thousandth of an inch, to as fine a granularity as a small part of a ten-thousandth.

This timeline is a theoretical system anchored at one end by two opposing inscribed lines in the descending passage. The purpose of these accurately aligned features was an obvious curiosity; and, given all the surrounding phenomena, it is natural to eventually suppose they may anchor a timeline, the dimensions/units of which would be given by the one symbol falling on the 1979 date.

The descending passage happens to align with the North Star Draconis at some specific moment in (if I recall correctly) 2121 BC. Hypothetically presuming the scribed lines thus anchor the datum point of the time line to this moment in time, engenders the prospect of the time line; and, to my surprise, all of the varied works concurred from this hypothesis indeed to give the dates given as the year of Exodus, and exact days of the birth, crucifixion and resurrection of Christ.

Quite phenomenal it was, to go over all the geometry and math and find these different works concurred.

At the resurrection of Christ however, a strange anomaly occurs in the data. All of the men whose works I was studying had come to the pyramid as confirmed agnostics. All of them left absolutely convinced that the Great Pyramid could be nothing less than the product of divine inspiration. And this may explain a very strange thing which, like your math, relates to the number 666.

The resurrection falls upon a dimension which quite oddly, is given uniformly as so many pyramid inches and “one third.”

I was attempting to determine the final event of the timeline; and, of course, encountering this hugely anomalous expression raised the prospect that there would be no credible further determination: what was the actual decimal expression? How many decimal places to account for or calculate by, thereafter? These were serious questions.

But the length of the Grand Gallery, which was to be added to this presumably “indeterminate” marker was *also* given as so many pyramid inches and a third!

So, all at once we had two dimensions which at first cast doubt that we could even calculate the final date(s).

The unexplained 1914 date however becomes a clue how to do the final calculations, if we take the number 666 to be a hermetic instruction to perform the calculations to three decimal places. (I had been carrying out my calculations on multiple parallel paths, with *a* path for the accuracy of every dimension given. [Thank goodness there were few critical dimensions.])

Of course, the idea I was exploring was that the timeline might indicate the moment of ultimate world monetary failure — a time which is said to begin a new order, not as planned by globalization of course, but as an end of a time of dogma and oppression as we now exist in.

In any case, you probably anticipate the incredible thing which the “unexplained” 1914.666 date “may” therefore indicate. The so called Federal Reserve of course was theoretically created in the eve of December 23, 1913. But it could not of course have been *put into operation* until the following year.

And I totally agree. The thing is, conversion to MPE not only provides your proposition of an alternate, superior answer to the attempted bailout… it does that in perpetuation, without cost to anyone; and furthermore resolves further multiplication of our existent debt.

By refinancing all debt under MPE, we immediately make something like 80% of our current income available to further prosperity. This itself would contribute substantially to creating and perpetually sustaining further employment and industry. But the further financing not only of that industry, but of its potential consumption — both without cost or multiplication of debt by interest — indicates the degree of prosperity which is immediately possible, with no cost or bailout whatever, under mathematically perfected economy.

So those are good points, Andrew.

RELATED MATERIAL

1. SYNOPSIS — MATHEMATICALLY PERFECTED ECONOMY™ REDUCED TO ITS BAREST THREAD
2. [ KEY ]  IF I WERE PRESIDENT — HOW TO ARREST WORLD WIDE MONETARY COLLAPSE IN A DAY
3. PROBABILITY AND TIMELINE FOR WORLD-WIDE ECONOMIC COLLAPSE AS A CONSEQUENCE OF INTEREST
4. EVALUATION OF JEFFERSON’S OPINION ON THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF A NATIONAL BANK

“To find the players in all the corruption of the world, ‘Follow the money.’ To find the captains of world corruption, follow the money all the way.”

mike montagne — founder, PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy™, author/engineer of mathematically perfected economy™ (1979)

© COPYRIGHT 2008, by mike montagne and PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy™.

Except for profit making ventures or entities otherwise granted explicit permission to publish this copyright material, this article may be distributed or reprinted in whole only, from and including any quotes preceding its title, through and inclusive of the following permalink, by email or otherwise. Visitors may also download our entire directory of regular/main site articles from our downloads page: http://perfecteconomy.com/pg-free-pfmpe-downloads.html. If you want to save your country, we encourage personal distribution of this material to all conducive recipients of your personal address books. Of course, you may also send only the following permalink:

http://perfecteconomy.com/wp/2008/11/11/email-exchange-with-andrew-graziano-regarding-solution/ [END PERMALINK]

DISCUSS THIS ARTICLE IN THE PFMPE™ FORUM:

http://www.perfecteconomy.com/f/viewtopic.php?f=87&t=148

OPEN LETTER TO THE OBAMA TRANSITION TEAM, RE: MATHEMATICALLY PERFECTED ECONOMY™

Friday, November 7, 2008, 11:23 AM

Dear Mr. Obama,

You will not save our country by any means which perpetuates a purported economy which can only multiply debt in proportion to the obligated circulation.

I am mike montagne, founder of PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy™ and author/engineer of mathematically perfected economy™ (1979). In 1979 and 1980 I provided the Reagan Administration with mathematic proofs his policies would fail either to arrest price inflation or multiplication of debt (which he did not even recognize to be a problem). In the next few years, I further provided the Reagan people with computer models which not only projected the tripling of national debt his two terms suffered, but which further projected accurately all the accumulation of debt to now, and the specter of world wide monetary failure which we are now confronted with.

The purpose of the models I provided the Reagan Administration was to calculate the maximum possible lifespan of any pretended economy subject to interest. You can still download those models, complete with source code, from my web pages; and the rectitude of their elementary, fundamental principles is probably the principal reason David Stockman resigned from the Reagan Administration. As the failure manifested of course, Mr. Stockman was asked to prejudice mathematic formulae to cover the Reagan failures.

I write however to warn you, and I will write again and again to warn you, that it is impossible to find the answer to monetary failure in the pretended experts and practitioners of a system which can only fail because it can only multiply debt in proportion to a vital circulation.

That is, the present privatization of “our” monetary system compels us to maintain a circulation so that we can continue to service monetary obligations comprised of principal and interest — which obligations therefore exceed a circulation comprised only of the principal.

As we are subject to a process of deflation greater than the potentially sustaining circulation, this arrangement is imposed upon us only by usurping the role of creditor, and subverting the laws of mathematically perfected economy™. That is, true producers are the real creditors, because, wherever further circulation is required, they must accept the promise to pay of the debtor.

In the system which has so wrongly been imposed upon us, and which can only multiply debt in proportion to a vital circulation until it imposes the present, terminal sums of debt upon us, a third party, pretending to serve us, tells us the paper/promise of the debtor is not good, unless this third party issues the promise on behalf of the debtor, and charges them interest for it. We presuppose that earned wealth is at stake, and that this justifies interest, but in fact that promise, like ours, is produced at no cost or risk whatever.

But the nature of this privatization, which thus obviously exists merely to serve this purpose of unearned and unjust taking from us, thus imposes a critical process — that of a perpetual deflation which can only multiply the unearned and unjust taking further.

That is, merely to maintain the vital circulation which we are thus obligated to maintain, ultimately we can only re-borrow interest and principal paid out of the general circulation. This condition itself, however much it exists, makes it impossible to pay down the sum of debt, because the processes of replenishing the circulation require taking on new debt, equal to the former sum of debt.

When we re-borrow interest however, which of course counted none whatsoever against former debt, we are taking on new debt. Therefore, because of the unjust obfuscation and usurpation of the relationship between creditor (producer) and debtor, in the privatized systems which have been imposed upon the world for this obvious purpose, the sum of debt perpetually increases by so much as periodic i